Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
DHS States USCIS Is Adjudicating DACA Renewals in Compliance with Court Injunctions
DHS issued a press statement on DACA, stating that in compliance with court injunctions, USCIS is adjudicating requests for DACA renewals as they are submitted but is not accepting requests from individuals not previously granted deferred action under DACA.
Assumption of Risk: Legal Liabilities for Local Governments that Choose to Enforce Federal Immigration Laws
Report by AILA, the Council, NIJC, NILC, and SPLC on ICE detainer requests to local law enforcement agencies, the history and constitutional and legal framework of such detainers, and the non-legal consequences of local law enforcement officers acting as immigration agents.
AILA Quicktake #237: DACA Deadline Passes
AILA's Director of Government Relations Greg Chen shares where things stand with the DACA program now that the March 5 deadline has passed and looks ahead to the spending bill that must be passed by March 23 to fund the government.
Civil Rights Report Describes Legal Liabilities for Local Police that Detain Immigrants for ICE
AILA and four other organizations issued a press release about their new report detailing the illegalities inherent in each of the U.S. government’s attempts to enlist local law enforcement authorities to arrest and detain people on behalf of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
House Republicans Sign Letter in Response to Lawsuits Regarding Voluntary Institutional Work at Detention Center Facilities
On March 7, 2018, 18 House Republicans signed a letter to the DOJ, the DOL, and ICE urging them to participate in pending litigation or issue guidance to oppose the claims of several lawsuits. The lawsuits were filed against Contract Detention Facilities for paying detainees $1 per day for labor.
CRS Report: Explanation and Takeaways on District Court Cases Related to DACA Phase-Out
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) provides a Legal Sidebar with information on the impact of recent litigation related to the DACA phase-out.
Executive Actions Issued on the Border and Interior Enforcement
Documents relating to the two Executive Orders signed on January 25, 2017, relating the border and interior enforcement.
AG Refers and Vacates Decision on Entitlement to Full Asylum Hearing
Attorney General Jeff Sessions referred the BIA decision in Matter of E-F-H-L- to himself for review and vacated that decision, directing that the matter be recalendared and restored to the active docket. Matter of E-F-H-L-, 27 I&N Dec. 226 (A.G. 2018)
BIA Dismisses DHS Appeal as Moot Following Issuance of Immigrant Visa
Unpublished BIA decision dismisses as moot a DHS appeal challenging the termination of proceedings following approval of a provisional unlawful presence waiver because the respondent was issued an immigrant visa while the appeal was pending. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Arroyo, 3/5/18)
CA9 Finds Violation of California Penal Code §286(i) to Be an Aggravated Felony
The court found that a violation of California Penal Code §286(i) for sodomy where the victim cannot consent qualifies as a rape offense under INA §101(a)(43)(A), and that the plaintiff’s conviction under that statute was therefore an aggravated felony. (Elmakhzoumi v. Sessions, 3/1/18)
EOIR Releases Fact Sheet on BIA Emergency Stay Requests
EOIR released a fact sheet on BIA emergency stay requests, including contact information and how an emergency stay request is made.
ProPublica: Have You Seen ICE or Border Patrol in Your Community?
ProPublica and Univision News want to learn more about where ICE and CBP are conducting operations, and how they are affecting you. Has an immigration enforcement action impacted you or someone you know?
BIA Rescinds In Absentia Order Because Attorney Failed to Notify Respondent of Hearing
Unpublished BIA decision rescinds in absentia order where attorney who received hearing notice conceded that he failed to notify the respondent of the hearing. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Jiminez, 3/1/18)
CA1 Finds Evidence Did Not Compel Conclusion That Violence Against Petitioner’s Family Members Was Due to Family Membership
The court denied the petition for review of the denial of the petitioner’s asylum application, finding that the evidence did not compel the conclusion that a series of violent incidents against her family members was on account of their family membership. (Sosa-Perez v. Sessions, 2/28/18)
CA2 Finds There Is No Duress Exception to the “Material Support Bar”
The court joined several other circuits in holding that the “material support bar” in INA §212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI) does not except individuals who acted under duress. (Hernandez v. Sessions, 2/28/18)
CA5 Dismisses Equitable Tolling Case for Lack of Jurisdiction
Where the petitioner filed a statutorily untimely motion to reopen but argued she was entitled to equitable tolling, the court dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction, finding that whether equitable tolling applied was a question of fact, not of law. (Penalva v. Sessions, 2/28/18)
BIA Holds Possession of Drug Paraphernalia in Arizona Is Not a Controlled Substance Offense
Unpublished BIA decision holds that possession of drug paraphernalia under Ariz. Rev. Stat. 13-3415(A) is not a controlled substance offense because Arizona’s drug schedules contain substances not listed on the federal schedule. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Arreaza-Oliva, 2/28/18)
SCOTUS Jennings Decision Won’t Be the Last Word on Bond Hearings for Immigrants
AILA reacted to and explained today’s Supreme Court decision in Jennings v. Rodriguez; AILA President Annaluisa Padilla emphasized that the decision “does not mean that immigrants may be detained indefinitely and it does not mean that prolonged detention is constitutional.”
AILA Quicktake #236: Jennings v. Rodriguez Ruling
The Supreme Court ruled in Jennings v. Rodriguez that detained immigrants have no automatic right to bail. Jeremy McKinney, AILA Secretary, shares details and discusses the impact of this decision.
Supreme Court Holds That INA §§235(b), 236(a), and 236(c) Do Not Entitle Noncitizens in Prolonged Immigration Detention to Bond Hearings
The Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and remanded, holding that INA §§235(b), 236(a), and 236(c) do not give detained noncitizens the right to periodic bond hearings during the course of their detention. (Jennings v. Rodriguez, 2/27/18)
EOIR Final Rule Expanding the Size of the BIA to 21
EOIR final rule adding four additional Board member positions to the BIA, thereby expanding its size to 21. The rule is effective 2/27/18. (83 FR 8321, 2/27/18)
District Court Judge Orders Bond or Joseph Hearings for Individuals in Withholding-Only Proceedings in Virginia
A federal district court judge in Virginia issued an opinion and order certifying a class of petitioners and directing the government to provide bond or Joseph hearings to individuals detained in withholding-only proceedings in Virginia. (Cabrera Diaz v. Hott, 2/26/18)
Fearless Litigation: Psychological Evaluations - How They Help Your Case and How to Obtain Them (February 2018)
Zachary Nightingale talks with Holly Cooper, Katie Shepherd, and Dr. Alan Shapiro about the importance of the procurement and use of mental health status evaluations in immigration court, especially for detained clients.
California District Court Enjoins Termination of an Individual’s DACA Status Without Notice
A federal district court in California issued an order preliminarily enjoining the government from terminating an individual’s DACA status without notice, a reasoned explanation, and an opportunity to be heard. (Inland Empire – Immigrant Youth Collective v. Nielsen, 2/26/18)
IJ Finds Respondent Established Persecution on Perceived LGBTI Identity
In an unpublished decision, the IJ granted the respondent’s application for asylum, finding he established that he suffered persecution on account of his perceived LGBTI identity and the Guatemalan government is unable to control his persecutors. Courtesy of Brian Blackford.