Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0
On the first day of his second term, President Trump suspended all entries at the U.S. Southern Border for asylum seekers. Since then, the Administration has implemented sweeping restrictions that shut America’s doors to people fleeing persecution. These policies violate federal law, erode constitutionally protected due process, exacerbate the asylum backlog, and give those seeking safety an increasingly narrow path to protection.
Left unchecked by Congress, these policies will have dire consequences for both asylum seekers and the integrity of our legal system. Asylum seekers—especially those without access to counsel—are at grave risk of being returned to harm.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The Administration can maintain order at U.S. borders and effectively manage migration without sacrificing fairness and adherence to the law. With more trained asylum officers, a streamlined legal process, legal representation for asylum seekers, and more effective coordination between relevant agencies, the U.S. can establish a safe, orderly, and humane asylum system.
Browse the Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0 collection
CA8 Denies Withholding of Removal to Evangelical Christians from Mexico
The court held that the petitioners did not show that the conditions in their town rose to the level of persecution, and that they could relocate to a different part of Mexico to avoid persecution as Evangelical Christians. (Alavez-Hernandez v. Holder, 5/8/13)
Senators Advance Both Good and Bad Amendments on Bipartisan Bill
AILA released a press statement regarding the hundreds of amendments to S. 744 filed yesterday by Republican and Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
BIA Remands Moldova Asylum Applicant for Entry of New Decision
Unpublished BIA decision remanding record as IJ didn’t adequately addressed respondent’s corroborative evidence in his conclusion that respondent did not establish past persecution and that the new entry must be based on applicable 9th Circuit and BIA precedents. Special thanks to Michael Alexei.
Asylum Division Officer Training Course One-Year Filing Deadline Lesson Plan
USCIS provided the ADOTC lesson plan on one-year filing deadline. This lesson describes the statutory bar to applying for asylum more than one year after an alien's date of last arrival.
BIA on the Effect of Dual Nationality on an Asylum Claim
The Board held that an individual who is a citizen or national of more than one country, but has no fear of persecution in one of the those countries, does not qualify as a refugee under INA §101(a)(42). Matter of B-R-, 26 I&N Dec. 119 (BIA 2013)
CA9 Finds Asylum Applicant’s Proposed Social Group Lacks Sufficient Particularity
The court held that the petitioner’s proposed social group - which he described as disabled persons, insulin-dependent diabetics, or insulin dependent diabetics who suffer from mental illness - lacked sufficient particularity. (Mendoza-Alvarez v. Holder, 5/3/13)
CA9 to Rehear Case on Credibility Determinations En Banc
The court ordered that Oshodi v. Holder, which discussed credibility determinations under the REAL ID Act, be reheard en banc. (Oshodi v. Holder, 5/3/12)
VOICE: May/June 2013
The latest issue of VOICE offers insight on applying for asylum on behalf of atheists, hiring competent employees, preparing adjudicator-friendly applications, and more! Also, complete our crossword puzzle correctly and save 20% on the Immigration Forms Toolbox!
DOJ OIL May 2013 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for May 2013, with articles on German enforcement of general school-attendance laws and asylum eligibility and the Adverse Credibility project, as well as litigation highlights, recent circuit court decisions, and monthly topical parentheticals.
CA10 Remands Nepali Asylum Case, Finds BIA Failed to Properly Consider Evidence
The court remanded the CAT and asylum claims back to the BIA, holding that the BIA failed to consider supporting evidence and that the record compelled the conclusion that the petitioner suffered past persecution by Maoists in Nepal. (Karki v. Holder, 4/30/13)
CA4 on "Willful Blindness" Standard in CAT Relief Case
The court held that the BIA used the correct standard when considering whether the government officials would acquiesce to his torture, and that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s decision to deny CAT protection. (Suarez-Valenzuela v. Holder, 4/24/13)
AILA Comments on I-94 Automation
AILA's comments on the CBP interim final rule "Definition of Form I-94 to Include Electronic Format," which automates Form I-94 and changes the process of documenting the admission or parole of certain individuals. Special thanks to the AILA CBP and Verification committees.
