Featured Issues

Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0

The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.

Latest Updates

Take action now.

Urge Congress to hold the executive branch accountable for systemic attack on immigration courts.
TAKE ACTION

Updates from EOIR

Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
12,351 - 12,375 of 12,971 collection items
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

AG and DHS Secretary are Proper Respondents in the CA9 (Decision Withdrawn by Court Order on 9/1/04)

The Ninth Circuit concluded that the proper respondents in a habeas petition under 28 USC 2241 are the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General. This holding differs from First and Sixth Circuit decisions. (Armentero v. INS, 8/26/03)

8/26/03 AILA Doc. No. 03101414. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Practice Alert: Pilot Program in Hartford to Detain Respondents after Merits Hearings (Revised 8/25/03)

AILA's Connecticut chapter reports that the Hartford BICE is detaining respondents who do not win at their merits hearings. There have been indications that this is a pilot program that the DHS hopes to expand nationwide.

8/25/03 AILA Doc. No. 03081499. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Liaison Minutes

Minutes from State Bar of Texas Meeting with AILA (8/23/03)

The 8/23/03 State Bar of Texas Committee minutes cover the following topics: backlogs, procedures, policies and staffing levels at TSC, as well as discussions with Kenneth Pasquarell (Central Regional Director of CIS) and Evelyn Upchurch (Director of CIS' TSC).

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Finds Pre-St. Cyr Waiver of Appeal Invalid

The Ninth Circuit found that a 1997 waiver of a right to appeal is invalid because an IJ informed the respondent that he was not eligible for relief, thus retroactively applying 1996 and 1997 laws to a 1995 conviction. (U.S. v. Leon-Paz, 8/22/03)

8/22/03 AILA Doc. No. 03101416. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA3 Allows District Court Habeas Review of CAT Claim

Referencing St. Cyr, the court concluded that district court habeas review of the denial of a claim for relief under the Convention Against Torture is available. (Ogbudimpka v. Ashcroft, 8/22/03)

8/22/03 AILA Doc. No. 03101419. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Finds Travel Act Violation Is a Controlled Substance Offense

The court held that a conviction under the Travel Act referencing “a business enterprise involving cocaine” was a violation of a law “relating to” a controlled substance under INA §237(a)(1)(A). (Urena-Ramirez v. Ashcroft, 8/22/03)

8/22/03 AILA Doc. No. 03101014. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Limits St. Cyr Habeas Review to Questions of Law

CA5 upheld the dismissal of a habeas petition seeking review of a cancellation of removal hardship determination, finding that St. Cyr applies only to pure questions of law and not discretionary determinations. (Bravo v. Ashcroft, 8/22/03)

8/22/03 AILA Doc. No. 03101418. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Finds Jurisdiction to Review Request to Reinstate Asylum Application

The Ninth Circuit, analogizing to motions to reopen, concluded that it has jurisdiction to review a request to reinstate an asylum application after it had been withdrawn in favor of an application for cancellation of removal that was denied. (Mendez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 8/20/03)

8/20/03 AILA Doc. No. 03101415. Asylum, Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Finds Conviction for Making Terrorist Threats an Aggravated Felony

A conviction under California law for making terrorist threats was found to be a crime of violence constituting an aggravated felony. (Rosales-Rosales v. Ashcroft, 8/17/03)

8/17/03 AILA Doc. No. 03112122. Crimes, Removal & Relief

Office of Detention and Removal Strategic Plan, 2003 - 2012

Endgame is the ICE Office of Detention and Removal multi-year strategic enforcement plan that serves as the basis for operational and budgetary plans until 2012 and will build the capacity to “remove all removable aliens” and eliminate the backlog of unexecuted final order removal cases.

8/15/03 AILA Doc. No. 07070664. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR OPPM 03-05: Scheduling Leave, Approval of Leave Requests, and Time and Attendance Reports for Court Personnel

EOIR issues Operating Policies and Procedure Memorandum (OPPM) 03-05: Scheduling Leave, Approval of Leave Requests, and Time and Attendance Reports for Court Personnel, which replaces OPPM 98-04, dated August 27, 1998.

8/14/03 AILA Doc. No. 18020631. Removal & Relief
Media Tools

AILA Issue Paper on Access to Counsel

AILA Issue Paper on access to counsel, including representation in immigration matters adjudicated at ports of entry and representation in the interior since 9/11.

