Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
1,251 - 1,275 of 13,006 collection items

CRS Provides Report on U.S. Immigration Courts and the Pending Cases Backlog

CRS provided a report on the U.S. immigration courts and the pending cases backlog. The report outlines EOIR’s adjudicatory components, explains removal proceedings, presents proposed solutions to the backlog, addresses the Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2022, and more.

4/25/22 AILA Doc. No. 22042702. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA and Partners Submit Amicus Brief on the Nonstate Actor Test

AILA and partners submitted a brief urging the court to apply the de novo standard of review to the agency’s legal analysis in regards to the nonstate actor test, grant the petition for review, and remand for the BIA to apply correct standard of review and unable-or-unwilling nonstate actor test.

4/25/22 AILA Doc. No. 22042801. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief

DHS OIG Releases Report on Standard Violations at South Texas ICE Processing Center

DHS OIG inspected the South Texas ICE Processing Center, identifying violations of ICE detention standards that compromised the health, safety, and rights of detainees. DHS OIG made five recommendations; ICE concurred.

4/22/22 AILA Doc. No. 22042803. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

ICE 30-Day Notice and Request for Comments on Proposed Revisions to Form I-333

ICE 30-day notice and request for comments on proposed revisions to Form I-333, Obligor Change of Address. Comments are due 5/23/22. (87 FR 24190, 4/22/22)

4/22/22 AILA Doc. No. 22042200. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Sustains Respondent’s Appeal after Applying Matter of Pickering and Finding Virginia Controlled Substance Statute Divisible

BIA found that if a nunc pro tunc order is based on procedural or substantive defect in underlying proceedings, the original conviction is invalid for immigration purposes and that VA Code is divisible with respect to controlled substance involved. Matter of Dingus, 28 I&N Dec. 529 (BIA 2022)

4/22/22 AILA Doc. No. 22050206. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Finds Louisiana Domestic Abuse Statute Is Not Categorically a Crime of Domestic Violence under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i)

BIA says SCOTUS construction of “physical force” in Johnson and Stokeling controls its interpretation of 18 USC §16(a), which is incorporated by reference into INA, and Louisiana Statutes is overbroad with respect to §16(a). Matter of Dang, 28 I&N Dec. 541 (BIA 2022)

4/22/22 AILA Doc. No. 22050212. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

DHS 5-Day Notice and Request for Comments on New MPP Disenrollment Request System

DHS 5-day notice and request for comments on a new public-facing Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) Disenrollment Request website. Comments are due 4/26/22. (87 FR 23879, 4/21/22)

4/21/22 AILA Doc. No. 22042000. Admissions & Border, Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR to Stop Holding Hearings in Pittsburgh on Sidney Street

EOIR announced it will no longer hold hearings in Pittsburgh, effective at close of business on April 29, 2022. DHS is unable to support hearings there at this time. Pittsburgh-area respondents and representatives can have cases heard remotely or in person at the Philadelphia immigration court.

4/21/22 AILA Doc. No. 22042103. Removal & Relief
Chapter Documents

AILA Colorado Chapter Opposition to the Potential Appointment of Wayne Paugh as an Immigration Judge

The AILA Colorado Chapter sent a letter to DOJ and EOIR expressing its opposition to the potential appointment of Wayne Paugh as an immigration judge.

4/21/22 AILA Doc. No. 23082533. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Denies Rehearing En Banc in Rodriguez v. Garland

The court denied the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc in Rodriguez v. Garland, in which the court held that the BIA erroneously interpreted INA §239(a) in denying petitioner’s motion to reopen and rescind his in absentia removal order. (Rodriguez v. Garland, 4/19/22)

4/19/22 AILA Doc. No. 22050455. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Holds That BIA Failed to Apply Clear-Error Review to IJ’s Factual Finding of Hardship to Petitioner’s Father

The court held that the BIA impermissibly changed the IJ’s factual finding from a finding that hardship “would” occur to the petitioner’s father to a finding that hardship “might” occur without applying clear-error review, and thus granted the petition for review. (Barros v. Garland, 4/19/22)

4/19/22 AILA Doc. No. 22050453. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Rescinds Policy Memoranda 19-05, 21-06, and 21-13

EOIR rescinded PM 19-05, Guidance Regarding the Adjudication of Asylum Applications Consistent with INA § 208(d)(5)(A)(iii); PM 21-06, Asylum Processing; and PM 21-13, Continuances.

