Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
Practice Tips on How to Prepare Noncitizens for Possible Detention
AILA’s ICE National Committee provides the following suggestions for how to help noncitizens create a plan of action, in the event of a possible detention.
CA4 Holds That Salvadoran Asylum Seeker Failed to Meet “Unable or Unwilling” Government Control Requirement
Upholding the BIA’s denial of the petitioner’s motion to reconsider his asylum application, the court held that circuit precedent requires an applicant to show the home government’s inability or unwillingness to control a non-state persecutor. (Molina-Diaz v. Bondi, 2/19/25)
ICE Issues Guidance on Use of Body Worn Cameras
On 2/19/25, ICE Acting Director Caleb Vitello issued a policy directive (ICE Directive 19010.3) to establish policy for the use of Body Worn Cameras (BWCs) by ICE Law Enforcement Officers and Agents (LEOs).
DHS Provides Fact Sheet on Immigration Services Program
DHS provided a fact sheet on the Science and Technology Directorate’s Immigration Services Program, which will support DHS in matters related to immigration custody, case processing, and removal operations, as well as seek to prevent immigration fraud, improve data management, and more.
ICE Issues Guidance on Stays of Removal and Private Immigration Bills
ICE Acting Director Caleb Vitello issued a policy directive (ICE Directive 5004.3) with guidance on stays of removal and private immigration bills. The guidance is effective immediately and remains in effect until superseded.
DHS Announces Ad Campaign Encouraging Self-Deportation and Discouraging Undocumented Migration
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem announced a domestic and international multimillion-dollar advertising campaign encouraging self-deportation and discouraging potential undocumented immigrants from coming to the United States.
CA8 Upholds Asylum Denial Where Algerian Petitioners’ Son with Disability Was Denied Medical Care
The court held that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s conclusion that the lack of medical treatment received by petitioners’ son with spina bifida arose from motives unrelated to persecution by the Algerian government, and thus upheld the denial of asylum. (Ferchichi v. Bondi, 2/14/25)
Expedited Removal: Key Updates, Who Is Impacted, and How to Fight Back
This resource will provide updates and guidance on the new expansion of expedited removal.
EOIR Rescinds Memo on Revised Case Flow Processing Before the Immigration Courts
EOIR Acting Director Sirce Owen issued Policy Memorandum (PM) 25-21 rescinding and canceling the 12/16/21 Director’s Memorandum (DM) 22-04, which set a default filing deadline in non-detained cases of 15 days before individual calendar hearings.
Practice Alert: New EOIR Policy Memoranda
Since January 20, 2025, EOIR has released various Policy Memoranda (PM). A list of the memoranda is published on the EOIR website. This practice alert is meant to give practitioners a sense of the content of each memo as well as the relevant link for further reading.
CA9 Holds That Petitioner’s Conviction for First-Degree Criminal Mistreatment in Oregon Was a CIMT
The court held that the petitioner’s conviction for first-degree criminal mistreatment in Oregon was a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT), and that the petitioner was ineligible for cancellation of removal under INA §240A(a). (Murillo-Chavez v. Bondi, 2/13/25)
CA5 Finds It Lacked Jurisdiction to Review BIA’s Continuance Determination as to Cameroonian Petitioner
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s denial of the petitioner’s motion to continue his removal proceedings based on his daughter’s then-pending I-130 petition, and upheld the BIA’s denial of his motion to remand. (Ikome v. Bondi, 2/12/25)
CA9 Holds That BIA Erred in Finding Romanian Petitioners’ Harm Did Not Cumulatively Rise to Level of Past Persecution
The court found that the record compelled the conclusion that the petitioners’ past experiences collectively rose to the level of persecution, and that the BIA erred when it determined that the Roma ethnicity is not a disfavored group in Romania. (Lapadat v. Bondi, 2/12/25)
AILA Urges Members of Congress to Reject Agent Raul Gonzalez Officer Safety Act (H.R. 35)
AILA urges members of Congress to reject HR 35, and instead to enact solutions that ensure a more orderly, effective and fair immigration system.
CA1 Upholds Asylum Denial After Finding Petitioner’s Ex-Partner Was Motivated to Harm Her Based on Personal Issues
The court upheld the BIA’s conclusion that petitioner, whose particular social group (PSG) consisted of “Brazilian women who are victims of domestic violence,” did not show the requisite nexus between her proffered social group and any past or future harm. (Sanches Alves v. Bondi, 2/12/25)
District Court Approves Class Action Settlement Agreement in Ms. L. v. ICE
The district court approved a class action settlement agreement in a lawsuit relating to families who were apprehended together by the U.S. government at the U.S.-Mexico border between 1/20/17 and 1/20/21, but were then separated and kept apart. (Ms. L., et al. v. ICE, et al., 12/1/23)
CA1 Finds BIA Did Not Depart from Its Settled Course of Adjudication in Denying Sua Sponte Reopening
The court rejected petitioner’s argument that BIA, in denying his motion to reopen, departed from its settled practice of granting sua sponte reopening whenever a conviction rendering a noncitizen removable is vacated due to a defect in the criminal proceedings. (Phimmady v. Bondi, 2/10/25)
CA9 Declines Government’s Request to Amend Case Caption Based on Rule 15(a)(2)(A)
The court held that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 15(a)(2)(A)’s naming requirement is satisfied when a petitioner’s “A” number from the agency proceeding below appears in the caption or body of a petition for review. (Perez-Perez v. Bondi, 2/10/25)
Practice Alert: Changes to Virtual Service in Recent EOIR Policy Manual Updates
EOIR issued changes to the immigration court practice manual that have significant implications on service of OPLA.
EOIR Rescinds Memo on Language Access in Immigration Court
EOIR Acting Director Sirce Owen issued Policy Memorandum (PM) 25-20 rescinding and canceling the 6/6/23 Director’s Memorandum (DM) 23-02, which provided guidance to IJs regarding language access issues in immigration court proceedings.
CA8 Upholds Denial of Asylum Where Petitioners’ Persecutor Was Later Murdered
The court upheld the BIA’s denial of asylum as to the mother and daughter petitioners from Mexico, where the mother had experienced while pregnant a physical assault by her cousin, who was later murdered, but no harm had come to her daughter in utero. (Becerril-Sanchez v. Bondi, 2/6/25)
DOJ Issues Memo on Policy Regarding Charging, Plea Negotiations, and Sentencing
The Attorney General issued a memo outlining DOJ's general policy on charging decisions, plea bargaining, sentencing, and investigative and charging priorities, including immigration enforcement priorities.
DOJ Issues Memo on Sanctuary Jurisdiction Directives
Attorney General Pamela Bondi issued a memo on sanctuary jurisdiction directives, stating that sanctuary jurisdictions should not receive access to federal grants administered by the DOJ, among other things.
EOIR Issues Memo on Re-Establishing a Robust Anti-Fraud Program
EOIR Acting Director Sirce Owen issued Policy Memorandum (PM) 25-19 stating that EOIR is committed to re-establishing a robust and effective Anti-Fraud Program that will provide resources to employees on how to identify and report suspected fraud, coordinate with investigative authorities, and more.
CA4 Holds That BIA Failed to Consider Relevant Evidence in Finding Petitioner Could Relocate in Honduras
The court held that the BIA ignored legally relevant evidence when it reversed the IJ’s decision granting deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) after determining that petitioner had failed to prove he could relocate safely in Honduras. (Funez-Ortiz v. McHenry, 2/4/25)