Featured Issue: Citizenship and Protections for Dreamers and Others Without Permanent Status
Many immigrants who lack permanent legal status have lived in the United States for years, investing in their communities and families, building businesses, and contributing billions to the economy. Polls show Americans support granting permanent legal status for unauthorized immigrants and people with temporary status. Four out of five (80%) of Americans support granting permanent legal status to Dreamers. AILA urges Congress to provide a path to citizenship for people who are undocumented or whose legal status is temporary.
On December 4, 2025, Senators Durbin (D-IL) and Murkowski (R-AK) reintroduced the Dream Act of 2025. In response, Executive Director Ben Johson said:
“At a time when immigration is often cast as a divisive issue, the American people are remarkably united: four out of five Americans believe Dreamers are part of the fabric of this nation and deserve a real path to citizenship. Congress and the President must seize this moment. Passing the Dream Act is not only the right thing to do; it is a critical first step toward providing long-overdue stability and dignity to people who have strengthened our communities and contributed to our country for years, yet still have no meaningful way to secure permanent legal status.”
AILA supports the following bills and urges Congress to introduce and enact them into law.
- The Dream Act of 2025 S.3348 - Durbin (D-IL) and Murkowski (R-AK)
- Read Senator Durbin’s press release on the bill’s reintroduction
- The American Dream and Promise Act of 2025 H.R.1589 - Garcia (D-TX)
Protecting DACA and TPS Recipients
On June 15, 2012, DHS announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which provided temporary protection from deportation (deferred action) for certain undocumented youth. Since its creation, DACA has protected over 830,000 people who are valued members of our communities and contribute to the strength of the nation. From day one, the DACA program was challenged in court and still hangs in the balance. The President should defend and expand DACA and other legal pathways to protect Dreamers and other populations who still do not have permanent status.
AILA urges President Trump to use executive branch authorities to protect and expand legal pathways for undocumented immigrants, DACA and TPS recipients, and others with a temporary status.
Browse the Featured Issue: Citizenship and Protections for Dreamers and Others Without Permanent Status collection
AILA Notes from SCOPS Teleconference (9/28/16)
AILA notes from a teleconference with SCOPS on 9/28/16. Topics include premium processing cases, EAD renewals, DACA approval notices, the refugee admissions program and P-2 direct access for I-130 beneficiaries, and I-130 step-child petition RFEs.
USCIS Message: How to Inquire About Your DACA Renewal Request
USCIS message stating that it makes every effort to adjudicate DACA renewal requests within 120 days, and outlining several ways to inquire about DACA renewal requests pending for more than 105 days.
USCIS Performance Data on DACA Applications Through Third Quarter of FY2016
USCIS statistics on I-821D DACA applications, broken down by intake (accepted and rejected), biometrics, case status (received, approved, denied, or pending), and whether the application was an initial or renewal application for FY2012 through FY2016. FY2016 data is broken down by quarter.
USCIS Update on DACA Renewal Requests
USCIS posted an update on its website stating that its current goal is to process DACA renewal requests within 120 days, and that DACA applicants whose renewal requests have been pending for more than 105 days may contact USCIS.
CSC PowerPoint Presentations from 8/31/16 Open House
The California Service Center (CSC) provided the PowerPoint presentations from its 8/31/16 open house, where updates were given on employment and family-based immigration, student issues, and DACA.
What is Donald Trump’s Position on Immigration?
Why do we ask? And why particularly of Donald Trump and not Hillary Clinton? While the devil is always in the details, it is clear that Secretary Clinton has a more favorable view of immigration and has laid out a fairly clear strategy for how she would reform the current system. But the question
DACA Recipient Challenges Nationwide Scope of DAPA/DACA+ Injunction
A DACA recipient filed a complaint challenging DHS’s revocation of his employment authorization and seeking to exempt New York residents from Texas Judge Andrew Hanen’s injunction against President Obama’s executive actions on immigration. (Batalla Vidal v. Baran, et al., 8/25/16)
DACAversary
On June 15, 2012, President Obama changed many lives for the better with his historic announcement of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) initiative. This critical and necessary action by the President went into effect on August 15, 2012 when young people were able to take the piles of
AILA FAQs on Supreme Court’s Ruling in U.S. v. Texas
AILA’s FAQs (updated on 8/3/16) on the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Texas provide an explanation of the Court’s ruling, the impact it will have on millions of immigrant families waiting to apply for DAPA and DACA+, and predictions of what will happen next in the legal case.
