Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0
On the first day of his second term, President Trump suspended all entries at the U.S. Southern Border for asylum seekers. Since then, the Administration has implemented sweeping restrictions that shut America’s doors to people fleeing persecution. These policies violate federal law, erode constitutionally protected due process, exacerbate the asylum backlog, and give those seeking safety an increasingly narrow path to protection.
Left unchecked by Congress, these policies will have dire consequences for both asylum seekers and the integrity of our legal system. Asylum seekers—especially those without access to counsel—are at grave risk of being returned to harm.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The Administration can maintain order at U.S. borders and effectively manage migration without sacrificing fairness and adherence to the law. With more trained asylum officers, a streamlined legal process, legal representation for asylum seekers, and more effective coordination between relevant agencies, the U.S. can establish a safe, orderly, and humane asylum system.
Browse the Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0 collection
CRS Releases Legal Sidebar on U.S. Immigration Laws Regulating the Admission and Exclusion of Noncitizens at the Border
CRS updated its legal sidebar on laws governing the admission and exclusion of noncitizens at the border, including procedures for asylum seekers and circumstances in which arriving noncitizens may be detained; special rules for treatment of UACs; recent policy changes; and legislative proposals.
CA5 Finds Substantial Evidence Supported IJ’s Adverse Credibility Determination as to LGBT Asylum Seeker from El Salvador
The court upheld the BIA’s finding that the IJ’s adverse credibility determination was not clearly erroneous under the totality of the circumstances, and found that the Salvadoran petitioner could not prevail on his due process claim. (Santos-Alvarado v. Barr, 7/21/20)
Advocacy Organizations File Lawsuit Challenging New DHS Asylum EAD Rules
Several immigration advocacy organizations filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland challenging two new DHS final rules pertaining to employment authorization documents (EADs) for asylum seekers. (Casa de Maryland, Inc., et al. v. Wolf, et al., 7/21/20)
CA6 Finds BIA Failed to Consider Evidence of Russian Petitioner’s Threatened Prosecution in Assessing His Asylum Claim
Granting the petition for review, the court held that the BIA erred in disregarding evidence that the petitioner, who had engaged in anticorruption whistleblowing activities, would be criminally prosecuted for his political opinion if he was returned to Russia. (Skripkov v. Barr, 7/20/20)
EOIR Announces 46 New Immigration Judges
EOIR announced the investiture of 46 new immigration judges, including three assistant chief immigration judges. Per EOIR, this brings the immigration judge corps to 509, which is the highest total ever. Notice includes the judges’ biographical information and courts of appointment.
D.C. Circuit Upholds Injunction Against Enforcement of Two of Government’s New Credible Fear Policies
The court affirmed in part the district court’s injunction against enforcement of the government’s new credible fear policies, finding that the “condoned-or-completely-helpless” standard and USCIS’s choice-of-law policy were arbitrary and capricious. (Grace, et al. v. Barr, et al., 7/17/20)
EOIR to Resume Hearings in Non-Detained Cases at the Arlington Immigration Court
EOIR announced that it will resume non-detained individual (merits) hearings and master calendar dockets involving relatively small numbers of respondents at the Arlington Immigration Court on July 20, 2020. The option to file by email at the court will end on September 20, 2020.
AILA, the Council, and the Justice Campaign Submit Comments Opposing Proposed Asylum Rule
AILA, the Council, and the Justice Campaign submitted joint comments opposing an EOIR/USCIS proposed rule on Procedures for Asylum and Withholding of Removal; Credible Fear and Reasonable Fear Review. The rule will return vulnerable individuals who deserve protection to danger and potential death.
BIA Rules On DHS’s Authority to Return Individuals to a Contiguous Foreign Territory Under MPP
BIA ruled that under INA §235(b)2(c), an individual who is arriving on land from a contiguous foreign territory may be returned by DHS to that country pursuant to MPP, regardless of whether the individual arrives at or between a designated POE. Matter of M-D-C-V-, 28 I&N Dec. 18 (BIA 2020)
Attorney General Vacates BIA’s Decision in Matter of O-F-A-S-
Clarifying the proper approach for determining “official capacity” for the purpose of deciding CAT protection, the AG vacated the BIA’s decision in Matter of O-F-A-S-, 27 I&N Dec. 709 (BIA 2019), and remanded the case for review. Matter of O-F-A-S-, 28 I&N Dec. 35 (A.G. 2020)
The Roundtable of Former Immigration Judges Submits Comment on Proposed Plans to End Asylum
The Roundtable of Former Immigration Judges sent a letter to EOIR and USCIS opposing the proposed rule that would make multiple changes to regulations governing asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT protection. The Roundtable urge the departments to withdraw all sections of the proposed rule.
