Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0
On the first day of his second term, President Trump suspended all entries at the U.S. Southern Border for asylum seekers. Since then, the Administration has implemented sweeping restrictions that shut America’s doors to people fleeing persecution. These policies violate federal law, erode constitutionally protected due process, exacerbate the asylum backlog, and give those seeking safety an increasingly narrow path to protection.
Left unchecked by Congress, these policies will have dire consequences for both asylum seekers and the integrity of our legal system. Asylum seekers—especially those without access to counsel—are at grave risk of being returned to harm.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The Administration can maintain order at U.S. borders and effectively manage migration without sacrificing fairness and adherence to the law. With more trained asylum officers, a streamlined legal process, legal representation for asylum seekers, and more effective coordination between relevant agencies, the U.S. can establish a safe, orderly, and humane asylum system.
Browse the Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0 collection
Joint Analysis of Biden Border Proclamation
AILA, as well as several other organizations, provide joint analysis of the Biden Border Proclamation, including key takeaways, background information, and summaries of the changes.
Stuck Between Congressional Inaction and Border Realities, President Biden Issues New Proclamation and Rule on Asylum
AILA ED Ben Johnson responded to the Biden Administration’s new proclamation and rule aimed at preventing migrants entering the U.S. between ports of entry from accessing asylum, noting that “the powers of the Executive Branch alone are insufficient to address the challenges at the border.”
ICE Issues Implementation Guidance for Noncitizens Described in the June 3, 2024, Presidential Proclamation
ICE issued implementation guidance for noncitizens described in the June 3, 2024, Presidential Proclamation, Securing the Border, and the Interim Final Rule, Securing the Border, which went into effect on 12:01 am (ET) on June 5, 2024.
Policy Brief: Presidential Authority to Block or Expel Migrants
President Biden is considering restricting the number of migrants who can enter the United States and barring asylum seekers for extended periods. AILA would oppose this policy if it prevents asylum seekers from receiving fair and accurate consideration of their requests for asylum.
CA8 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Bosnian Muslims Based on Lack of Nexus to Protected Ground
The court upheld BIA finding that petitioners failed to show a nexus between their protected ground and the persecution they suffered, where the BIA found they had been targeted by Serbian criminals not for being Bosniak, but for police informant activities. (Durakovic v. Garland, 5/20/24)
USCIS Shifts Workload for Form I-730 Following-to-Join Refugee Petitions
USCIS announced that effective May 6, 2024, all Forms I-730, Refugee/Asylee Relative Petition, filed for following to join refugees (FTJ-R) are being processed at the USCIS International Operations Division rather than the Asylum Vetting Center.
IRAP Resource: What We Know About the Biden Administration's Safe Mobility Initiative
The International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) provides an updated resource for practitioners and advocates with background on the Biden Administration’s Safe Mobility Initiative.
Resources Related to the 2024 Senate Border Negotiations
On May 23, the Senate voted down (43-50) the Border Act, a bill introduced by Senator Murphy (D-CT). The Border Act includes similar immigration provisions as the February bipartisan bill he jointly wrote with Senators Lankford (R-OK) and Sinema (I-AZ).
CA1 Finds BIA Improperly Disregarded Evidence of Changed Country Conditions in Indonesia in Petitioners’ Motion to Reopen
The court held that, in reviewing the motion to reopen of the petitioners based on changed country conditions related to acts of violence directed at Christian Indonesians, the BIA discarded evidence—without considering its merits—on legally unjustifiable bases. (Tulung v. Garland, 5/21/24)
AILA Joins Letter Urging USCIS to Provide a Minimum of 60-Day Comment Period on NPRM on Mandatory Bars in Fear Screening
AILA joins other advocacy organizations in requesting a minimum of 60 days for public comment after DHS proposed a new rule governing fear screenings by asylum officers and establishing an atypical, abbreviated thirty-day comment period.
Policy Brief: Solutions for the Border and America's Immigration System
AILA presents solutions to Congress and the President to address the border and modernize America’s immigration system. With the dramatic shifts in worldwide migration sustained action is needed at the U.S. southern border to ensure the fair, fast, and orderly processing of arriving migrants.