USCIS Message: Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Is Still Available
USCIS reminder that the Supreme Court's 6/23/16 decision in United States v. Texas does not affect the existing 2012 policy regarding DACA. Individuals who meet the 2012 DACA guidelines may continue to file an initial or renewal request for DACA under those guidelines.
CRS Report: What Does the Supreme Court’s 4-4 Split in Texas Mean for Future Executive Action as to Immigration
A CRS Legal Sidebar report discusses how the Supreme Court’s 4-4 split in United States v. Texas might affect the ability of the president to issue executive actions on immigration in the future.
CRS Report: FAQs Regarding the Supreme Court’s 4-4 Split on Immigration
A CRS Legal Sidebar provides answers to frequently asked questions regarding the effects of the Supreme Court’s 4-4 decision in United States v. Texas.
Supreme Court Affirms Fifth Circuit’s Decision in United States v. Texas
An equally divided U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit's decision, effectively upholding the lower court’s injunction halting the expansion of the DACA program and the creation of the new DAPA program. (United States v. Texas, 6/23/16)
AILA: Divided Supreme Court Leaves Millions of Immigrant Families in Limbo
AILA responded to the Supreme Court’s 4-4 deadlock in United States v. Texas with AILA Executive Director Benjamin Johnson noting, “Though today’s decision is disappointing, we must remember that this is not the end of the road for these incredibly important programs.”
AILA Member Talking Points on SCOTUS United States v. Texas Deadlock
AILA members can use these Talking Points with media when asked about the U.S. Supreme Court deadlock in United States v. Texas.
Law Student Perspective: Supreme Court to Review Obama’s Executive Actions on Immigration
Lauren Berkowitz and AILA member Jonathan Grode discuss the impending U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Texas, a politically charged case that raises important questions about the scope of the President’s authority to enforce U.S. immigration laws.
DOJ OIL June 2016 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for June 2016, with articles on United States v. Texas and Mathis v. United States, as well as summaries of circuit court decisions for June 2016.
My American Dreams PBS Film Project
For four years, all across the United States, they have come to law offices like ours. They have come with tidy stacks of records from their years in the United States - vaccination cards, dog-eared school grade cards, pay stubs from high school jobs, college awards. The older ones come by themselve
Outrage
“Apurar, cielos, pretendo, Por qué me tratáis así, qué delito cometí contra vosotros naciendo. Aunque si nací, ya entiendo qué delito he cometido; bastante causa ha tenido vuestra justicia y rigor, Pues el delito mayor del hombre es haber nacido.“ ~ by Pedro Calderón de la Barca Outrage is the
DOD Fact Sheet on MAVNI Recruitment Pilot Program
DOD fact sheet on the Military Accessions Vital to National Interest (MAVNI) recruitment pilot program. To determine its value in enhancing military readiness, the limited pilot program will recruit up to 5,200 people in FY2016, and will continue through September 30, 2016.
AIM: The Benefits of DACA
In AILA's April Interview of the Month, DACA recipient and paralegal Alex Alvarado shares his story of how deferred action has impacted his life and why events like AILA's National Day of Action are important to continuing to push for immigration reform.
Webcast with the Experts: United States v. Texas
Watch AILA’s Director of Advocacy Greg Chen, American Immigration Council’s Legal Director Melissa Crow, and UCLA School of Law Professor Hiroshi Motomura as they recap and offer expert analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in the United States v. Texas case.
What Happened Yesterday
It was early Monday morning in Los Angeles and all along the West Coast of the United States, people were just waking up. Cars were jamming the freeways, lines were forming at coffee shops and TVs were tuned to the morning news. Meanwhile, in Washington D.C., the five men and three women who current
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Executive Branch’s Immigration Powers
AILA President Victor Nieblas Pradis commented on the oral arguments heard today in United States v. Texas noting, “AILA is confident that on the law and facts at issue in this case, it is increasingly clear that there is ample authority and precedent for the president to take these steps.”
Educational Materials on United States v. Texas
The Committee for Immigration Reform Implementation (CIRI) partners have developed flyers that stakeholders can use to share information about United States v. Texas with the public. Please feel free to download, customize, and use these flyers.