DHS Annual Report on Refugee & Asylee Numbers for 2012
The DHS Office of Immigration Statistics April 2013 Annual Flow Report on refugee & asylee admissions for 2012. In 2012, there were a total of 58,179 persons who were admitted to the United States as refugees & 29,484 individuals who were granted asylum in 2012.
CA8 Denies Colombian Petitioner’s Withholding and CAT Claims
The court held that the petitioner was not eligible for withholding of removal because she failed to establish that it would be unreasonable for her to relocate, and found she had not suffered from past persecution. (Castro-Gutierrez v. Holder, 4/22/13)
CA1 Upholds Adverse Credibility Determination in Asylum Case
The court upheld the IJ’s finding that Petitioner lacked credibility, noting that he made several amendments to his asylum application only after a change in law that would have affected his claim. (Liu v. Holder, 4/22/13)
IJ Grants Deferral of Removal Under CAT to Mentally Ill Respondent
The immigration judge granted deferral of removal under CAT, and held that the long-term use of physical restraints and psychotropic drugs in a Mexican psychiatric institution constitutes torture. Courtesy of Anna Markovich.
BIA Reverses Adverse Credibility Finding Against Antiguan Asylum Applicant
In an unpublished decision, the Board held that the IJ’s adverse credibility finding was clear error, and that the respondent established past persecution at the hands of police officers in Antigua and Barbuda on account of his sexual orientation. Special thanks to NIJC.
BIA Reverses IJ on Severity of Past Persecution
In an unpublished decision, the BIA held that the asylum applicant had compelling reasons for being unwilling to return to Liberia because of the severity of the persecution he suffered, despite a fundamental change in country circumstances. Courtesy of Stephen Meili.
USCIS Memo on the Expansion and Extension of the Credible Fear Determination Checklist Pilot
USCIS Asylum Division memo dated 4/11/13 from Acting Chief Ted Kim expanding the credible fear determination checklist pilot to include all credible fear cases regardless of jurisdiction, effective through 9/30/13.
Unpublished BIA Case Sustains Appeal and Remands Asylum Case to Different IJ
The Board sustained the appeal for reconsideration of the respondent’s credibility and her eligibility for asylum from Syria. BIA also granted the respondent’s request for future proceedings to be before a different Immigration Judge. Courtesy of Robert DeKelaita.
CA9 Vacates BIA Determination on “Particularly Serious Crime”
The court remanded the case, holding that INA §241(b)(3)(B)(iv) establishes only one category of “per se” particularly serious crimes and requires DHS to conduct a case-by-case analysis of convictions falling outside this category. (Blandino-Medina v. Holder, 4/10/13)
CA9 Upholds Denial of Relief to Petitioner Who Practiced Da Zang Gong
The court upheld the BIA’s denial of asylum to the Chinese petitioner who asserted a fear of persecution on account of his practice of Da Zang Gong, finding there was substantial evidence supporting the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. (Cui v. Holder, 4/10/13)
CA7 Finds BIA and IJ Overlooked Material Evidence
The court remanded the case, holding that the IJ and BIA overlooked material evidence demonstrating that the petitioner suffered past persecution in Palestine on account of his political opinion. (Jabr v. Holder, 4/2/13)
CA7 Holds BIA Error in Asylum Case is Harmless
The court found that the BIA’s conclusory rejection of the petitioner’s argument was a harmless error, because the BIA could have reasonably concluded the highly generalized evidence was insufficient. (Zheng v. Holder, 3/27/13)
Immigration Law Advisor, March 2013 (Vol. 7, No. 3)
Immigration Law Advisor, a legal publication from EOIR, with an article on asylum claims based upon a “pattern or practice” of persecution, circuit court decisions for February 2013, and a regulatory update.