Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
CA8 Finds BIA Did Not Abuse Its Discretion in Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Reopen Based on Ineffective Assistance
The court upheld the BIA’s denial of the petitioner’s motion to reopen, finding that the petitioner had not substantially complied with the requirements in Matter of Lozada for reopening removal proceedings based on alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. (Avitso v. Barr, 9/22/20)
EOIR 30-Day Notice and Request for Comments on Proposed Revisions to Form EOIR-27
EOIR 30-day notice and request for comments on proposed revisions to Form EOIR-27, Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative Before the Board of Immigration Appeals. Comments are due 10/22/20. (85 FR 59549, 9/22/20)
DOJ OIG Releases Report on EOIR’s Recognition and Accreditation Program
DOJ OIG released a report on EOIR’s Recognition and Accreditation Program, finding that OLAP should improve program oversight and administration due to weakness in its controls for approving or rejecting applications, monitoring activities of accredited representatives, and investigating misconduct.
EOIR Resumes Hearings in Non-Detained Cases at the Los Angeles Immigration Courts
EOIR announced that it resumed non-detained individual (merits) hearings and master calendar dockets involving small numbers of respondents at the three Los Angeles immigration courts on September 21, 2020. The option to file by email at these courts will end on November 20, 2020.
CA1 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Ecuadorian Petitioner Who Feared Harm from Brother Involved in Narcotics Trafficking
The court held that the record supported the BIA’s and IJ’s conclusion that family ties did not motivate the petitioner’s persecution at the hands of his adopted older brother, even though those ties brought the petitioner into proximity with his persecutor. (Loja-Tene v. Barr, 9/21/20)
District Court Orders DHS to Stop Detaining Certain Minors in Hotels for More Than Three Days
The district court ordered DHS to stop placing minors detained pursuant to a public health order under Title 42 in hotels, except for brief hotel stays of no longer than 72 hours in the process of expelling them from the United States. (Flores, et al. v. Barr, et al., 9/21/20)
House Committee on Homeland Security Releases Report Saying ICE Detention Facilities Fail to Meet Basic Standards of Care
The House Committee on Homeland Security released a report finding that DHS fails to effectively identify and correct deficient conditions at ICE detention facilities, and that facilities frequently fail to meet basic standards of care, including mental and physical care of the migrants in custody.
CA2 Finds Petitioner’s Conviction in New York for Sexual Abuse in the First Degree Was an Aggravated Felony
The court held that the petitioner’s conviction under New York Penal Law §130.65(3) for sexual abuse in the first degree constituted an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(A). (Rodriguez v. Barr, 9/18/20)
CA2 Says Conviction for Third-Degree Criminal Possession of Stolen Property in New York Is an Aggravated Felony
The court upheld the BIA’s determination that the petitioner’s conviction for third-degree criminal possession of stolen property in violation of New York Penal Law §165.50 was an aggravated felony offense under INA §101(a)(43)(G). (Santana v. Barr, 9/18/20)
CA9 Holds That Petitioner’s Oregon Conviction for Manufacture of a Controlled Substance Was an Aggravated Felony
The court held that Oregon Revised Statute §475.992(1)(a) is divisible as between its “manufacture” and “delivery” terms, and that the petitioner’s conviction under that statute for manufacturing marijuana was thus an aggravated felony. (Dominguez v. Barr, 7/21/20, amended 9/18/20)
CA9 Says Conviction Under California Penal Code §245(a)(1) for Assault with a Deadly Weapon Other Than a Firearm Is a CIMT
Deferring to the BIA’s decision in Matter of Wu, the court held that a conviction under California Penal Code §245(a)(1), which proscribes certain aggravated forms of assault, is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). (Safaryan v. Barr, 9/17/20)
CA9 Finds Petitioner Was Properly in Asylum-Only Proceedings and IJ Lacked Jurisdiction to Consider Adjustment of Status Request
The court held that the termination of petitioner’s grant of asylum by reopening his asylum-only proceedings was not error, and that the IJ did not have jurisdiction to consider his request for adjustment of status because of the limited scope of such proceedings. (Bare v. Barr, 9/16/20)
AILA and Partners Send Letter Urging Congressional Leaders to Reject Extra Funding for CBP and ICE
AILA joined over 200 organizations in sending a letter urging congressional leaders to reject any anomalies or any other funding mechanisms that would increase funding for CBP or ICE in a FY2021 Continuing Resolution, stating that “filling these agencies’ coffers” even higher “would be reckless.”
