Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
Fearless Litigation: Psychological Evaluations - How They Help Your Case and How to Obtain Them (February 2018)
Zachary Nightingale talks with Holly Cooper, Katie Shepherd, and Dr. Alan Shapiro about the importance of the procurement and use of mental health status evaluations in immigration court, especially for detained clients.
District Court Judge Orders Bond or Joseph Hearings for Individuals in Withholding-Only Proceedings in Virginia
A federal district court judge in Virginia issued an opinion and order certifying a class of petitioners and directing the government to provide bond or Joseph hearings to individuals detained in withholding-only proceedings in Virginia. (Cabrera Diaz v. Hott, 2/26/18)
California District Court Enjoins Termination of an Individual’s DACA Status Without Notice
A federal district court in California issued an order preliminarily enjoining the government from terminating an individual’s DACA status without notice, a reasoned explanation, and an opportunity to be heard. (Inland Empire – Immigrant Youth Collective v. Nielsen, 2/26/18)
IJ Finds Respondent Established Persecution on Perceived LGBTI Identity
In an unpublished decision, the IJ granted the respondent’s application for asylum, finding he established that he suffered persecution on account of his perceived LGBTI identity and the Guatemalan government is unable to control his persecutors. Courtesy of Brian Blackford.
OPLA to Open Office in Louisville, Kentucky
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) announced it will open an office in Louisville, Kentucky. This office will be under the responsibility of the Chicago Chief Counsel. The physical office will not open until late May or early June 2018, correspondence can be received beginning 4/2/18.
EOIR To Open Immigration Court in Louisville, Kentucky
EOIR announced that it will open an immigration court in Louisville, Kentucky, on April 2, 2018. Notice includes contact information and hours of operation.
BIA Finds Misprision of Felony Is a CIMT
The BIA dismissed the appeal, finding that misprision of felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4 (2006) is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT) and reaffirmed the holding in Matter of Robles. Matter of Mendez, 27 I&N Dec. 219 (BIA 2018)
CA2 Holds That BIA’s Interpretation of REAL ID Act Was Entitled to Chevron Deference
The court held that the BIA’s interpretation of the REAL ID Act as not requiring an IJ to give a petitioner an opportunity to submit additional evidence when the IJ concludes that corroborating evidence is required was entitled to Chevron deference. (Sun v. Sessions, 2/23/18)
USCIS Provides Information and FAQs on the DACA January 2018 Preliminary Injunction
USCIS provides guidance and FAQs on the preliminary injunctions issued by district courts on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. USCIS is not accepting new requests but is accepting renewal requests and operated on the terms in place before the program was rescinded on 9/5/17.
HHS Notice of Intent to Fund 450 Additional Beds to Keep Unaccompanied Children in Custody
HHS (Department of Health and Human Services) notice of intent to provide $15,000,000 of funding for 450 beds to keep unaccompanied children in custody. (83 FR 7726, 2/22/18)
BIA Holds California Child Abuse Statute Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds that child abuse under Cal. Penal Code 273a(a) is not a CIMT because it only requires a mens rea of negligence and can be violated by conduct that is believed in good faith to be in the child’s best interest. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Torres, 2/22/18)
BIA Rejects DHS Request to Overrule Matter of Cota
Unpublished BIA decision rejects DHS request that it overrule Matter of Cota, 23 I&N Dec. 849 (BIA 2005), over dissent of Member Garry Malphrus. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Madrigal, 2/22/18)
DHS OIG Finds ICE Did Not Follow Federal Procurement Guidelines When Contracting for Detention Services
DHS OIG found that In September 2014, ICE improperly modified an existing service agreement with the City of Eloy in Arizona to establish the 2,400-bed South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, Texas, more than 900 miles away. ICE believes that its modification were proper.
Congressional Report: Economic Impact of DACA – Spotlight on Small Business
On 2/21/18, the Democrats of the Committee on Small Business Committee published a report on the economic impact of DACA. The report demonstrates the important role that DACA recipients play in macroeconomic contributions, tax contributions, consumer spending power, and entrepreneurship.
BIA Finds IJ Properly Considered Applicant’s Border Interview in Making Credibility Determination
The BIA dismissed the appeal, stating that when considering a border or airport interview in making a credibility determination, an IJ should assess the accuracy and reliability of the interview based on the totality of the circumstances. Matter of J-C-H-F-, 27 I&N Dec. 211 (BIA 2018)
CA11 Holds That Petitioner’s Florida Drug Trafficking Conviction Was Categorically Not an Aggravated Felony
The court held that Florida Statutes §893.135(1)(c)1. (2007), which criminalized various narcotics offenses, was indivisible and categorically overbroad, and therefore a conviction under that statute cannot qualify as an aggravated felony under the INA. (Cintron v. Attorney General, 2/20/18)
American Immigration Council Submits Amicus Brief on Administrative Closure
The American Immigration Council, with other immigrant rights organizations, submitted an amicus brief in the Matter of Castro-Tum. In this case, Attorney General Sessions referred to himself questions related to administrative closure.
ICE Announces LA Operation Resulting in 212 Arrests and 122 NOIs
ICE announced that deportation officers and special agents arrested 212 individuals for violating federal immigration laws and served 122 notices of inspection (NOIs) to businesses in the Los Angeles “area of responsibility” during a five-day targeted operation.
Senate Bipartisan Efforts to Save Dreamers Destroyed by Veto Threat
AILA expressed deep disappointment in the failure of the Senate to pass commonsense reforms to protect Dreamers. At the same time, AILA commends the many senators who stood firm against the nativist voices demanding legislation to gut legal immigration and make our country weaker.
AILA Submits Amicus Brief on Administrative Closure Authority
AILA filed an amicus brief with other organizations in Matter of Castro-Tum, which the Attorney General had referred to himself for review. The brief argues that immigration judges have the authority to administratively close a case and that continuances are not an adequate substitute.
Resources To Prepare for Raids and Other Immigration Enforcement Actions
AILA, along with NGO partners, compiled a one-pager on how to prepare for immigration raids. Resources include links to Know Your Rights handouts, toolkits, how to find a detainee, information on filing a complaint, reporting enforcement actions to advocacy organizations, and more.
BIA Declines to Consider Interlocutory DHS Appeal Challenging Three-Month Continuance
Unpublished BIA decision declines to consider interlocutory DHS appeal of decision continuing proceedings from November 2017 to February 2018. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Concha, 2/16/18)
BIA Rescinds In Absentia Order for Respondent Whose Car Broke Down En Route to Hearing
Unpublished BIA decision rescinds in absentia order under totality of the circumstances against respondent who had appeared at 15 prior hearings and whose car broke down en route to his final hearing. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Gudiel, 2/16/18)
CA1 Finds BIA Did Not Abuse Its Discretion in “Particularly Serious Crime” Analysis
The court denied the petitions for review, finding that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the petitioner’s aggravated identity theft conviction was a “particularly serious crime” rendering her ineligible for withholding. (Valerio-Ramirez v. Sessions, 2/15/18)
BIA Rescinds In Absentia Order Because Hearing Notice Omitted “In Care Of”
Unpublished BIA decision rescinds in absentia order because address on hearing notice did not include “in care of” notation listed on respondent’s change of address form. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Mejia-Flores, 2/15/18)