Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
Vaccine Overdose of Detained Children Another Sign that Family Detention Must End
On July 4, 2015, AILA and AIC learned that, recently, medical personnel at the detention center in Dilley, Texas that holds nearly 2,000 children and their mothers mistakenly gave adult-strength Hepatitis A vaccinations to approximately 250 children.
BIA Reverses Denial of Continuance to Seek SIJ Status
Unpublished BIA decision holds that IJ should have granted a continuance to file a dependency petition necessary to seek SIJ status. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of A-G-M-, 7/2/15)
BIA Criticizes IJ For Refusing to Allow Telephonic Testimony
Unpublished BIA decision criticizes IJ for refusing to allow foreign doctor to testify telephonically regarding injuries that prevented LPR from returning to the United States more quickly. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Wahid, 7/1/15)
CA10 Says INA §242B(2) Is a Non-Jurisdictional Venue Provision
The court transferred the petition back to the 5th Circuit, finding that INA §242B(2) is not a jurisdictional statute, that venue was proper in the 5th Circuit, and that the interests of justice would best be served if the 5th Circuit adjudicated the petition. (Lee v. Lynch, 7/1/15)
DOJ OIL July 2015 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for July 2015, with articles on Morales-Santana v. Lynch, Morales v. Chadbourne, and DACA, as well as summaries of circuit court decisions for July 2015.
June AIM: Studying Immigration
John Tirman, Executive Director and a Principal Research Scientist at MIT's Center for International Studies, shares his research on immigration and family detention in June's Interview of the Month.
Immigration Law Advisor, June 2015 (Vol. 9, No. 6)
Immigration Law Advisor, a legal publication from EOIR, with an article on looking back and looking forward on gang-related asylum claims, as well as summaries of circuit court decisions for May 2015, summaries of recent BIA precedent decisions and a regulatory update.
Traumatizing Impact of Family Detention on Mental Health of Children and Mothers
The psychological harm caused when mothers and children seeking asylum in the U.S. are detained in jail-like facilities is the subject of a complaint filed with CRCL by AILA, the Women’s Refugee Commission, and the American Immigration Council.
Complaint Highlights Serious Mental Health Impact of Family Detention
AILA, the Women’s Refugee Commission, and the American Immigration Council filed a complaint today with DHS’s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL) on the psychological harm caused when mothers and children seeking asylum are detained in jail-like facilities.
BIA Reopens Proceedings Sua Sponte Because Attorney Failed to File Adjustment Application
Unpublished BIA decision reopens proceedings sua sponte where prior attorney conceded error in failing to timely file adjustment application. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Dominguez-Vitela, 6/30/15)
BIA Administratively Closes Proceedings Pending Direct Appeal of Criminal Conviction
Unpublished BIA decision administratively closes proceedings pending outcome of respondent’s direct appeal of criminal conviction forming sole basis for removability. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Peralta, 6/29/15)
CA1 Says Padilla Does Not Make Removal Punitive
The court held that Padilla’s description of deportation as "an integral part…of the penalty that may be imposed on noncitizen defendants who plead guilty to specified crimes" does not implicate the 8th Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. (Hinds v. Lynch, 6/24/15)
CA7 Finds Defendant May Withdraw Guilty Plea upon Belated Discovery of Deportation Threat
The court held that a defendant, upon belated discovery of a deportation threat about which his counsel failed to warn him, may choose to withdraw a guilty plea and instead seek a trial. (DeBartolo v. United States, 6/26/15)
Supreme Court Holds Imposing Increased Sentence Under ACCA Violates Due Process
The Supreme Court held that imposing an increased sentence under the Armed Criminal Career Act (ACCA) violates due process, because the ACCA’s residual clause defining "violent felony" is unconstitutionally void for vagueness. (Johnson v. United States, 6/26/15)
A Guide to Children Arriving at the Border: Laws, Policies and Responses
The American Immigration Council updated its guide on unaccompanied children, which was first issued in summer 2014. It provides information about the tens of thousands of children who have fled their homes in Central America and arrived at the southern border.
AILA Files Amicus Brief with BIA Arguing Oregon Menacing Statute Not CIMT
On 6/25/15, the AILA Amicus Committee filed an amicus brief with the BIA. The brief argues that apprehension-only simple assaults like those proscribed under Oregon’s menacing statute, requiring no physical contact of any kind, do not categorically constitute crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMT).
BIA Upholds Suspension of Attorney Who Engaged in Conduct Prejudicial to Administration of Justice
The BIA held that an attorney who enlisted his legal assistant to impersonate him during multiple telephonic appearances before immigration judges was properly suspended from practice for 16 months and from telephonic appearances for 7 years. Matter of P. Singh, 26 I&N Dec. 623 (BIA 2015)
Public Version of Complaint to CRCL
Public version of CRCL Complaint with ten individual case summaries documenting in detail the traumatic psycho-social impact of detention on mothers and children seeking asylum.
BIA Reopens Proceedings for Respondent to Seek Provisional Waiver
Unpublished BIA decision reopens and remands proceedings for consideration of respondent's request for administrative closure to apply for an I-601A provisional waiver of unlawful presence. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Barrientos-Vivas, 6/25/15)
BIA Reopens Proceedings Sua Sponte After Respondent's Spouse Was Granted U Status
Unpublished BIA decision reopens proceedings sua sponte in light of the respondent's eligibility to adjust status under INA §245(m)(3) after his spouse was granted U nonimmigrant status. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Meraz, 6/25/15)
BIA Upholds Administrative Closure to Seek Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver
Unpublished BIA decision denies DHS's interlocutory appeal challenging the administrative closure of respondent's removal proceedings to allow the respondent to seek an I-601A provisional waiver of unlawful presence. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Govea, 6/24/15)
Statement by DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson on Family Detention
Statement by DHS Secretary Johnson, “… we must make substantial changes in our detention practices... In short, once a family has established eligibility for asylum or other relief under our laws, long-term detention is an inefficient use of our resources and should be discontinued.”
AILA Quicktake #129: Sec. Johnson Announcement on Family Detention
AILA President Victor Nieblas Pradis reacts to Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson's announcement on ICE's changes to family detention.
AILA: DHS Plans on Family Detention Are a Step Forward
AILA President Victor Nieblas Pradis welcomed newly announced DHS plans relating to family detention but said, “more is needed…Asylum seeking families should be given due process, not expedited removal. And the end of the road must be the end of family detention entirely.”
CA9 Says Regulatory Departure Bar Invalid Regardless of How Noncitizen Departed U.S.
The court held that the regulatory departure bar is invalid irrespective of how the noncitizen departed the U.S., and that the IIRIRA’s text makes clear the statutory right to file a motion to reopen or reconsider is not limited by whether the individual had departed. (Toor v. Lynch, 6/17/15)