Featured Issues

Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0

The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.

Latest Updates

Take action now.

Urge Congress to hold the executive branch accountable for systemic attack on immigration courts.
TAKE ACTION

Updates from EOIR

Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
1,076 - 1,100 of 12,970 collection items
Client Flyers

Flyer: Beware of ICE Imposters

In response to an uptick in people representing themselves as ICE personnel for fraudulent gain, ICE provides a flyer that warns of this type of fraud and how to detect it. The flyer is available in English and Spanish.

7/21/22 AILA Doc. No. 22072151. Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Press Releases

AILA President Jeremy McKinney Responds to SCOTUS Move Keeping ICE Priorities On Hold

In this statement, AILA President Jeremy McKinney responds to the U.S. Supreme Court 5-4 vote to maintain a nationwide injunction blocking the Biden Administration from setting prosecutorial discretion policies for ICE. The court also decided to take up the case in December.

7/21/22 AILA Doc. No. 22072152. Prosecutorial Discretion, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Upholds BIA’s Denial of Motion to Reopen and Finds That Petitioner Failed to Act Diligently in Pursuing Her Rights

The court upheld the BIA’s finding that petitioner was not entitled to equitable tolling of the statutory deadline to file a motion to reopen, because while she had shown exceptional circumstances, she had not shown that she diligently pursued her rights. (Masin-Ventura v. Garland, 7/21/22)

7/21/22 AILA Doc. No. 22080102. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Practice Alert: Virginia IAC Cases Can Be Appealed to Fourth Circuit

As a result of a recent federal court decision, respondents can now file a petition for review with the Fourth Circuit in any case decided by an immigration judge at an Immigration Adjudication Center (IAC) situated within the Fourth Circuit’s jurisdiction.

7/20/22 AILA Doc. No. 22072002. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Practice Alert: EOIR Taking Select Cases Off Docket Pursuant to Chief Immigration Judge Memo

AILA provides a practice alert explaining Chief Immigration Judge Short’s memo that moves certain cases that “are not ripe for adjudication” off the immigration court dockets.

7/20/22 AILA Doc. No. 22072003. Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Correspondence

AILA and Partners Call on Biden Administration to End MPP Following Supreme Court Decision

In light of the SCOTUS ruling in Biden v. Texas, immigrant and refugee rights organizations and service providers sent a letter urging the Administration to take immediate action to wind down the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) and redress the harm suffered by those subjected to it.

7/20/22 AILA Doc. No. 22072004. Admissions & Border, Asylum, Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Correspondence

AILA Joins Groups in Urging DHS to Ensure SCOTUS Dobbs Decision Has No Impact on Immigration Enforcement

Immigration, criminal justice, and civil rights organizations urged DHS to immediately issue guidance to prevent the Supreme Court’s rights-stripping decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization from being used against noncitizens seeking reproductive health care in the U.S.

7/19/22 AILA Doc. No. 22071902. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Says Petitioner Subject to Reinstated Removal Order May Not Challenge Earlier Termination of Separate Removal Proceedings

Dismissing the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction, the court held that a petitioner who is subject to a reinstated order of removal may not challenge an earlier decision terminating separate removal proceedings. (Lopez Luvian v. Garland, 7/19/22)

7/19/22 AILA Doc. No. 22080432. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA11 Upholds Denial of Motion to Reopen Where Petitioner Failed to Inform Government of New Address

The court held that although the petitioner’s first Notice to Appear was incomplete, the petitioner’s failure to tell the government where he had moved released the government from any obligation of giving him notice of his rescheduled hearing. (Dacostagomez-Aguilar v. Att’y Gen., 7/19/22)

7/19/22 AILA Doc. No. 22080433. Removal & Relief
AILA Blog

Abuse in ICE Detention Continues and So Does the Funding for It

AILA Policy Counsel Jen Whitlock describes the reports and examples of harmful, unnecessary, and wasteful ICE detention and urges readers to take action and tell Congress to reduce ICE detention bed funding for Fiscal Year 2023.

Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA and Partners Submit Amicus Brief on Challenging Mandatory Detention

AILA and partners submitted an amicus brief in Alphonse v. Moniz urging the court to reverse decision on whether an individual can challenge a mandatory detention finding via habeas while also challenging the deportability consequences of the conviction in removal proceedings.

