Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0
On the first day of his second term, President Trump suspended all entries at the U.S. Southern Border for asylum seekers. Since then, the Administration has implemented sweeping restrictions that shut America’s doors to people fleeing persecution. These policies violate federal law, erode constitutionally protected due process, exacerbate the asylum backlog, and give those seeking safety an increasingly narrow path to protection.
Left unchecked by Congress, these policies will have dire consequences for both asylum seekers and the integrity of our legal system. Asylum seekers—especially those without access to counsel—are at grave risk of being returned to harm.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The Administration can maintain order at U.S. borders and effectively manage migration without sacrificing fairness and adherence to the law. With more trained asylum officers, a streamlined legal process, legal representation for asylum seekers, and more effective coordination between relevant agencies, the U.S. can establish a safe, orderly, and humane asylum system.
Browse the Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0 collection
EOIR Releases Asylum Decision Rates by Nationality for FY2020
EOIR released asylum rates broken down by nationality for FY2020, including information on asylum grants, denials, administrative closure, and more.
EOIR Releases Asylum Decision Rates by Nationality in Cases Originating with a Credible Fear Claim for FY2020
EOIR released asylum decision rates (grants, denials, administrative closure, and other) in cases that originated with a credible fear claim, broken down by the nationality of applicants for FY2020 (through 6/30/20).
USCIS Hypocrisy Reaches New Levels
Asylum experts Dree Collopy and Lindsay Harris highlight the ways in which asylum adjudication inefficiencies have contributed to USCIS' $1.2 billion budget shortfall and urge that Congress hold USCIS accountable, linking to AILA's Take Action on the issue that members of the public can easily use.
EOIR Released Rates of Asylum Filings in Cases Originating with a Credible Fear Claim
EOIR released statistics on the rate of asylum filings in cases originating with a credible fear claim, from FY2008 through the third quarter of FY2020. Through June 30, 2020, the rate was 62 percent.
EOIR Released Statistics on Credible Fear Review and Reasonable Fear Review Decisions
EOIR released statistics on credible fear review and reasonable fear review decisions from FY2000 through the third quarter of FY2020.
EOIR Released Statistics on Defensive Asylum Applications
EOIR released statistics on defensive asylum applications from FY2008 through the third quarter of FY2020. In FY2020 (through June 30, 2020), EOIR received 123,615 defensive asylum applications and granted 9,868 applications, for a defensive receipts to grants ratio of 12.52:1.
EOIR Releases Statistics on Affirmative Asylum Applications
EOIR released statistics on the total number of affirmative asylum applications filed and granted from FY2008 through the third quarter of FY2020. In FY2020 (through June 30, 2020), the affirmative receipts to affirmative grants ratio was 9.02:1.
EOIR Releases Statistics on All Pending I-862 Proceedings and Pending I-862 Proceedings Originating with a Credible Fear Claim
EOIR released statistics on all pending I-862 proceedings and pending I-862 proceedings originating with a credible fear claim. As of June 30, 2020, EOIR had a total of 1,199,965 pending I-862 proceedings, out of which 223,118 originated with a credible fear claim.
EOIR Released Asylum Decision and Filing Rates in Cases Originating with a Credible Fear Claim
EOIR released data on asylum decision rates (grants, denials, administrative closure, and other) and asylum filing rates for cases that originated with a credible fear claim for FY2008 through the third quarter of FY2020 (through June 30, 2020).
Impact on Rosario Class Members: New Rule Eliminating 30-Day Processing Deadline for Adjudication of Employment Applications Filed by Initia
The American Immigration Council and partners provide a practice alert on Rosario v. USCIS addressing a final rule that eliminates the 30-day processing deadline for the adjudication of EAD applications for first-time asylum applicants.
