Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0
On the first day of his second term, President Trump suspended all entries at the U.S. Southern Border for asylum seekers. Since then, the Administration has implemented sweeping restrictions that shut America’s doors to people fleeing persecution. These policies violate federal law, erode constitutionally protected due process, exacerbate the asylum backlog, and give those seeking safety an increasingly narrow path to protection.
Left unchecked by Congress, these policies will have dire consequences for both asylum seekers and the integrity of our legal system. Asylum seekers—especially those without access to counsel—are at grave risk of being returned to harm.
It doesn’t have to be this way. The Administration can maintain order at U.S. borders and effectively manage migration without sacrificing fairness and adherence to the law. With more trained asylum officers, a streamlined legal process, legal representation for asylum seekers, and more effective coordination between relevant agencies, the U.S. can establish a safe, orderly, and humane asylum system.
Browse the Featured Issue: Asylum Under Trump 2.0 collection
CA7 Denies Motion to Reopen Based on Change in Country Conditions
The asylum applicant argued her case should be reopened due to the birth of her two USC children and the enforcement of China’s family planning policy, but the court held there was a change in personal circumstances, not country conditions. (Zheng v. Holder, 11/27/12)
CA3 Denies Asylum Applicant’s Motion to Reopen
The court upheld the BIA’s denial of the motion to reopen, noting that the petitioner did not show how he acquired the previously unavailable evidence and that he failed to file a new asylum application as required by the regulations. (Lin v. Atty’ Gen., 11/27/12)
CA7 Holds Political Opinion Was Not Central Motivation for Persecution of Asylum Applicant
The court rejected the argument that the IJ improperly required political opinion to be the “primary” reason the petitioner was persecuted, finding that substantial evidence showed political opinion was not a central motivation. (Shaikh v. Holder, 11/26/12)
CA7 Rejects Constitutional Challenge to Asylum Regulation
The court found that it did not have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s conclusion that the petitioner’s asylum application was untimely, rejecting the argument that 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5)(iv) is unconstitutionally vague. (Vrljicak v. Holder, 11/20/12)
CA4 Holds Asylum Applicant is Subject To Material Support Bar
The court found that the BIA did not err when it held that the petitioner was statutorily ineligible for asylum and withholding of removal because he was a member of, and provided material support to, a terrorist organization. (Viegas v. Holder, 11/19/12)
AILA/EOIR Liaison Meeting Minutes (11/15/12)
Official minutes from the AILA EOIR and OCAHO Liaison Committees’ meeting with EOIR on 11/15/12. Topics include publication of OCAHO decisions, OCAHO caseload, ICPM and court practices, telephonic hearings, bond hearings, asylum filings, regulatory updates, and more.
AILA Amicus on Asylum Claims Based on Domestic Violence
AILA amicus brief submitted to the BIA on 11/14/12, arguing that domestic violence may form the basis of an asylum or withholding of removal claim.
BIA on Definition of Particularly Serious Crime for Asylum Purposes
The BIA held that Matter of N-A-M-, which held that an offense need not be an aggravated felony to be considering a particularly serious crime for purposes of barring asylum, applies to cases in the Third Circuit. Matter of M-H-, 26 I&N Dec. 46 (BIA 2012)
USCIS Policy Memo on TRIG Exemption for Participation in Iraqi Uprisings
USCIS policy memo dated 11/12/12 with guidance on implementation of a terrorism-related inadmissibility ground (TRIG) exemption for certain individuals who are inadmissible due to participation in or association with the Iraqi uprisings from 3/1/1991 through 4/5/1991.
