Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
3,526 - 3,550 of 12,970 collection items
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA11 Remands to BIA to Determine Depth of IJ’s Inquiry Into Voluntariness in Ineffective Assistance Claim

The court found petitioner failed to order transcript, and held it could rely on IJ’s record reconstruction; here, record was inadequately memorialized, so CA11 determined it could be incomplete and remanded to determine the scope of the recreation. (Flores-Panameno v. Att’y Gen., 1/22/19)

1/22/19 AILA Doc. No. 19020537. Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Press Releases

Damaging Bill Is a Bait-and-Switch on Immigration

A bill slated for introduction in the Senate would fund President Trump’s border wall, but as AILA notes, it also includes many extreme provisions impacting asylum law, Temporary Protected Status holders, and more, that go far beyond what the president laid out in his recent speech.

AILA Quicktake #257: Senate Introduces Its Spending Bill

Greg Chen, Director of AILA's Government Relations, discusses the spending bill introduced by the Senate late Monday night. The bill includes many concerning provisions regarding DACA, TPS, and asylum policy.

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Withdraws Opinion on Categorical Approach and Files Substitute Memorandum Disposition

The court withdraws an opinion filed on 8/29/18 and concurrently files a substitute memorandum disposition. The government’s petition for panel rehearing and motion for judicial notice are denied. No further petitions for rehearing en banc may be filed. (Lorenzo v. Whitaker, 1/17/19)

1/17/19 AILA Doc. No. 19012201. Crimes, Removal & Relief

HHS OIG Issues Report on Separated Children Placed in ORR Care

HHS OIG issued a report finding that the total number of children separated from a parent or guardian by immigration authorities is unknown. The report found that thousands of children may have been separated during an influx that began in 2017, before the accounting required.

1/17/19 AILA Doc. No. 19011733. Admissions & Border, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Upholds BIA Denial of MTR for Failure to Show Material Change in Country Conditions for Asylum

The court found gang and cartel violence in Mexico between 2012 and 2018 had not materially changed; rather, gang/cartel violence was a persistent problem and one that petitioner failed to prove would impact her as an “imputed American citizen.” (Garcia-Aguilar v. Whitaker, 1/16/19)

1/16/19 AILA Doc. No. 19020535. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Upholds BIA Denial of Untimely Filed MTR, Finds No Relevant Exceptions

The court held motion to reopen denial based on ambiguous record of mailing address was not abuse of discretion; no jurisdiction to review changed country conditions as it’s question of fact; and no due process violation because no liberty interest exists in MTR. (Mejia v. Whitaker, 1/16/19)

1/16/19 AILA Doc. No. 19020805. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds Georgia Theft by Shoplifting Not a CIMT

Unpublished BIA decision holds that theft by shoplifting under Geo. Code Ann. 16-8-14 is not a CIMT because the statute does not require that the owner’s property rights be permanently or substantially eroded. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Vo, 1/16/19)

1/16/19 AILA Doc. No. 19090508. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Upholds BIA Denials of Asylum and Withholding, Affirms No Duress or De Minimus Exceptions to Material Support Bar

The court held Annachamy foreclosed duress argument, and, thus, was not colorable claim for jurisdiction over otherwise unreviewable determination; also held plain text of material support bar unambiguously contained no exception for de minimus funds. (Rayamajhi v. Whitaker, 1/15/19)

1/15/19 AILA Doc. No. 19020832. Asylum, Removal & Relief

TRAC Reports that Cancelled Immigration Court Hearings Grow as Shutdown Continues

TRAC reports that as of 1/11/19, the estimated number of Immigration Court hearing cancellations due to the federal government shutdown reached 42,726. Each week the shutdown continues, cancelled hearings will likely grow by another 20,000.

1/14/19 AILA Doc. No. 19011504. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds Florida Statute Not Sexual Abuse of a Minor

Unpublished BIA decision holds that traveling to meet a minor under Fla. Stat. 847.0135(4)(a) is not sexual abuse of a minor because it applies to victims aged 16 and over. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Rodriguez-Danu, 1/11/19)

1/11/19 AILA Doc. No. 19090410. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Upholds BIA Determination of Untimely MTR, Denies Jurisdiction to Review BIA Decision to Not Exercise Sua Sponte Authority to Reopen

The court affirmed I-130 filed after removal order was not statutory exception to deadline, nor was it extraordinary circumstance to trigger equitable tolling; CA6 also declined to decide if §242(a)(2)(D) confers jurisdiction in constitutional-claim context. (Gyamfi v. Whitaker, 1/10/19)

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

Ohio Attorneys Sue ICE Alleging Public, Humanitarian, and Bioethical Abuse

Attorneys David Malik and Anna Markovich submitted a FOIA request asking ICE for information about the people who have been deported, ICE’s policies related to racial and ethnic profiling, and ICE’s process for determining which individuals to deport. (Malik v. ICE, 1/9/19)

