Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
Changes to Seattle Immigration Court Procedures Proposed
EOIR proposes to alter the Seattle local operating procedures by requiring leave from court to file documents in excess of 150 pages per family unit.
BIA on Burden of Proof in Motions to Reopen
The BIA held that where an alien has filed an untimely motion to reopen alleging that the INS failed to prove removability, the burden of proof shifts to the alien to demonstrate that an exceptional situation exists to warrant the BIA to reopen on its own motion. (Matter of Beckford, 1/19/00)
INS Use of Prosecutorial Discretion to Avoid Harsh Consequences of IIRAIRA
A 1/19/00 letter from Robert Raben, Assistant Attorney General (INS) regarding the INS' use of prosecutorial discretion to avoid the harsh consequences of IIRAIRA.
AILA Lacks Standing to Challenge IIRAIRA
DC Circuit holds that AILA and other organizational plaintiffs lack standing to challenge expedited removal provisions of IIRAIRA and implementing regulations. (AILA v. Reno, 1/11/00)
BIA Interprets "Permanently Ineligible for Citizenship"
The BIA held that an alien convicted of an aggravated felony is not inadmissible under INA §212(a)(8)(A) as an alien who is permanently ineligible for citizenship and that 212(a)(8)(A) only encompasses those barred from naturalization for evasion of military service. (Matter of Kanga, 1/7/00)
Error Coram Nobis Writ to Avoid IIRAIRA Impact
The SDNY granted a writ of error coram nobis to reduce a prison term from a year and a day to the 10 months served, specifically for the purpose of avoiding IIRAIRA's retroactive impact on what is now considered an aggravated felony. (U.S. v. Ko,)
BIA Finds Writ of Error Coram Nobis Warrants Termination of Proceedings
In an unpublished decision, the BIA held that respondent's success in obtaining a writ of error coram nobis which reduced his sentence for conspiracy to commit robbery from 366 days to 10 months warranted termination of proceedings. (Matter of Corso, 12/29/99)
CA9 Rebuffs Soriano
The court refused to follow Soriano, holding that AEDPA §440(d) does not apply to deportation cases pending when AEDPA was passed, and that AEDPA and IIRAIRA do not repeal habeas relief under 28 USC §2241. (Magana-Pizano v. INS, 12/27/99)
BIA Says Arizona Aggravated DUI Is a CIMT
The BIA held that a conviction under Arizona law for an aggravated DUI, which requires knowledge that the driver is prohibited from driving, is a crime involving moral turpitude. (Matter of Lopez-Meza, 12/21/99)
BIA Press Release on BIA Practice Manual
The BIA has issued three new publications to provide basic information to individuals involved in immigration proceedings and to answer FAQs about how the appeals process works at the Board.
BIA on Interpreting the Aggravated Felony Definition
The BIA held that where an appellate court interprets the aggravated felony definition for purposes of a criminal sentence enhancement, the BIA may interpret it differently for purposes of implementing the immigration laws in cases arising within that circuit. (Matter of K-V-D-, 12/10/99)
INS General Counsel List of Resolved Issues
The INS General Counsel has provided a list of 21 issues that have been resolved through AILA liaison. Among other things, various unlawful presence and 245(i) questions are addressed.
INS General Counsel Opines on Administrative Closure
A 12/7/99 memo from Bo Cooper, General Counsel (INS) providing guidance on administrative closure of proceedings for non-permanent residents eligible for repapering.
EOIR Report: Evaluation of the Rights Presentation
During FY1998, the EOIR funded a short-term pilot project designed to augment the due process information detainees receive from immigration judges. Three nonprofit organizations provided daily “rights presentations” to INS detainees. This report provides a summary of the evaluation findings.
BIA Says "Reasonable Cause" Standard Applies to MTR In Absentia Proceedings
The BIA held that when an alien seeks to reopen in absentia proceedings, it is appropriate to apply the "reasonable cause" standard, not the "exceptional circumstances" standard set forth in INA §242B. (Matter of Cruz-Garcia, 11/30/99)
BIA on Confidentiality of SAW Applications
The BIA held that information provided in an application to adjust an alien’s status to that of a lawful temporary resident under INA §210 is confidential and prohibited from use in rescission proceedings under INA §246. (Matter of Masri, 11/30/99)
BIA on Change in Law as Basis for Sua Sponte Reopening
The BIA held that in order for a change in law to qualify as exceptional situation meriting sua sponte reopening or reconsideration, the change must be fundamental in nature and not merely an incremental development. (Matter of G-D-, 11/23/99)
AILA/AILF Submit Comments on Expedited Removal Regulations
AILA, AILF, and other groups submit comments to INS on its planned pilot program authorizing expedited removal of certain aliens incarcerated in three Texas facilities.
BIA Overturns IJ's Denial of NACARA Suspension
In an unpublished decision dated 11/15/99, the BIA sustained the appeal of the immigration judge’s denial of suspension of deportation under §203 of the Nicaraguan and Central American Relief Act of 1997 (NACARA).
DOJ Exempts EOIR Files from Privacy Act
DOJ final rule exempting EOIR system of records "Practitioner Complaint/Disciplinary Files," (Justice /EOIR-003) from the Privacy Act. Rule is effective 11/15/99. (64 FR 61786, 11/15/99)
Report from EOIR Liaison Meeting (11/8/99)
Report of the 11/8/99 meeting between AILA and EOIR where the proposed Rules of Professional Responsibility were discussed. AILA raised concerns that the changes provided for harsh penalties for a wide range of conduct and did not apply to trial attorneys. Minutes prepared by Royal F. Berg.
EOIR Liaison Meeting Minutes (11/8/99)
Liaison minutes from the EOIR/AILA liaison meeting that was held on November 8, 1999.
Amicus Brief in Fu v. Reno
Amicus brief filed in Texas by AILF in support of plaintiff's motion for reconsideration in Fu v. Reno, (N.D.Tex.) arguing that the court has jurisdiction over the matter.
BIA on Transition Period Custody Rules
The BIA held that INA 236(c) does not apply to aliens whose most recent release from custody by an authority other than the INS occurred prior to the expiration of the Transition Period Custody Rules. (Matter of Adeniji, 11/3/99)
BIA Says "Actions Taken" Include BIA Appeals
The BIA held that the term "actions taken" in IIRIRA 321(c), which limits the applicability of the aggravated felony definition, includes consideration of a case by the BIA such that the definition is applicable to cases decided by the Board on or after 9/30/96. (Matter of Truong, 10/20/99)