Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
CA7 Finds Petitioner’s Kentucky Conviction for Complicity to Robbery in First Degree Was Aggravated Felony Crime of Violence
The court held that the BIA did not err in categorizing complicity to robbery in the first degree under Kentucky law as a crime of violence, and thus found that the petitioner was removable for having been convicted of an aggravated felony crime of violence. (Mwendapeke v. Garland, 12/7/23)
AILA Law Journal: An Article I Immigration Court
AILA shares an article by Mimi Tsankov from the fall 2023 edition of the AILA Law Journal, which discusses how an Article I court would help fix the broken and ineffective immigration court system.
AILA Law Journal, Vol. 5, Number 2, October 2023
The October 2023 edition of the AILA Law Journal is now available.
Pro Bono
Devoting time and professional skill to public service is a hallmark of the legal profession. Pro bono service is both professionally and personally rewarding, and AILA offers resources to assist members to locate opportunities as well as incorporate this service into their practices.
CA5 Says BIA Erred in Upholding Withholding of Removal and CAT Denial to Salvadoran Petitioner
The court held that the BIA misapplied prevailing case law, disregarded crucial evidence, and failed to adequately support its decisions in upholding the IJ’s denial of the petitioner’s withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture (CAT) claims. (Argueta-Hernandez v. Garland, 12/5/23)
CA8 Finds Petitioner’s Minnesota Conviction for Sexual Abuse of a Minor Was an Aggravated Felony
The court held that the BIA did not err in adopting the definition of sexual abuse of a minor in 18 USC §3509(a)(8) to determine that the petitioner’s Minnesota conviction for sexual abuse of a minor qualified as an aggravated felony for removal purposes. (Aguilar-Sanchez v. Garland, 12/4/2
BIA Finds Family Membership Incidental to Other Ultimate Goal Is Not One Central Reason for Harm in Asylum Analysis
The BIA held that, for purposes of establishing asylum eligibility, if a persecutor is targeting members of a family as a means of achieving some other goal, family membership is incidental to that goal and not one central reason for the harm. Matter of M–R–M–S–, 28 I&N Dec. 757 (BIA 2023)
ICE Announces Online Portal that Centralizes Communications Between Noncitizens and ICE
ICE launched the ICE Portal, a public-facing website that centralizes communications between noncitizens and the federal government. Within this online portal, noncitizens can schedule appointments, update their address, and check immigration court hearing information in a consolidated location.
CA9 Finds That Petitioner’s Conviction in Idaho for Possessing Methamphetamine Qualified as an Aggravated Felony
Denying the petition for review, the court held that the petitioner’s conviction in Idaho for possessing a controlled substance with intent to deliver qualified as a drug trafficking aggravated felony that rendered him removable. (Tellez-Ramirez v. Garland, 11/29/23)
Potential Game-Changer Cases for Immigration Law at SCOTUS
AILA Members and litigation experts Brian Green and Stephen Yale-Loehr describe three SCOTUS cases that could have significant implications for the practice of immigration law; the legitimacy of the current U.S. immigration court system could be undermined depending on the rulings.
CA1 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Nepali Petitioner Who Was Attacked by Maoist Insurgents
The court held that the Nepali army’s prompt response to the attack on the petitioner and her family in their home reasonably supported the government’s willingness to take action to protect the petitioner from her Maoist persecutors. (Singh v. Garland, 11/27/23)
DHS Announces Resumption of Removals of Venezuelans
DHS announced that it will resume direct repatriations of Venezuelan nationals who do not have a legal basis to remain in the United States.
Practice Alert: Updated Forms for EOIR’s Recognition & Accreditation Program
As of November 3, 2023, EOIR requires that the new Recognition & Accreditation forms, EOIR-31, EOIR-31A, be used when applying for DOJ recognition of organizations and accredited representatives. EOIR will return applications submitted after November 3, 2023, that do not use the new forms.