8/5/03 AILA Doc. No. 03080542. Detention & Bond, Expedited Removal, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Denies Discretionary Relief for Breaching Protective Order

The BIA held that Respondent is ineligible for any relief except for bond, because a protective order was violated by disclosure of information to unauthorized persons and that there are reasonable grounds for regarding Respondent as a danger to U.S. security. (Matter of R-S-H-, 8/4/03)

8/4/03 AILA Doc. No. 03080445. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Upholds BIA Streamlining Procedures

Court rejects due process challenge to BIA’s affirmance-without-opinion procedure. (Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 7/14/03)

7/14/03 AILA Doc. No. 03071740. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

DHS Implements "Operation Predator"

A recent DHS memo instructs DHS trial attorneys to "flag" cases in which an alien has been convicted of a criminal offense against children and to oppose bond, according to sources within the agency.

7/11/03 AILA Doc. No. 03071146. Crimes, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Announces New Local Operating Procedures for Buffalo & Batavia, NY

EOIR, on 7/1/03, posted to its website new local operating procedures for the Immigration Courts in Buffalo and Batavia, New York.

7/10/03 AILA Doc. No. 03071046. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Ohio & Kentucky Immigration Court Case Files Moved to New Sites as of 7/1/03

EOIR, in a 6/23/03 News Release, announced that the administrative control of Immigration Court case files, including Records of Proceedings, for Ohio and Kentucky was transferred to new locations, effective 7/1/03.

7/10/03 AILA Doc. No. 03071045. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Memo on Use of FedEx Delivery Services by Immigration Courts

EOIR Operating Policies and Procedures Memorandum (OPPM) 03-04, dated 7/9/03, provides guidance on the acceptable uses of FedEx Delivery Services by the immigration courts.

7/9/03 AILA Doc. No. 03071546. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Updates List of Internal Agency Case-Tracking Codes

EOIR Operating Policies and Procedures Memorandum (OPPM) 03-03, dated 7/8/03, revises and adds to the agency’s list of Adjournment, Call-up, and Case Identification Codes. The EOIR uses these codes primarily for case tracking purposes in the agency’s automated system.

7/8/03 AILA Doc. No. 03071545. Removal & Relief

Testimony of DOJ Inspector General on the Detention and Treatment of September 11 Detainees

Testimony of DOJ Inspector General, Glenn A. Fine, before the Senate Judiciary Committee, on June 25, concerning the detention and treatment of September 11 detainees.

7/2/03 AILA Doc. No. 03070213. Congress, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Says Presidential or Gubernatorial Pardon Waives Only 237(a)(2)(A)(v) Grounds

The BIA held that a presidential or gubernatorial pardon waives only grounds specified in INA §237(a)(2)(A)(v), and that the pardon did not waive removability for a crime under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i). (Matter of Suh, 7/1/03)

7/1/03 AILA Doc. No. 03070315. Crimes, Removal & Relief, Waivers
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Practice Alert: BICE Obtains Jurisdiction of Deferred Action

DHS representatives, speaking at the AILA annual conference, indicated that BICE now has sole jurisdiction over deferred action, including related EADs. This policy applies to VAWA-related deferred action as well.

6/25/03 AILA Doc. No. 03062543. Deferred Action, Prosecutorial Discretion, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

BIA Announces Email Notification Service/Telephone Information Line/Citations Guidelines

Information on how to obtain BIA information include an automatic email notification service for precedent decisions, a telephone information line, and a Citations Guideline.

6/25/03 AILA Doc. No. 03062540. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

BICE Cooperates with Nigerian Government to Remove 89 Nigerian Nationals to Lagos

BICE and the government of Nigeria cooperated in the removal of 89 Nigerians to Lagos this week. The U.S. government has recently worked with the governments of Pakistan, Cambodia, El Salvador, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, and the Philippines in similar removal missions.

6/13/03 AILA Doc. No. 03061343. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds Quashed Drug Conviction Still Valid for Immigration Purposes

The BIA held that a drug conviction that was quashed by a Canadian court solely for immigration purposes was not based on a defect in the conviction or in the underlying proceedings and was therefore, still valid for immigration purposes. (Matter of Pickering, 6/11/03)

6/11/03 AILA Doc. No. 03061145. Crimes, Removal & Relief