4/18/22 AILA Doc. No. 22041901. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Says BIA Did Not Err in Considering Aggregate Risk of Torture as to Salvadoran Petitioner

Upholding the denial of Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief, the court held that the IJ did not improperly conflate risks posed by the police and vigilante groups, and that BIA correctly reviewed the IJ’s finding under the clearly erroneous standard. (Ibarra Chevez v. Garland, 4/15/22)

4/15/22 AILA Doc. No. 22050200. Asylum & Refugees, Crimes, Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Five Tips to Minimize Retraumatizing Your Clients

Every time a client must tell their traumatic experiences, there is a potential for retraumatizing them. Minimize that effect and improve your advocacy through these five essential tips from the popular roundtable The Trauma-Informed Practice & Lawyering Skills.

Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Announces New Appellate Judge

EOIR announced the appointment of Beth Liebmann as a member of BIA by Attorney General Merrick B. Garland. Biographical information for Liebmann has been provided.

4/14/22 AILA Doc. No. 22041405. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

BIA Invites Amicus Briefs on Texas Burglary Statute

The BIA invites amicus curiae briefs discussing Texas Penal Code §30.02(a)(3), the generic offense of burglary, and whether a conviction under Texas Penal Code §30.02(a)(3) is a “crime of violence” under INA §101(a)(43(F) that meets the “physical force” element. Briefs are due May 3, 2022.

4/12/22 AILA Doc. No. 22041838. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA6 Stays District Court's Injunction Against Implementation of DHS's Civil Immigration Enforcement Guidance

On 4/12/22, the Sixth Circuit stayed the implementation of the district court's nationwide injunction that had blocked DHS from implementing Section II of its civil immigration enforcement guidance that was issued in September 2021. (Arizona v. Biden, 4/12/22)

4/12/22 AILA Doc. No. 22041851. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

USCIS Announces Online Filing for DACA Renewal Forms

USCIS announced that individuals who previously received deferred action under DACA may file Form I-821D online. Currently, the option is only available for individuals who have previously been granted DACA. They must file Form I-765 to support their DACA filing, which is also available online.

4/12/22 AILA Doc. No. 22041202. DACA, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Announces Appointment of Mary Cheng as Deputy Director

EOIR announced the appointment of Mary Cheng as the agency’s deputy director. Judge Cheng has served the EOIR since 2009. Additional information on her background has been provided.

4/11/22 AILA Doc. No. 22041204. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Provides Staff Directory for Immigration Courts

EOIR provided a staff directory with phone numbers for immigration court staff, including clerks. The AILA EOIR/ICE Joint Liaison Committee had requested that this information be provided.

4/11/22 AILA Doc. No. 22042500. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Finds Asylum Applicant Failed to Show Honduran Government Was Unable or Unwilling to Control Her Persecutors

The court held that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s finding that the petitioner, who had been abused as a child and threatened by the MS-13 gang, did not show that the Honduran government was unable or unwilling to control her alleged persecutors. (Sanchez-Amador v. Garland, 4/11/22)

4/11/22 AILA Doc. No. 22050202. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Holds That 30-Day Appeal Filing Period of 8 CFR §1003.38(b) Is Non-Jurisdictional and Subject to Equitable Tolling

The court vacated the BIA’s decision dismissing the petitioner’s appeal as untimely and remanded, holding that the 30-day appeal filing deadline imposed by 8 CFR §1003.38(b) is non-jurisdictional and thus subject to equitable tolling. (Boch-Saban v. Garland, 4/8/22)

4/8/22 AILA Doc. No. 22050201. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Liaison Minutes

AILA Liaison Meeting with EOIR (4/7/22)

The AILA EOIR/ICE Joint Liaison Committee provides unofficial notes from its meeting on April 7, 2022, with EOIR. These notes are not official minutes. Topics include ECAS and technology, notice of hearing changes, prosecutorial discretion, and withdrawing from administratively closed cases.

4/7/22 AILA Doc. No. 22031804. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Liaison Minutes

AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE (4/7/22)

The AILA EOIR/ICE Joint Liaison Committee provides minutes from its meeting with representatives of ICE’s Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) and Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) on April 7, 2022.

4/7/22 AILA Doc. No. 22032504. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA6 Finds Petitioner Was Not Denied a Chance to Seek Review of Court’s Panel Opinion

Where the court had granted petitioner 14 extensions in which to file a petition for rehearing en banc, the court denied his motion to vacate the panel decision, finding that his failure to seek review of the decision was a matter of choice, not chance. (Hernandez-Serrano v. Garland, 4/7/22)

4/7/22 AILA Doc. No. 22050203. Removal & Relief