The brand-new 18th edition of Kurzban's Immigration Law Sourcebook is now shipping.Order Now
AILALink puts an entire immigration law library at your fingertips! Search the AILALink database for all your practice needs—statutes, regs, case law, agency guidance, publications, and more.
AILA Doc. No. 20071337 | Dated July 13, 2020
By AILA’s EOIR/ICE Joint Liaison Committee1
On June 15, 2020, AILA and its partners wrote a letter to EOIR Director McHenry in response to EOIR’s decision to resume non-detained hearings in select immigration courts during the national public health emergency. The letter explains that EOIR’s decision is premature and will not only affect the health and safety of the community, but also impact the fundamental fairness of immigration court proceedings. EOIR’s Policy Memo 20-13: EOIR Practices Related to the COVID-19 Outbreak fails to adequately account for the significant risks of COVID-19 transmission both inside and outside of the courtroom. Below is a practice pointer from AILA’s EOIR/ICE Joint Liaison Committee on immigration court operations.
|EOIR’s Date of Proposed Reopening||Location|
|June 15, 2020||Honolulu|
|June 29, 2020||Boston, Dallas, Las Vegas, Buffalo, Hartford, and New Orleans|
|July 6, 2020||Cleveland and Philadelphia|
|July 13, 2020||Newark, Baltimore, and Detroit|
|July 20, 2020||Arlington|
*Note, some of these courts may have closed after resuming non-detained hearings, please check the Individual Immigration Court Operational Status for more information.
1 Special thanks to EOIR/ICE Joint Liaison Committee Chair Sui Chung for her contribution to this practice pointer.
Cite as AILA Doc. No. 20071337.
American Immigration Lawyers Association
1331 G Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
Copyright © 1993-
American Immigration Lawyers Association.
AILA.org should not be relied upon as the exclusive source for your legal research. Nothing on AILA.org constitutes legal advice, and information on AILA.org is not a substitute for independent legal advice based on a thorough review and analysis of the facts of each individual case, and independent research based on statutory and regulatory authorities, case law, policy guidance, and for procedural issues, federal government websites.