EOIR 30-Day Notice and Request for Comment on Proposed Revisions to Form EOIR-59
EOIR 30-day notice and request for comment on proposed revisions to Form EOIR-59, Certification and Release of Records. Comments are due 12/22/23. (88 FR 81434, 11/22/23)
AILA, AIC, and ACLU Lead Sign-On Letter Detailing Continued Barriers to Attorney Access in ICE Immigration Detention Facilities
AILA, AIC, and the ACLU lead over 80 organizations in a letter to ICE detailing continued barriers to attorney access in immigration detention facilities and provide recommendations on how to better facilitate critical communications between counsel and detained individuals.
AILA and the Council Seek Information on the Family Expedited Removal Management (FERM) Program
AILA and the American Immigration Council filed a FOIA request to obtain documents related to ICE and CBP’s implementation of the Family Expedited Removal Management Program (FERM).
CA9 Says Exclusionary Rule of Miranda v. Arizona Did Not Apply Where Petitioner Was Arrested Pursuant to Administrative Warrant
The court upheld the IJ’s and BIA’s denial of the petitioner’s motion to suppress, rejecting his argument that he should have received Miranda warnings because he was apprehended by immigration officers pursuant to an administrative warrant. (Zuniga De La Cruz v. Garland, 11/17/23)
CA1 Holds That Notice to Petitioner Was Properly Accomplished Based on Applicable Regulations and USCIS Policy
The court rejected the petitioner’s argument that USCIS had failed to properly serve him with the notice of its intent to revoke his visa petition, concluding that notice was properly accomplished based on the applicable regulations and USCIS policy. (Manguriu v. Garland, 11/16/23)
CA4 Finds That BIA’s Withholding-Only Order Was Not a Final Order of Removal Under INA §242(b)(1)
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction under INA §242(b)(1) to review the BIA’s withholding-only order, finding that the pendency of the petitioner’s withholding-only proceedings did not extend his time to file and thus that the petition was untimely. (Martinez v. Garland, 11/16/23)
CA4 Grants Panel Rehearing in Ullah v. Garland at Request of Attorney General
At the request of the Attorney General, the court granted the petition for panel rehearing and modified its opinion to the extent that it remanded the case to the Attorney General for further proceedings. (Ullah v. Garland, 10/12/23)
CA1 Upholds Asylum Denial to Guatemalan Petitioner of Mam Ethnicity Who Experienced Unfulfilled Threats from Gangs
The court held that the petitioner failed to establish past persecution based on two incidents with gang members in Guatemala City, and found that he did not show a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of his indigenous Mam ethnicity. (Hernandez-Mendez v. Garland, 11/15/23)
Featured Issue: Asylum and Credible Fear Interim Final Rule
A USCIS interim final rule on credible fear and asylum took effect May 31, 2022, and changes the way DHS processes asylum cases for individuals in expedited removal. This is a resource page to help immigration attorneys understand the new process for credible fear and asylum.
CA2 Finds Petitioner’s Conviction for Abuse of a Corpse in Arkansas Was Not a CIMT
The court held that the petitioner’s conviction for abuse of a corpse in violation of Arkansas Code Annotated §5-60-101 was not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). (Giron-Molina v. Garland, 6/20/23, amended 11/14/23)
Recommendations on Protecting Individuals Impacted by the Middle East Conflict
AILA urged the Administration to take immediate comprehensive action to ensure the safety and security of all people impacted by the conflict in the Middle East and must take affirmative steps to ensure that individuals are not forced to return to danger in the middle of the conflict.
CA1 Upholds Denial of Asylum as to Salvadoran Petitioner Who Was Threatened with Extortion by Gangs as a Teenager
Although the court agreed with petitioner that the BIA erred by failing to evaluate the severity of her mistreatment as a teenager through the eyes of a child, it held that she had not shown a connection between her mistreatment and any protected ground. (Varela-Chavarria v. Garland, 11/9/23)