Practice Pointer: EOIR’s Decision to Resume Select Non-Detained Immigration Court Dockets
AILA’s EOIR/ICE Joint Liaison Committee provides a practice pointer on EOIR’s decision to resume select non-detained immigration court cases. Special thanks to chair of the committee, Sui Chung.
CA2 Holds That Changed Circumstances Under INA §208(a)(2)(D) Need Not Arise Prior to the Filing of an Asylum Application
Granting the petition for review, the court held that pursuant to INA §208(a)(2)(D), changed circumstances presenting an exception to the one-year deadline for filing an asylum application need not arise prior to the filing of the application. (Ordonez Azmen v. Barr, 7/13/20)
CA7 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Petitioner Who Feared Life as an Openly Gay Woman in Mexico
The court upheld the BIA’s denial of asylum to the Mexican petitioner, who sought relief based on threats of physical violence she had received because of her gay sexual orientation, concluding that substantial evidence supported the agency’s decision. (Escobedo Marquez v. Barr, 7/13/20)
Fighting for Freedom from Detention During COVID-19
National Advocacy Counsel Katie Shepherd of the Immigration Justice Campaign shares the recent work with pro bono counsel Gibson Dunn that aims to free immigrants from the appalling conditions at Joe Corley detention facility.
CA9 Says Conviction for Petty Theft in California Is a CIMT (Withdrawn)
The court held that petitioner’s conviction for petty theft in California was a CIMT, and that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to reopen to seek asylum based on changed country conditions in the Philippines. (Silva v. Barr, 7/10/20, withdrawn 3/30/21)
USCIS and EOIR Proposed Rule on Pandemic-Related Security Bars to Asylum and Withholding of Removal
USCIS/EOIR proposed rule to let DHS/DOJ consider “emergency public health concerns based on communicable disease due to potential international threats from the spread of pandemics" when determining ineligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. Comments due 8/10/20. (85 FR 41201, 7/9/20)
The Administration is Weaponizing COVID-19 to End Immigration
AILA Past President Ira Kurzban details how the Trump Administration has weaponized the COVID-19 pandemic to implement long-sought immigration policies, banning immigrants and non-immigrants alike.
Administration Plans Unnecessary and Unconscionable Ban on Asylum Seekers Masked Behind False Public Health Premise
AILA and the Council expressed deep concern about the administration’s soon-to-be-published proposed rule that would allow DHS to ban people from seeking asylum or withholding of removal in the United States solely because they traveled from or through a country under threat by a serious disease.
EOIR to Resume Hearings in Non-Detained Cases at the Baltimore, Detroit, and Newark Immigration Courts
EOIR announced that it will resume non-detained individual (merits) hearings and master calendar dockets involving relatively small numbers of respondents at the Baltimore, Detroit, and Newark immigration courts on 7/13/20. The option to file by email at these courts will end on 9/13/20.
CA8 Finds It Lacks Jurisdiction to Consider Petitioner’s Arguments Concerning Changed Country Conditions in Somalia
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the vast majority of the petitioner’s arguments concerning his motion to reopen his asylum and withholding of removal claims based on changed country conditions in Somalia. (Sharif v. Barr, 7/7/20)
CRS Releases Legal Sidebar on Supreme Court’s Decision to Uphold Limited Review of Expedited Removal
CRS released a legal sidebar on the Supreme Court’s decision in DHS v. Thuraissigiam which upheld restrictions on the ability of an individual in expedited removal to challenge matters other than the detention’s lawfulness. The sidebar explores the decision, its implications, and more.
DOJ’s Immigration Court Practice Manual (Updated on 7/2/20)
On July 2, 2020, the OCIJ updated its Immigration Court Practice Manual, a comprehensive guide on uniform procedures, recommendations, and requirements for practice before immigration courts.
EOIR to Resume Hearings in Non-Detained Cases at the Chicago, Cleveland, Philadelphia, and Saipan Immigration Courts
EOIR will resume non-detained individual (merits) hearings and master calendar dockets including relatively small number of respondents at the Chicago, Cleveland, Philadelphia, and Saipan immigration courts on 7/6/20. The option to file by email at these courts and at York will end on 9/6/20.
EOIR Released Rates of Asylum Filings in Cases Originating with a Credible Fear Claim
EOIR released statistics on the rate of asylum filings in cases originating with a credible fear claim, from FY2008 through the third quarter of FY2020. Through June 30, 2020, the rate was 62 percent.