CA1 Denies Guatemalan Withholding Claim
The court held that the petitioner did not show that the persecution of his family members was causally linked to family membership and found that “victims of gang threats and possible extortion” is an overly broad social group. (Tay-Chan v. Holder, 11/9/12)
CA1 Denies Asylum Based on Perceived Wealth of Family
The court held that the petitioner had not provided sufficient evidence to establish a well-founded fear of persecution based on his family membership, and rejected the argument that his family was targeted for their perceived wealth. (Perlera-Sola v. Holder, 11/9/12)
CA6 Denies Senegalese Asylum Claim Based on FGM
The court rejected the petitioner’s asylum claim based on her fear that her daughters will be subject to FGM if they return to Senegal, and held that DHS rebutted the presumption of future persecution based on her own resistance to FGM. (Dieng v. Holder, 11/8/12)
CA11 Denies Untimely Motion to Reopen Based on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
The court upheld the BIA’s decision to deny the untimely motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel, and found the petitioner failed to demonstrate changed circumstances in gang violence in Honduras. (Ruiz-Turcios v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 11/8/12)
NSC Liaison Q&As from Refugee/Asylee Product Line (11/8/12)
The NSC Liaison Committee unofficial Q&As from AILA and other stakeholders from the 11/8/12 teleconference with NSC on the refugee and asylee product line. Topics include I-730 processing times, DNA testing, physical mailing addresses, transfer notices, medicals, and more.
CA8 Remands Asylum and Cancellation Case to BIA
The court remanded the case, holding that the BIA’s basis for rejecting the asylum claim was unclear and may have relied on an incorrect statement of law, and that it engaged in improper fact-finding when considering the cancellation claim. (Flores v. Holder, 11/7/12)
CA8 Upholds Denial of Motion to Terminate under FFOA
The court denied the petitioner’s asylum application, and rejected her argument that the BIA erred in denying her petition to terminate removal proceedings under the Federal First Offender Act (FFOA). (Brikova v. Holder, 11/7/12)
BIA Questions on Particular Social Group
The BIA issued a notice of oral argument in an asylum case before the BIA. The notice listed questions related to particular social group claims for counsel to be prepared to discuss at the hearing, including questions on the social visibility and particularity requirements.
USCIS Adjustment of Status Form I-485 Performance Data
USCIS performance data containing numerical information on adjustment of status applications, including the number of receipts, approvals, denials, and pending cases by field office from FY2010 through FY2012.
CA1 on "Social Visibility" in Asylum Cases
The court denied the withholding applications which were based on the petitioners’ fear that their U.S. citizen son could be kidnapped if they returned to Mexico, after discussing the “social visibility” requirement. (Rojas-Perez v. Holder, 11/5/12)
CA4 on Adverse Credibility Determinations
The court denied withholding of removal and CAT relief, upholding the IJ’s adverse credibility determination and rejecting the petitioner’s argument that the IJ and BIA misapplied REAL ID’s credibility provisions. (Singh v. Holder, 11/5/12)
NSC Stakeholder Newsletter, October 2012
NSC October 2012 stakeholder newsletter, which includes information on developments on deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA), derivate refugee and asylum status, and more.
CA8 Finds No Objectively Reasonable Fear of Future Persecution for Kenyan Professor
The court denied asylum, upholding the BIA’s conclusion that the petitioner did not show an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution and rejecting the argument that the IJ violated due process rights by delaying his decision. (Wanyama v. Holder, 11/1/12)
DOJ OIL October 2012 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ Office of Immigration Litigation (OIL) October 2012 Litigation Bulletin where First Circuit ruled that spouse of an individual forced to undergo an abortion under China’s coercive population control policy is not automatically entitled to asylum & other decisions.
CA8 Finds Asylum Applicant Committed Serious, Nonpolitical Crime
The court upheld the BIA’s conclusion that the petitioner committed a “serious, nonpolitical crime” when he attacked a family planning official in China, and was thus ineligible for asylum under INA §208(b)(2)(A)(iii). (Zheng v. Holder, 10/31/12)
CA8 Denies Motion to Reopen Asylum Case Based on Material Change in Circumstances
The court held that two new letters in support of the petitioner’s asylum claim did not establish a change in circumstances or undermine the initial determination that he failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution. (Lopez-Mendez v. Holder, 10/29/12)