Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
DHS Notice of Modification of “DHS/ICE-013 Alien Health Records System” System of Records
DHS notice of the proposed modification and reissuance of the “DHS/ICE-013 Alien Health Records System” system of records, which contains health records on ICE detainees. Comments are due 4/18/18. (83 FR 12015, 3/19/18)
CA1 Upholds Denial of Asylum Where Evidence Showed Persecution Was Based on an Economic Motive
The court denied the petition for review, finding that substantial evidence showed that the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for asylum by failing to show a nexus between his alleged persecution and a statutorily protected ground. (Lopez-Lopez v. Sessions, 3/16/18)
United States Commission on Civil Rights Sends Letter to ICE Regarding Immigration Enforcement Actions Inside Courthouses
On March 16, 2018, the United States Commission on Civil Rights wrote a letter to Thomas Homan, Deputy Director of ICE, regarding recent immigration enforcement actions inside of courthouses. The commission urged ICE to stop these practices and classify courthouses as sensitive locations.
CA11 Finds Government Did Not Meet Burden to Show Asylum Petitioner Could Relocate Within China
In an unpublished opinion, the court remanded the case to the BIA, holding that the government did not meet its burden to show that the Chinese Christian petitioner could relocate within China to avoid persecution. Courtesy of Henry Zhang. (Shi v. Attorney General, 3/15/18)
BIA Finds California Attempted Voluntary Manslaughter to Be an Aggravated Felony Under INA §101(a)(43)(F)
The BIA held that attempted voluntary manslaughter in violation of §§192(a) and 664 of the California Penal Code is categorically an aggravated felony crime of violence under INA §101(a)(43)(F). Matter of Cervantes Nunez, 27 I&N Dec. 238 (BIA 2018)
CA3 Finds Counsel’s No-Show at Reasonable-Fear Screening Didn’t Warrant Relief
The court denied the petitions for review, determining that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his due process rights were violated when an immigration judge reviewed a negative reasonable fear determination without his attorney present. (Bonilla v. Sessions, 3/15/18)
BIA Upholds Grant of Motion to Suppress
Unpublished BIA decision upholds decision granting motion to suppress and terminating proceedings where ICE officers entered the respondent’s apartment without a warrant or consent. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Cabrera, 3/15/18)
CA7 Finds Mexican Petitioner Did Not Meet Burden to Establish Eligibility for Withholding of Removal or CAT Relief
The court denied the petition for review, finding that the petitioner did not meet his burden in establishing that he would be subject to future persecution or torture, and that he was thus not entitled to withholding of removal or relief under the CAT. (Cruz-Martinez v. Sessions, 3/14/18)
AILA Quicktake #238: Cogs in the Deportation Machine
AILA's Kate Voigt previews AILA's new report, Cogs in the Deportation Machine, which surveys policy changes to immigration enforcement made by the Trump administration.
BIA Finds Adjudicators May Look to Multiple Provisions of the CSA to Determine if an Offense Is an Aggravated Felony Under INA §101(a)(43)(B)
The BIA held that in deciding whether a state offense is an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(B), adjudicators need not look solely to the provision of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) most similar to the state statute of conviction. Matter of Rosa, 27 I&N Dec. 228 (BIA 2018)
AILA Report “Cogs in the Deportation Machine” Shows Massive Escalation of Immigration Enforcement
AILA released a new report detailing how the Trump administration has systematically increased enforcement, using harsh, indiscriminate methods to deport thousands of families, asylum seekers, and people who have lived and worked for years in the United States.
The Deportation Machine Destroys Lives
Kate Voigt, chief editor of AILA's new report, Cogs in the Deportation Machine, highlights how “the administration has gone to great lengths to deport as many people as possible, as quickly as possible, with little regard for the financial cost or the impact upon American communities.“
Practice Pointer: Matter of W-Y-C & H-O-B and Articulating Particular Social Groups Before the IJ
AILA’s Asylum and Refugee Committee provides a practice pointer addressing the January 2018 BIA precedential decision in Matter of W-Y-C- & H-O-B and its potential effects on how practitioners should prepare particular social group-based asylum claims.
Tri-Caucus Letter Urges Congressional Leaders to Reject Increased Funding for Deportation
On 3/13/18, Chairs of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, and the Congressional Black Caucus signed a letter urging the House and Senate Leaders to reject funding increases for Trump’s mass deportation agenda in the 2018 omnibus appropriations bill.
CA2 Finds Failure to Inform Defendant of Immigration Consequences of Guilty Plea Was Not Harmless Error
The court held that the district court’s failure to inform the defendant of the potential immigration consequences of his guilty plea was not harmless error. The court vacated the judgment of the district court and remanded. (U.S. v. Gonzales, 3/13/18)
H.Res. 774: “Queen-of-the-Hill” Resolution on Dreamers
On 3/13/18, Representative Jeff Denham (R-CA) introduced H.Res.774 with 17 original Republican cosponsors. The resolution would require the U.S. House of Representatives to consider four bills under a “Queen of the Hill” rule to address Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients.
BIA Finds Theft of Department of Treasury Funds Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds that theft of Department of Treasury funds under 18 USC §641 is not a CIMT because it does not require either an intent to permanently deprive the owner of property or to defraud. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Husti, 3/13/18)
CA11 Finds That Petitioner’s Florida Cocaine Trafficking Conviction Was Not an Aggravated Felony
Relying on its recent decision in Cintron v. Attorney General, the court held that the petitioner’s conviction for trafficking in cocaine under Fla. Stat. §893.135(1)(b)1.c was not an aggravated felony and remanded the case to the BIA. (Ulloa Francisco v. Attorney General, 3/12/18)
Law Student Perspective: The Somali 92
AILA Law Student members Mary Georgevich and Alexis Dutt share their experiences working with detained Somali refugees in Florida.
CA9 Finds Requirement to Accept Asylum Petitioner’s Testimony as True Where IJ and BIA Did Not Make Adverse Credibility Determination
The court granted the petition for review of the denial of asylum and withholding of removal, finding that because neither the IJ nor the BIA made an explicit adverse credibility determination, the court was required to accept the petitioner’s testimony as true. (Dai v. Sessions, 3/8/18)
CA2 Holds That BIA Erred by Retroactively Applying Matter of Diaz-Lizarraga
The court held that the BIA erred by retroactively applying the standard announced in Matter of Diaz-Lizarraga for larceny crimes involving moral turpitude to the petitioner’s case and remanded the case to the BIA. (Obeya v. Sessions, 3/8/18)
AG Refers Decision to Himself and Issues Amicus Invitation on “Particular Social Group” and Victims of Private Criminal Activity
The Attorney General referred Matter of A-B- to himself for review of issues relating to whether being a victim of private criminal activity constitutes a cognizable “particular social group” for purposes of an application for asylum and withholding of removal.
The End of Immigration Enforcement Priorities Under the Trump Administration
The American Immigration Council provides a fact sheet that explains the shift in enforcement philosophy under the Trump administration and outlines the effects of this change. This approach to enforcement diverts the attention of law enforcement agencies from those who are serious public threats.
CA7 Finds Lack of Jurisdiction to Review Whether Petitioner Waived Her Appeal Rights
The court dismissed the petition for review, finding that it lacked jurisdiction to review the question of whether the petitioner had waived her appeal rights. (Melesio-Rodriguez v. Sessions, 3/7/18)
Featured Issue: Detainers
Updates and resources related to detainers, including AILA press statements, reports, and testimonies.