Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
BIA Finds Attorney Provided Ineffective Assistance by Missending Medical Examination
Unpublished BIA decision finds prior attorney provided ineffective assistance by mistakenly submitting medical examination to USCIS rather than immigration court. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Samuels-Foster, 7/30/20)
Attorney General Rules on Categorical Approach to Determining Aggravated Felonies
Ruling on the application of the categorical approach to determining aggravated felonies and that respondent’s conviction for grand larceny in the second degree in NY was an aggravated felony, the AG vacated BIA’s decision in Matter of Reyes. Matter of Reyes, 28 I&N Dec. 52 (A.G. 2020)
CBP Provides Summary of Medical Implementation Plan
CBP provided a summary of its plans for UFO and USBP to enhance their medical support efforts for individuals in CBP custody and to implement the Enhanced Medical Directive issued by CBP in December 2019. The Implementation Plans include a Concept of Operations and Standard Operating Procedures.
CA6 Says BIA Erred in Denying Iraqi Petitioner’s Motion to Remand to Consider New Evidence
The court held that the BIA erred in denying the Iraqi petitioner’s motion to remand, finding that his new evidence, particularly two 2017 DOS reports on human rights and religious freedom in Iraq, could be significant to his Convention Against Torture (CAT) claim. (Marqus v. Barr, 7/30/20)
CA3 Holds IJ Failed to Reconsider Discretionary Denial of Asylum After Sri Lankan Petitioner Was Granted Withholding
Granting the petition for review, the court held that the IJ abused his discretion by failing to reconsider pursuant to 8 CFR §1208.16(e) his discretionary denial of asylum to the Sri Lankan petitioner, who was subsequently granted withholding of removal. (Sathanthrasa v. Att’y Gen., 7/30/20)
Fearless Lawyering Video Roundtables
Hosted by the Immigration Justice Campaign, these roundtables featured discussions about litigation skills for immigration attorneys. Watch the recordings.
CA9 Holds That a Conviction for Criminal Stalking in California Is Categorically a CIMT
Denying the petition for review, the court held that the BIA did not err in concluding that the petitioner’s conviction under California Penal Code §646.9(a) for criminal stalking was categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). (Orellana v. Barr, 7/28/20)
CA2 Finds Chinese Asylum Seeker Failed to Sufficiently Explain Inconsistencies in His Testimony
The court upheld the BIA’s asylum denial, finding that petitioner, who feared religious persecution in China, had failed to sufficiently explain inconsistencies in his testimony, and that the IJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial evidence. (Gao v. Barr, 7/28/20)
DHS Will Reject Initial Requests for DACA, Limit Renewals to One Year
DHS Acting Secretary Wolf issued a memo rescinding the 2017 and 2018 memoranda that rescinded DACA. Pending reconsideration of the DACA policy, DHS will reject all initial DACA requests, reject new and pending requests for advanced parole, and limit the period of renewed deferred action to one year.
AILA: Trump’s Wind-Down of DACA Once Again Throws Dreamers’ Lives into Turmoil
AILA President Jennifer Minear and AILA Executive Director Benjamin Johnson respond to the Trump administration announcement that it will begin to wind down legal protections for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) recipients while it conducts a review of the program.
