Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
ICE Policy Memo on Identifying and Monitoring Pregnant Detainees
ICE policy memo entitled “Identification and Monitoring of Pregnant Detainees” consolidating existing guidance and setting forth additional procedures to ensure that pregnant women detained in ICE custody are identified, monitored, and housed in the most appropriate facility to manage their care.
As Detained Mothers Continue Hunger Strike, AILA Urges Administration to End Family Detention
Twenty-two mothers being held with their children for months in the Berks family detention center began a hunger strike this week; AILA President William A. Stock urged an end to family detention, noting, “These brave mothers are putting their health at risk to draw attention to injustice.”
TRAC Report Questions Linkage Between Law Enforcement Cooperation and ICE’s Apprehension Numbers
This TRAC report, based upon a review of individual detainer records, calls into question the assumed linkage between cooperation with ICE by state and local law enforcement agencies and ICE’s success in apprehending immigrants it seeks to deport.
CA7 Upholds CAT Denial to Seventh Day Adventist Citizen of Mexico
The court held that petitioner, a practicing Seventh Day Adventist who claimed he would be persecuted and forced to work for the Zetas gang if removed to Mexico, did not establish a clear probability that he would face persecution or torture upon his removal. (Lozano-Zuniga v. Lynch, 8/12/16)
CA7 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Chinese Petitioner Based on Adverse Credibility Finding
The held that substantial evidence supported the IJ’s conclusions that petitioner, a 52-year-old Chinese citizen who claimed that he feared forced sterilization under China’s one-child policy, was not credible, and that he did not adequately corroborate his account. (Yang v. Lynch, 8/12/16)
ICE Director Saldaña Response to Sign-On Letter on Immigration Raids
On 8/12/16, ICE Director Sarah Saldaña responded to a June 2016 sign-on letter to DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson and Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the aggressive tactics against Central Americans.
AILA Indiana Chapter Files Amicus Brief in Case Involving Undocumented Worker’s Injury
AILA’s Indiana Chapter submitted an amicus brief with the Supreme Court of Indiana, arguing that the Court of Appeals’ opinion creates an unworkable evidentiary standard based on a misunderstanding of immigration law. Courtesy of Thomas Ruge. (Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Company, Inc., 8/12/16)
OIG Report: Review of the Federal Bureau of Prisons’ Monitoring of Contract Prisons
DHS Office of Inspector General released a report finding that, in most key areas, contract prisons incurred more safety and security incidents per capita than comparable Bureau of Prisons’ institutions, and that the agency needs to improve how it monitors contract prisons in several areas.
CA1 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Christian Chinese Petitioner
The court held that the BIA’s decision to affirm the IJ’s denial of asylum to petitioner, who argued that she had a well-founded fear of future persecution due to her prior attendance at an underground Christian church in China, was supported by substantial evidence. (Qin v. Lynch, 8/10/16)
CA1 Says Salvadoran Women with Partners Who View Them as Property Is Not a Particular Social Group
The court held that the petitioner, whose proposed social group was defined as “Salvadoran women in intimate relationships with partners who view them as property,” failed to show that her PSG shared immutable characteristics and had social distinction. (Vega-Ayala v. Lynch, 8/10/16)
BIA Rescinds In Absentia Order In of Evidence of Vehicle Malfunction
Unpublished BIA decision rescinds in absentia order of removal in light of evidence submitted on appeal reflecting mechanical work on the vehicle that malfunctioned on the day of the respondent’s hearing. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Lopez, 8/10/16)
TRAC Report Finds Reforms of ICE Detainer Program Largely Ignored by Field Officers
A TRAC report found that half of the detainers issued by ICE during the first two months of FY2016 targeted individuals who have no criminal record, which is up slightly from before DHS Secretary Johnson's 11/20/14 announcement of the Priority Enforcement Program.
BIA Rescinds In Absentia Order Against Respondent Advised to Rest By Doctor
Unpublished BIA decision rescinds in absentia in absentia order of removal in light of evidence that respondent saw a doctor on the day of his hearing and was advised to rest and given a prescription. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Solis, 8/8/16)
BIA Holds Possession of Virtual Child Pornography Not an Aggravated Felony
Unpublished BIA decision holds that 18 USC 2252A is not an aggravated felony under INA 101(a)(43)(I) because it encompasses possession of child pornography involving virtual rather than actual minors. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Franco-Lara, 8/4/16)
BIA Finds Interpreter’s Mistranslation Formed Basis of IJ’s Denial of Bond to Respondent
Unpublished BIA decision overturns IJ’s denial of respondent’s request for release on bond, finding that the IJ’s determination that respondent was a danger to the community was based on a mistranslation by the interpreter at his bond hearing. Courtesy of Nicolas Chavez. (Matter of –, 8/4/16)
CA9 Says INA §236(c) Applies Only if ICE Detains Noncitizen Promptly After Release from Criminal Custody
The court held that, under the plain language of INA §236(c), the government may detain without a bond hearing only those noncitizens with criminal convictions it takes into immigration custody “promptly” upon their release from the triggering criminal custody. (Preap v. Johnson, 8/4/16)
H.R. 5851: Refugee Protection Act of 2016
On July 14, 2016, Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) introduced the Refugee Protection Act of 2016, which includes provisions to address many of the severe, longstanding problems in the U.S. refugee and asylum systems.
BIA Remands In Light of Translation Error Involving Spanish Expression
Unpublished BIA decision orders further consideration of case where the interpreter erroneously translated the Spanish expression “se me hizo facil” as “that it seemed easy” rather than “I didn’t really think about the consequences.” Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Hernandez, 8/4/16)
S.3241: Refugee Protection Act of 2016
On July 14, 2016, Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Al Franken (D-MN) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) introduced the Refugee Protection Act of 2016, which includes provisions to address many of the severe, longstanding problems in the U.S. refugee and asylum systems.
DHS Announces Expansion of Initiatives to Address Central American Migration Challenges
DHS announces new initiatives to aid Central American refugees including a protection transfer arrangement with UNHCR and Internal Organization for Migration (IOM), an in-country refugee referral program, and expansion of the existing Central American Minors program.
DOS Announces Expansion of Initiatives to Address Central American Migration Challenges
DOS announces new initiatives to aid Central American refugees including a protection transfer arrangement with UNHCR and Internal Organization for Migration (IOM), an in-country refugee referral program, and expansion of the existing Central American Minors program.
BIA Upholds IJ’s Denial of Bond to Syrian Citizen Pursuant to INA §236(a)
The BIA held that, in determining whether a noncitizen presents a danger to the community at large and thus should not be released on bond pending removal proceedings, an IJ should consider both direct and circumstantial evidence of dangerousness. Matter of Fatahi, 26 I&N Dec. 791 (BIA)
AILA FAQs on Supreme Court’s Ruling in U.S. v. Texas
AILA’s FAQs (updated on 8/3/16) on the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Texas provide an explanation of the Court’s ruling, the impact it will have on millions of immigrant families waiting to apply for DAPA and DACA+, and predictions of what will happen next in the legal case.
Barriers to Protection: The Treatment of Asylum Seekers in Expedited Removal
On 8/2/16, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom released a new report, which found serious flaws in the treatment of asylum seekers, and highlighted the harmful impact that detention has on asylum seekers, especially children.
EOIR Swears in 5 Immigration Judges
EOIR announced the investiture of five immigration judges (IJs). Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed judges for courts in Texas, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey.