Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
BIA Vacates Denial of Continuance for U Visa Applicant
Unpublished BIA decision holds that IJ erred in denying continuance to await adjudication of U visa application solely because it was not a form of relief that could be granted by the court. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of De La Cruz, 3/25/19)
CA8 Says “Salvadoran Female Heads of Households” Is Not a Cognizable Particular Social Group
The court held that the BIA did not err in ruling that petitioner had failed to prove past persecution on account of her membership in the social group of “Salvadoran female heads of household,” finding that the group lacked social distinction and particularity. (De Guevara v. Barr, 3/21/19)
Read All About It: ABA Report Calls for Independent Immigration Courts
Jeremy McKinney describes what he is seeing in his practice which underscores the need for an independent immigration court, a call echoed by the American Bar Association's new report on the immigration system released March 20, 2019.
CA9 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Mexican Police Officer Who Received Death Threats from Hitmen
The court held that the evidence did not compel the conclusion that the petitioner, a Mexican police officer who had received two death threats from hitmen of the Sinaloa drug cartel, had suffered past harm rising to the level of persecution. (Duran-Rodriguez v. Barr, 3/20/19)
CA4 Reverses Denial of CAT Relief to Salvadoran Who Received Death Threats from Gang
The court granted the petition for review, holding that the BIA had entirely failed to address the petitioner’s testimony that Salvadoran officials had turned a “blind eye” to death threats made by members of the 18th Street gang to petitioner and her son. (Cabrera Vasquez v. Barr, 3/20/19)
EOIR Releases Updated Guidance on Use of Electronic Devices in EOIR Space
EOIR released PM 19-10 providing EOIR’s security directive and policy for public use of electronic devices in EOIR space. This directive replaces the previous EOIR Security Directive on this topic and is effective as of 3/20/19.
DHS CRCL Issues Memo Describing Complaints and Allegations Regarding Inadequate Medical and Mental Health Care Provided by ICE
BuzzFeed News obtained a DHS CRCL memo to ICE, issued after DHS CRCL received information from DHS OIG alleging that ICE Health Services Corps systematically provided inadequate mental and mental health care and oversight to immigration detainees.
Documents Related to Case Challenging Mandatory Detention Under INA §236(c) for Individuals Not Apprehended Promptly When Released from Criminal Custo
Documents related to Nielsen v. Preap, a case challenging mandatory detention under INA §236(c) for individuals not apprehended promptly when released from criminal custody.
BIA Finds Assault Against Cohabitant Under Cal. Penal Code 273.5(a) Is Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds that assault against cohabitant under Cal. Penal Code 273.5(a) is not a CIMT. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ramirez-Cortez, 3/19/19)
BIA Finds Respondent Established Wave-Through Admission Under Matter of Quilantan
Unpublished BIA decision finds respondent established a wave-through admission under Matter of Quilantan in light of corroborating testimony from witness who saw immigration officers check his paperwork. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Valdez Palacio, 3/19/19)
EOIR Swears in 31 New Immigration Judges
EOIR announced the investiture of 31 new immigration judges. Then-acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker appointed the judges to their new positions. Notice includes biographical information.
CA4 Says BIA Applied Wrong Standard of Review in Evaluating Physical Custody Requirement Under the CCA
The court granted the petition for review and remanded, holding that whether a foreign-born child was in the “physical custody” of his or her U.S. citizen parent for purposes of the Child Citizenship Act of 2000 (CCA) is a mixed question of fact and law. (Duncan v. Barr, 3/19/19)
SCOTUS Upholds Government Authority to Detain and Deport Immigrants for Past Crimes
The Supreme Court held that the mandatory detention statute, which plainly provides for detention without any hearing “when” an immigrant “is released” from a prior criminal custody, applies even when the arrest occurs years after their release. (Nielsen v. Preap, 3/19/19)
TRAC Finds Newly Arriving Families Not Main Reason for Immigration Court’s Growing Backlog
TRAC released a report on newly arriving family cases from the southwest border, and how their numbers compare with the flow of incoming new cases and the court's growing backlog, finding that recent family arrivals represent just four percent of the current court’s 855,807 case backlog.
CA7 Upholds Denial of CAT Relief Where Salvadoran’s Allegations of Future Torture Were Deemed Too Speculative
The court upheld the denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), finding that petitioner had failed to prove that he would be specifically targeted by gangs or the military in El Salvador or that the government would acquiesce in any torture. (Herrera-Garcia v. Barr, 3/18/19)
CA9 Orders En Banc Rehearing of Martinez-Cedillo v. Barr
The court ordered that Martinez-Cedillo v. Barr, in which a three-judge panel found that the BIA’s interpretation of a crime of child abuse, neglect, or abandonment was entitled to Chevron deference, be reheard en banc. (Martinez-Cedillo v. Barr, 3/18/19)
BIA Finds Attorney Provided Ineffective Assistance by Sending Medical Examination to USCIS
Unpublished BIA decision finds ineffective assistance clear and obvious where the attorney mistakenly sent the respondent’s medical examination to USCIS rather than the immigration court. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Corena-Vela, 3/18/19)
CA1 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Kenyan Petitioner Who Alleged Changed Country Conditions
The court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding that country conditions in Kenya—climbing land prices, anti-LGBT discrimination, and al-Shabaab violence—were continuing, not changed, since the petitioner’s removal proceedings in 2013. (Wanjiku v. Barr, 3/15/19)
Friday FAM on Departure Bonds
This edition of the Friday FAM covers departure bonds.
ICE HSI Provides “By the Numbers” 2018 Fact Sheets
ICE Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) provides a 2018 fact sheets with FY2018 numbers and summaries of its work.
AILA Insight: Welcoming the Stranger at Our Border: My Experience Observing and Volunteering in Tijuana, Mexico
AILA member Julia Marquez shares her experience volunteering with Al Otro Lado at the U.S.-Mexico border in Tijuana, Mexico.
CA6 Upholds Asylum Denial to Salvadoran Who Claimed Persecution Based on Nuclear Family Unit Membership
The court denied the petition for review, finding that petitioner’s evidence did not show that the 18th Street gang’s actions were motivated by a particular animus toward petitioner’s family itself, as opposed to an ordinary criminal desire for financial gain. (Cruz-Guzman v. Barr, 3/15/19)
BIA Reopens Proceedings Sua Sponte for Haitian TPS Holder to Adjust Status
Unpublished BIA decision reopens proceedings sua sponte for respondent to apply for adjustment of status based on an approved visa petition in light of grant of TPS, entry under grant of advance parole, and country conditions in Haiti. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Dorilus, 3/14/19)
AILA and Other Organizations Submit Amicus Brief on Family as a Particular Social Group
AILA, along with several other organizations and law clinics, submitted an amicus brief to the Attorney General in Matter of L-E-A, arguing that family ties alone can form a particular social group.
CA1 Rejects Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim Where Petitioner Filed Motion to Reopen Seven Years After BIA Denied His Appeal
The court upheld the BIA's decision denying the petitioner's motion to reopen and declining to equitably toll the 90-day filing deadline, finding that even if the petitioner had received ineffective assistance of counsel, he failed to exercise due diligence. (Tay-Chan v. Barr, 3/13/19)