CA1 Upholds Denial of Motion to Reopen of Christian Chinese-Indonesian Petitioners Based on Changed Country Conditions in Indonesia
The court denied the petition for review of the BIA’s second denial of reopening, finding that the BIA reasonably found that petitioners had failed to satisfy the requirements for an exception to late filing in INA §240(c)(7)(C)(ii) and 8 CFR §1003.2(c)(3)(ii). (Djokro v. Garland, 5/17/24)
DHS and DOJ to Announce “Recent Arrivals” Docket Process for More Efficient Immigration Hearings
DOJ finalizes rule on a new Recent Arrives Docket process aiming to render final decisions within 180 days for certain noncitizen single adults who attempt to cross between ports of entry at the Southwest border. The docket will operate in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, LA, and New York City.
Southern California Chapter: Q&A from Liaison Meeting with Los Angeles Asylum Office (5/16/24)
Notes from Southern California Chapter’s stakeholder meeting with Los Angeles asylum office on 5/16/24.
Congressional Letter to USCIS on EADs for Asylees and Humanitarian Parolees
Congressional offices sent a letter to USCIS expressing ongoing concerns with the process for submitting Employment Authorization Document (EAD) applications for asylee and humanitarian parolees. The letter outlines the barriers and several questions regarding Administration plans.
USCIS Opens Additional San Francisco Asylum Office Location
USCIS’s San Francisco Asylum Office is opening an additional temporary location in Oakland, California. Effective May 15, asylum applicants under the jurisdiction of the San Francisco Asylum Office may receive an interview notice to appear at the asylum office located in Oakland.
DHS NPRM on the Application of Certain Mandatory Bars in Fear Screenings
DHS notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to allow asylum officers to consider the potential applicability of certain bars to asylum and statutory withholding of removal during certain fear screenings. Comments due by June 12, 2024. (89 FR 41347, 5/13/24)
AILA Senior Director of Government Relations Shares Insights on Asylum Rule Notice
Greg Chen responds to the advance copy of the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would give authority to asylum officers to apply existing security and terrorism related bars during the initial screening process for credible fear.
USCIS Memo with Updates to Credible Fear Checklist Related to Internal Relocation
USCIS issued a memo to explain the latest revisions to the credible fear (CF) checklist related to evaluating internal relocation as part of the CF determination. Released via FOIA to the African Immigrant Rights Council.
USCIS Updates to Credible Fear Checklist Related to Internal Relocation
Asylum Division Chief John Lafferty revised the checklist for evaluating internal relocation as part of the CF determination to align with the CLP rule's rebuttable presumption of ineligibility for asylum for certain noncitizens who enter at the U.S.-Mexico land border or adjacent coastal borders.
AILA Member Receives FOIA Response and Obtains an Asylum Officer Lesson Plan
An AILA member has received a FOIA response and obtained an asylum officer lesson plan titled "Credible Fear of Persecution and Torture Determinations." The lesson is dated May 9, 2024 and covers who is subject to expedited removal and how to apply the credible fear standard.
Practice Alert: FedEx Facility in South Michigan Destroyed by Tornado
On May 7, a potential tornado destroyed a FedEx facility in Portage, in the southern part of Michigan. AILA encourages members whose filings may be affected by this issue, to send a report to reports@aila.org. Reports should include information on the affected filing.
EOIR 30-Day Comment Request of EOIR-26A
EOIR 30-day comment request on the Fee Waiver Request (EOIR-26A). Comments are due by 6/7/24. (89 FR 38917, 5/8/24)
AILA Writes to USCIS Requesting Data and Statistics
AILA's Asylum and Refugee National Committee wrote a letter to USCIS with suggested data and statistics for publication on its website.
CA8 Upholds Reinstatement of Removal Order Where Petitioner Feared Returning to Mexico Due to Cartel Violence
Where petitioner feared returning to Mexico due to cartel violence, the court held that substantial evidence supported the IJ’s finding that he failed to show a reasonable fear of persecution or torture for purposes of removal proceedings under INA §241. (Galvez-Vicencio v. Garland, 5/6/24)