Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
CA5 Finds False Testimony Regarding Address Does Not Bar Good Moral Character
The court held that false testimony to an asylum officer regarding Petitioner's address was not made with the subjective intent of obtaining immigration benefits and thus does not preclude good moral character for purposes of cancellation of removal. (Gonzalez-Maldonado v. Gonzales, 5/25/07)
CA7 Finds Flaws in BIA’s Denial of Cameroonian FGM Asylum Claim
The court held that the BIA disregarded key evidence specific to Petitioners’ claim, relying instead on general background evidence, and then faulted Petitioners for failing to offer specific evidence. (Agbor v. Gonzales, 5/25/07)
CA9 Upholds Constitutionality of GMC Regulation in Naturalization Proceedings
CA9 held 8 CFR §316.10(b)(3)(iii), which permits an adverse moral character finding for naturalization purposes based on acts that occurred within the relevant statutory period even if the conviction was entered outside the statutory period, is not ultra vires. (U.S. v. Dang, 5/24/07)
CA11 Rejects Colombian Asylum Claim for Failure to Show Nexus
CA11 found there was no dispute that the FARC had persecuted Petitioners, in part, because they were wealthy and refused to pay a war tax, but that this did not mean that Petitioners’ fear of persecution was on account of political opinion. (Cardona Rivera v. U.S. Att’y Gen, 5/23/07)
CA1 Finds Persecutor Bar Requires Culpable Knowledge
The court held that the persecutor bar should not apply to Petitioner, a former lieutenant in the Peruvian military, if his version of his state of mind is accepted, that is, if he had no knowledge of the murder of civilians. (Castaneda-Castillo v. Gonzales, 5/23/07)
CA8 Holds IJ Improperly Excluded Expert Report and Testimony in Asylum Case
The court held that the IJ’s exclusion of experts’ reports and testimony likely affected the outcome of the asylum proceedings and resulted in the violation of Petitioner’s due process rights. (Tun v. Gonzales, 5/21/07)
CA9 Holds Time Served Under Recidivist Statute May Count Toward Prison Term for §212(c) Purposes
The court held that an IJ may include time served under a recidivist statute or other sentencing enhancement when considering eligibility for §212(c) relief. (Saravia-Paguada v. Gonzales, 5/21/07)
Section-by-Section Summary of the Senate “Grand Bargain” Bill
Section-by-section summary of the Senate “grand bargain” CIR legislation (substitute amendment for S. 1348), prepared by AILA with the assistance of Marc Rosenblum and Kerri Sherlock.
CA6 Reverses IJ’s Adverse Credibility Finding; Recommends New IJ on Remand
The court found that the IJ focused on irrelevant and arguably nonexistent inconsistencies in making his adverse credibility finding. (Mapouya v. Gonzales, 5/18/07)
CA7 Holds Palestinian Is Citizen of Jordan Based on Admission at Hearing
The court upheld the IJ’s removal order to Jordan for a West Bank Palestinian, stating that it suspected that he was stateless, not a Jordanian citizen, based on West Bank history. (Zahren v. Gonzales, 5/17/07)
CA9 Finds BIA Error in AWO Where Petitioner Alleged “Procedural Irregularity” in IJ Proceedings
The court held that the BIA erred when it summarily affirmed the IJ’s decision, and thereby failed to consider and decide Petitioner’s claim that his statutory and constitutional right to counsel was violated. (Montes-Lopez v. Gonzales, 5/17/07)
CA9 Says Waiver of Inadmissibility Does Not Waive Continuous Residence for Legalization
CA9 upheld the denial of Petitioner’s legalization application. A waiver of inadmissibility would waive INA §212(a)(9)(A)(ii)(II) for departing under a deportation order, but would not cure the resulting lack of continuous residence since 1/1/82. (Pedroza-Padilla v. Gonzales, 5/15/07)
CA7 Remands Claim of Chinese Christian Where IJ Quizzed Applicant on Bible
The court reversed the adverse credibility determination holding that the IJ impermissibly relied on his perceived common knowledge about the Bible when he concluded that Petitioner had only a rudimentary knowledge of Christianity.(Jiang v. Gonzales, 5/14/07)
Tracking ICE’s Enforcement Agenda
A summary of ICE enforcement activities prepared by the Detention Watch network. (Courtesy Detention Watch Network.)
CA7 Says Pre-Conviction Detention May Be Counted Toward Prison Term for §212(c) Purposes (Updated 5/22/07)
The court denied the petition for review, holding that pre-conviction detention, which is credited as time served, may be counted toward the term of imprisonment when determining eligibility for §212(c) relief. (Moreno-Cebrero v. Gonzales, 5/10/07)
CA2 Denies §212(c) Relief Notwithstanding Concurrent AOS
The court held that AEDPA §440(d) barred Petitioner, who was deportable for an aggravated felony, from relief under former INA §212(c) notwithstanding a concurrent adjustment application. (Ruiz-Almanzar v. Ridge, 5/8/07)
CA9 Holds Expedited Removal Order Interrupts Continuous Physical Presence
The court held that an expedited removal order interrupts continuous physical presence in the U.S. for purposes of cancellation of removal under INA §240A(b)(1). (Juarez-Ramos v. Gonzales, 5/8/07)
CA9 En Banc Court Finds Jurisdiction to Review Removal Orders “Reinstated” by the BIA
Overruling Molino-Camacho v. Ashcroft, the en banc court found jurisdiction over a petition for review where the BIA reversed the IJ’s grant of asylum and ordered Petitioner to voluntarily depart. (Lolong v. Gonzales, 5/7/07)
CA8 Finds Past FGM Is Persecution and Basis for Asylum
The court joined the growing number of circuits holding that FGM rises to the level of persecution. CA8 held here that the persecution was on account of her membership in the particular social group of Somali females. (Hassan v. Gonzales, 5/7/07)
CA10 Says IJ’s Finding of Deportability Constitutes a “Final Order” Under INA §242(a)(1)
The court held that an IJ must first either issue an order of removal or make a finding of deportability to confer it with appellate jurisdiction under INA 242(a)(1). (Sosa-Valenzuela v. Gonzales, 5/1/07)
CA10 Says INA §242(a)(2)(D) is Not an Independent Grant of Appellate Jurisdiction
CA10 held that its authority to review claims under INA 242(a)(2)(D) is constrained by INA 242(a)(1), which requires a final order of removal. Therefore, the court lacks jurisdiction to review the decision to revoke a visa without a final order of removal. (Hamilton v. Gonzales, 5/1/07)
Immigration Law Advisor, April 2007 (Vol. 1, No. 4)
Immigration Law Advisor with an article on calculating “loss to the victim or victims” under section 101(a)(43)(M)(i) of the INA, an article on Second Circuit rules on permissible inferences and speculation, federal court activity and recent BIA decisions for March 2007, and a regulatory update.
INS Juvenile Protocol Manual
This manual contains policy and guidance on issues related to the apprehension, processing, detention, and release of juvenile aliens.
CA3 Discusses Jurisdiction-Stripping and Transfer Provisions of REAL ID
In the context of §106 of the REAL ID Act, the court held that only challenges that directly implicate a removal order may be properly transferred. (Nnadika v. Att’y Gen., 4/27/07)
CA2 Upholds BIA’s Adverse Credibility Finding after Stipulated Remand
The court concluded that the BIA’s adverse credibility finding was not prohibited by the terms of CA2's stipulated remand, the regulatory scheme governing remands, or due process considerations. (Belortaja v. Gonzales, 4/27/07)