BIA Grants Interlocutory Appeal Challenging Denial of Unopposed Motion to Change Venue
Unpublished BIA decision grants interlocutory appeal and remands for further consideration of unopposed motion to change venue from Atlanta to Seattle. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Miranda-Rodriguez, 7/28/20)
CA5 Finds Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Materially Changed Country Conditions in India Based on Persecution of His Caste
The court held that the petitioner, who claimed that violence against his Dalit caste in India had worsened since his removal order was issued, had failed to establish the materially changed country conditions necessary to succeed on a successive motion to reopen. (Deep v. Barr, 7/27/20)
CA3 Says BIA Misapplied Court’s Precedent When It Determined That Honduran Asylum Seeker Did Not Establish Persecution
The court held that the BIA and IJ had misstated the court’s precedent in three ways in determining that the harm the Honduran petitioner had suffered did not rise to the level of past persecution, including by requiring him to show severe physical harm. (Blanco v. Att’y Gen., 7/24/20)
CA1 Upholds Denial of Deferral of Removal to Venezuelan Petitioner Who Feared Retaliation by Drug Traffickers
The court held that, based on the administrative record, the Venezuelan petitioner, who had been convicted of heroin trafficking and found removable under INA §101(a)(43)(B), was ineligible for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture. (Sanabria Morales v. Barr, 7/24/20)
BIA Finds Plea Vacated Due to Misunderstanding of Immigration Consequences Not a Conviction
Unpublished BIA decision holds that a defendant’s failure to understand the immigration consequences of a guilty plea is a substantive and/or procedural defect that vitiates a conviction for immigration purposes. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Jaimes, 7/24/20)
CA2 Rejects Petitioner’s Argument That Former INA §321(a)(3) Violated His Right to Equal Protection
Upholding the BIA’s denial of the petitioner’s motion to reopen, the court held that it was bound by its precedent in Pierre v. Holder to reject the petitioner’s argument that former INA §321(a)(3) unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of sex. (Dale v. Barr, 7/23/20)
CA8 Finds BIA Did Not Abuse Its Discretion in Denying Motion to Reopen Based on Changed Country Conditions in Somalia
The court held that the BIA did not err in denying the petitioner’s motion to reopen his removal proceedings based on changed conditions in Somalia, finding that al-Shabaab’s activities between 2008 and 2018 did not represent a material increase in violence. (Shire v. Barr, 7/23/20)
BIA Says §13-3407 of the Arizona Revised Statues is Divisible with Regard to the Specific Drug Involved in Violation
The BIA issued a decision stating that §13-3407 of the Arizona Revised Statues, which criminalizes possession of a dangerous drug, is divisible with regard to the specific “dangerous drug” involved in a violation of that statute. Matter of P-B-B-, 28 I&N Dec. 43 (BIA 2020)
DHS Reissues Privacy Impact Assessment for CBP and ICE DNA Collection
DHS updated a previously issued PIA to provide notice to the public of biometric DNA collection from individuals detained by ICE and CBP and the associated privacy risks. DHS reissued the PIA to note that CBP Office of Field Operations is expanding the minimum age for DNA collection from 18 to 14.
Audio Recording from the July 22, 2020, NAIJ Stakeholder Town Hall Meeting
The National Association of Immigration Judges (NAIJ) hosted a virtual town hall meeting with stakeholders on July 22, 2020, to discuss the challenges facing judges, staff, counsel, respondents, and the public during EOIR’s phased reopening of the immigration courts.
BIA Grants Cancellation Hearing Where Qualifying Relative Aged Out
Unpublished BIA decision finds respondent is entitled to hearing on non-LPR cancellation despite lack of qualifying relative because IJ unduly delayed adjudicating application until respondent's U.S. citizen child was over 21. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Martinez-Perez, 7/22/20)
BIA Holds Witness Intimidation in Massachusetts Is Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds intimidation of a witness under Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 268, §13B is not a CIMT because it can be committed recklessly. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Mendoza-Lopez, 7/22/20)
CRS Releases Legal Sidebar on U.S. Immigration Laws Regulating the Admission and Exclusion of Noncitizens at the Border
CRS updated its legal sidebar on laws governing the admission and exclusion of noncitizens at the border, including procedures for asylum seekers and circumstances in which arriving noncitizens may be detained; special rules for treatment of UACs; recent policy changes; and legislative proposals.
BIA Orders Further Consideration of Continuance Pending U Visa Adjudication
Unpublished BIA decision orders further consideration of request for continuance pending adjudication of U visa petition where IJ failed to adequately consider factors under Matter of Sanchez Sosa. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Delgado-Sarmiento, 7/21/20)
CA5 Finds Substantial Evidence Supported IJ’s Adverse Credibility Determination as to LGBT Asylum Seeker from El Salvador
The court upheld the BIA’s finding that the IJ’s adverse credibility determination was not clearly erroneous under the totality of the circumstances, and found that the Salvadoran petitioner could not prevail on his due process claim. (Santos-Alvarado v. Barr, 7/21/20)