CA9 Finds Asylum Applicant’s Testimony Alone Was Not Sufficient to Satisfy Social Distinction Requirement for PSGs
The court held that petitioner had failed to establish that his proposed particular social groups (PSGs) comprised of “Mexican professionals who refuse to cooperate with drug cartels” and “agronomists who refuse to help cultivate drugs” were socially distinct. (Diaz-Torres v. Barr, 6/29/20)
CA4 Upholds Asylum Denial to Salvadoran Who Feared Persecution by His Brother’s Murderers
The court held that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s conclusion that the attackers who threatened the petitioner were motivated by a desire to prevent him from reporting his brother’s murder to the police, and not by the petitioner’s family ties. (Cedillos-Cedillos v. Barr, 6/26/20)
CA8 Finds BIA Did Not Err in Denying CAT Relief to HIV-Positive Member of the Begedi Clan in Somalia
The court upheld the BIA’s denial of petitioner’s application for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), finding that the IJ had clearly erred in forecasting that petitioner would more likely than not be tortured if returned to Somalia. (Abdi Omar v. Barr, 6/26/20)
CA9 Finds Mexican Petitioner Targeted by Los Zetas Drug Cartel Is Entitled to CAT Relief
The court held that the evidence compelled the conclusion that it was more likely than not Los Zetas would target petitioner for murder or other torture if she were removed to Mexico, and remanded for the BIA to grant Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief. (Xochihua-Jaimes v. Barr, 6/26/20)
USCIS Final Rule on Employment Authorization for Asylum Applicants
USCIS final rule making multiple changes to the regulations governing asylum applications and eligibility for employment authorization based on a pending asylum application. The rule is effective 8/25/20. (85 FR 38532, 6/26/20)
Supreme Court Says INA §242(e)(2) Does Not Violate Suspension or Due Process Clauses
The U.S. Supreme Court held that, as applied in the case, INA §242(e)(2)—which limits the habeas review obtainable by a noncitizen detained for expedited removal—does not violate the Suspension or Due Process Clauses of the Constitution. (DHS v. Thuraissigiam, 6/25/20)
CA7 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Argentinian Petitioner Who Alleged Persecution Based on His Family Membership
The court held that the record supported the BIA’s conclusion that petitioner had not presented a case warranting relief because of a credible fear of persecution or torture, and that the BIA had correctly determined that a waiver signed upon his entry was valid. (Ferreyra v. Barr, 6/16/20)
EOIR to Resume Hearings in Non-Detained Cases at Some Immigration Courts
EOIR announced it will resume non-detained hearings and master calendar dockets involving small numbers of respondents at immigration courts in Boston, Buffalo, Dallas, Hartford, Las Vegas, and New Orleans on 6/29/20. The option to file by email at these and some other courts will end on 8/26/20.
CA2 Remands Asylum Claim to Consider Petitioners’ Evidence of Changed Country Conditions in Indonesia
The court held that the BIA’s denial of the petitioners’ motion to reopen failed to account for relevant evidence of changed country conditions for Christians in Indonesia, and that 8 CFR §1003.2(c)(1) did not require them to submit a new asylum application. (Tanusantoso v. Barr, 6/23/20)
Senators Send Letter to EOIR Director About EOIR’s Decision to Resume Hearings Amid COVID-19 Pandemic
Senator Warren (D-MA) led a group of senators in sending a letter to EOIR Director McHenry about EOIR’s decision to resume non-detained hearings, its process for making that decision, and its communication of that decision to stakeholders. The letter echoes AILA’s concerns about EOIR’s decision.
USCIS Final Rule Removing 30-Day Processing Provision for EADs for Asylum Applicants
USCIS final rule eliminating the regulation articulating a 30-day processing timeframe for USCIS to adjudicate initial Applications for Employment Authorization for asylum applicants. The rule is effective 8/21/20. (85 FR 37502, 6/22/20)
EOIR Announces Relocation of the San Diego Immigration Court
EOIR announced that the effective date of the relocation of the San Diego Immigration Court is June 29, 2020. The new location will resume non-detained hearings on July 6, 2020. Notice includes the new location’s address, hours of operation, and telephone number.
AILA and Partners Send Letter Requesting Asylum Rule Comment Period Extension
AILA and 501 partner organizations sent a letter to various immigration agencies requesting a minimum of 60 days for public comment on a joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would dismantle asylum eligibility for traumatized and vulnerable individuals.
Fight Back Against Chevron Deference in Asylum and Withholding Cases
In this blog post, AILA member Maureen Sweeney previews her AILA Law Journal article and describes several factors litigators can argue weigh against applying Chevron in asylum and withholding cases “and in favor of robust judicial review of BIA and AG decisions.“
Practice Alert: DHS and DOJ Issue Joint Statement Rescheduling Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) Cases
On June 16, 2020, DOJ EOIR and DHS issued a joint statement on the rescheduling of MPP hearings. This practice alert provides an overview of the changes made by this statement to prior DHS procedures for MPP cases without individual notice to affected migrants or their attorneys.