1/9/19 AILA Doc. No. 19012832. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Upholds BIA Dismissal of Appeal from Withholding Denial for Lack of Nexus Due to Alleged Protected Ground

The court did not reach whether harm constituted persecution or petitioner was member of proposed PSG (related to disabled family member) because it affirmed no nexus; rather, evidence showed rejection of gang membership triggered harassment. (Cortez-Mendez v. Whitaker, 1/7/19)

1/7/19 AILA Doc. No. 19020702. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Holds BIA’s Adverse Credibility Determination Supported by Explicitly Considered and Substantial Evidence

The court held BIA did not err in relying on inconsistencies between testimony, application, and affidavits; nor did it err in determining that corroborating documentary evidence was reiterative and failed to resolve the inconsistencies within main narrative. (Ghotra v. Whitaker, 1/4/19)

1/4/19 AILA Doc. No. 19020804. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds Texas Aggravated Assault with Deadly Weapon Not a Firearms Offense

Unpublished BIA decision holds that aggravated assault with deadly weapon under Tex. Penal Code 22.02(a) is not a firearms offense because the statute does not require use of a firearm. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Gill, 1/4/19)

1/4/19 AILA Doc. No. 19082702. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

District Court Stops ICE from Re-detaining Certain Cambodian Nationals Without at Least 14 Days’ Notice

The court found the government failed to provide assurances for reasonable pre-detention notice, and that it failed to oppose the TRO application; the court issued the TRO and ordered the government show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue. (Chhoeun v. Marin, 1/3/19)

1/3/19 AILA Doc. No. 18092537. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA3 Holds Wire Fraud Conviction Was CIMT

The court denied in part and dismissed in part petitioner’s petitions for review, holding that per Nijhawan, her prior conviction for wire fraud constituted an offense involving fraud or deceit in which the loss to the victims exceeded $10,000 and was a CIMT. (Ku v. Att’y Gen., 1/3/19)

1/3/19 AILA Doc. No. 19012230. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Upholds BIA/IJ Denial of Cancellation, Holds Offense Under Wisconsin Battery Statute Is Crime of Violence

The court denied petitioner’s petition for review and rejected that Wisconsin’s battery statute was categorically not a crime of violence. (Beltran-Aguilar v. Whitaker, 1/2/19)

1/2/19 AILA Doc. No. 19011808. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief

The Courthouse Trap: How ICE Operations Impacted New York’s Courts in 2018

The Immigrant Defense Project issued a report highlighting trends in ICE courthouse enforcement and provides a selection of stories of individual New Yorkers who have been arrested while attending court.

1/1/19 AILA Doc. No. 19013040. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Holds Fraud Determination Supported by Substantial Evidence

In an unpublished decision, the court held BIA did not err in relying on sentencing-related material and found substantial evidence confirmed an offense of fraud. It also distinguished Pereira to confirm BIA jurisdiction. (Calderon Leonard v. Whitaker, 12/31/18)

12/31/18 AILA Doc. No. 19011815. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Found Lack of Past Persecution or Well-Founded Fear of Future Persecution for English-Speaking Cameroonian

The court held harm perpetrated by Cameroonian gendarmerie did not meet past persecution; that petitioner failed to satisfy the objective element for fear of future persecution; and that failure to meet asylum eligibility foreclosed withholding and CAT. (Njong v. Whitaker, 12/28/18)

12/28/18 AILA Doc. No. 19011813. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds Connecticut Drug Statute Not a Controlled Substance Offense

Unpublished BIA decision holds that possession of a narcotic substance under Conn. Gen. Stat. 21a-279(a) is not a controlled substance offense because state drug schedule contains substances not listed on federal schedule. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ross, 12/28/18)

12/28/18 AILA Doc. No. 19082700. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds California Carjacking Not an Aggravated Felony

Unpublished BIA decision holds carjacking under Cal. Pen. Code 215(a) is not an aggravated felony theft offense because the taking can be committed against a passenger or other person temporarily in possession of the vehicle. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ibarra Juarez, 12/28/18

12/28/18 AILA Doc. No. 19082701. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Panel Issued Amended Decision on “Crime of Domestic Violence” Conviction

The court issued an amended decision, where the panel concluded that a class one misdemeanor domestic violence assault under Arizona Revised Statutes §§ 13-1203 and 13-3601 conviction was a “crime of domestic violence” under 8 USC §1227(a)(2)(E). (Cornejo-Villagrana v. Whitaker, 12/27/18)

12/27/18 AILA Doc. No. 19012836. Crimes, Removal & Relief