7/14/22 AILA Doc. No. 22072001. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE Updates Policy on Interests of Noncitizen Parents and Legal Guardians of Minor Children or Incapacitated Adults

ICE Directive 11064.3 updates policies to ensure parents and legal guardians arrested or detained by ICE can maintain visitation with their child(ren) or the incapacitated adult for whom they serve as guardian, coordinate care, and participate in any related court or child welfare proceedings.

7/14/22 AILA Doc. No. 22071401. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Practice Alert: Affirmative Prosecutorial Discretion Requests May Still Be Made

AILA’s ICE Liaison Committee shares OPLA’s confirmation that affirmative prosecutorial discretion requests may still be made despite litigation surrounding the Mayorkas enforcement priorities memo.

7/13/22 AILA Doc. No. 22062752. Prosecutorial Discretion, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Resources for IJ Complaint Project

The Immigration Justice Campaign provides resources for IJ Complaint Project.

7/12/22 AILA Doc. No. 22071299. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Steps and Timeline for Judicial Complaints

The Immigration Justice Campaign provides steps and timeline for judicial complaints.

7/12/22 AILA Doc. No. 22071298. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

Follow Litigation over Asylum Processing Interim Final Rule

Follow developments in the two separate cases challenging the Biden Administration’s interim final rule (IFR) on asylum processing in federal court. The IFR went into effect on May 31, 2022.

7/11/22 AILA Doc. No. 22042805. Admissions & Border, Asylum, Expedited Removal, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA6 Grants Motion for Stay to Dominican Petitioner with Strong Showing of Irreparable Harm

Where the parties agreed that petitioner would likely be tortured if removed to the Dominican Republic, the court granted the motion for a stay, finding that his arguments presented a sufficient likelihood of success to weigh in favor of granting a stay. (Rondon Antonio v. Garland, 6/29/22)

7/11/22 AILA Doc. No. 22071113. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Says That a Grant of TPS Does Not Constitute an Admission to the United States

The court held that petitioner’s receipt of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) was not an admission, and thus that he did not have seven years of continuous residence in the United States required for purposes of lawful permanent resident cancellation of removal. (Hernandez v. Garland, 6/28/22)

Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

Interest Rate Paid on Cash Deposited To Secure ICE Immigration Bonds

ICE immigration bond interest rate for the period beginning July 1, 2022, and ending on September 30, 2022. (87 FR 40883, 7/8/22)

7/8/22 AILA Doc. No. 22071135. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Finds Petitioner Forfeited Right to Notice by Failing to Provide Viable Mailing Address

The court upheld the BIA’s denial of the petitioner’s motion to reopen and rescind his in absentia removal order based on lack of notice, finding that by moving without providing an address where he could be reached, he had forfeited his right to notice. (Gudiel-Villatoro v. Garland, 7/8/22)

7/8/22 AILA Doc. No. 22080301. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Says USCIS Did Not Err in Applying IIRAIRA’s Permanent Inadmissibility Bar to Petitioner’s Pre-IIRAIRA Reentry

The court held that the permanent inadmissibility bar of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) applied retroactively to the petitioner such that he was ineligible for adjustment of status. (Rivera Vega v. Garland, 7/8/22)

7/8/22 AILA Doc. No. 22080304. Adjustment of Status, Admissions & Border, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Remands Asylum Claim of Armenian Petitioner Where IJ’s Findings of Inconsistencies Were Not Supported by Record

Granting the petition for review of the denial of the Armenian petitioner’s asylum application, the court held that three out of four inconsistencies the BIA relied upon in upholding the IJ’s adverse credibility determination were not supported by the record. (Barseghyan v. Garland, 7/8/22)

7/8/22 AILA Doc. No. 22080306. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Upholds BIA’s Reversal of CAT Relief as to Mexican Petitioner Threatened by Familia Michoacan Cartel

Where the BIA had vacated the IJ’s grant of deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) and had ordered the petitioner removed to Mexico, the court held that the BIA had correctly stated and properly applied the clear error standard of review. (Brito v. Garland, 7/7/22)

7/7/22 AILA Doc. No. 22080303. Asylum, Removal & Relief

CRS In Focus Report: Access to Counsel in Removal Proceedings and Legal Access Programs

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) provides an In Focus report on removal proceedings and access to counsel, including legal access programs.

7/7/22 AILA Doc. No. 22071131. Removal & Relief
AILA Blog

Immigration and the Power of Storytelling

In this blog post, AILA member John Wheaton writes on the power of storytelling in bringing people together and creating community, encouraging his fellow attorneys to consider asking clients to share their stories and increase understanding of the immigrant experience.