EOIR Resumes Hearings in Non-Detained Cases at the Charlotte, Denver, and Orlando Immigration Courts
EOIR announced that it resumed non-detained individual (merits) hearings and master calendar dockets involving small number of respondents at the Charlotte, Denver, and Orlando immigration courts on September 14, 2020. The option to file by email at these courts will end on November 13, 2020.
TRAC Says It Will Release New Asylum Data, But Urges Caution with EOIR Data
TRAC announced it will again release data through its asylum tool, but notes that records are still missing from the data it receives from EOIR. TRAC says there is evidence that EOIR is mismanaging or misrepresenting the data it uses to evaluate IJs’ performance, support policy changes, and more.
Organizations Call for Immediate Investigation into Reports of Unnecessary Procedures and Inadequate Care in ICE Facility
In a joint statement, AILA and the American Immigration Council respond to reports of inadequate medical care and unnecessary hysterectomies in ICE detention.
CA1 Upholds Asylum Denial to Honduran Petitioner Who Feared Attacks Motivated by His Father’s Gang Affiliation
The court held that the petitioner did not meet his burden of showing that the government of Honduras was unwilling or unable to protect him, where the evidence in the record indicated that the police had investigated the threats and attacks against him. (Gómez-Medina v. Barr, 9/15/20)
CA3 Finds District Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Review Appellant’s Challenges to the Execution of His Removal Order
Where the appellant had raised two challenges to the execution of his removal order, the court found that he had pursued his claims in the wrong proceeding, and reversed and remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. (Tazu v. Att’y Gen., 9/14/20)
Senators Announce GAO Investigation of the Politicization and Mismanagement of Immigration Courts
On September 14, 2020, Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Dick Durbin (D-IL), and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) announced that the GAO will investigate the politicization of the immigration courts under the Trump administration and EOIR’s mismanagement of the immigration courts during the COVID-19 pandemic.
CA5 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Chinese Petitioner Who Claimed He Had an Anti-Corruption Political Belief
The court upheld the BIA’s denial of asylum to the Chinese petitioner, finding that the evidence did not compel a reasonable factfinder to conclude that the petitioner had been persecuted for his political opinion rather than for personal reasons. (Du v. Barr, 9/14/20)
CA9 Finds Record Showed That Salvadoran Government Was Unable to Control Gang’s Deadly Violence
The court held that substantial evidence did not support the BIA’s conclusion that the government of El Salvador was willing and able to control the Mara-18 gang that attacked the petitioner and killed his son, and found that the gang continues to be a threat. (J.R. v. Barr, 9/11/20)
CA9 Vacates Injunction Barring ICE from Issuing Detainers Based Solely on Electronic Database Checks
The court reversed and vacated the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California’s injunction barring ICE from issuing detainers based solely on searches of electronic databases to make probable cause determinations of removability. (Gonzalez, et al. v. ICE, et al., 9/11/20)
DHS Proposed Rule on Use and Collection of Biometrics
DHS proposed rule on the use and collection of biometrics in the enforcement and administration of immigration laws. Comments on the rule are due on 10/13/20, with comments on associated proposed form revisions due 11/10/20. (85 FR 56338, 9/11/20)
CA9 Holds BIA Applied Incorrect Standard When Reviewing IJ’s Factual Findings Related to Mexican Petitioner’s CAT Application
The court held that the BIA erred by not reviewing the IJ’s factual findings for clear error, as required by 8 CFR §1003.1(d)(3)(i), when it reversed the IJ’s grant of deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). (Guerra v. Barr, 3/3/20, amended 9/11/20)
TRAC Releases Report on Administrative Closure
TRAC analyzed historical data on EOIR administrative closures, and found that EOIR significantly misrepresented the data it used to justify its August 2020 proposed rule to eliminate administrative closure. Per TRAC, far from contributing to the backlog, administrative closure has helped reduce it.