Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
Parties Reach Settlement in Class Action Lawsuit Challenging ICE’s Practice of Conducting Warrantless Arrests and Vehicle Stops
The district court approved the settlement agreement reached by the parties, which among other things, provides that ICE must issue a new nationwide policy regarding warrantless arrests and vehicle stops and undergo training nationwide. (Castañon Nava, et al. v. DHS, et al., 2/8/22)
AILA Teams Up with the ACLU and Others to Tear Down Barriers to Access to Counsel
In this blog post, AILA Executive Director Benjamin Johnson describes the lawsuit AILA joined as plaintiff in response to ICE and Geo Group creating unlawful barriers to attorney-client communications.
CA2 Remands to BIA to Apply Correct Standard of Review on Good Faith Marriage Question
The court found BIA erred in applying clear error, instead of de novo, standard of review to IJ’s good faith marriage waiver denial; it also held petitioner abandoned abuse of discretion claim on MTR denial because he failed to adequately argue it in brief. (Alom v. Whitaker, 12/17/18)
CA6 Finds Conviction for Rape by Digital Penetration Under Ohio Rape Statute Does Not Match Federal Definition
The court held BIA erred in conflating “rape” and “sexual abuse” definitions to conclude that generic rape crime included digital penetration; under Ohio law, digital penetration is not rape for purposes of aggravated felony-based removal. (Keeley v. Whitaker, 12/17/18)
BIA Holds Colorado Vehicular Eluding Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds that vehicular eluding under Colo. Rev. Stat. 18-9-116.5 is not a CIMT because it does not require perpetrators to drive recklessly or create a risk of bodily injury to another person. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Erazo-Aguirre, 12/17/18)
BIA Holds Respondent Not Inadmissible for Conviction Subject to 212(c) Waiver
Unpublished BIA decision holds that respondent is not inadmissible based on a conviction for which he was previously granted a waiver under former INA 212(c). Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Morel-Uceta, 12/14/18)
ICE Releases FY2018 ERO Administrative Arrests and ICE Removals
ICE released statistics on FY2018 ERO administrative arrests and ICE removals
CA6 Grants Review of BIA Denial of Cancellation, Holds Findings Were Not Supported by Record and BIA Failed to Apply Appropriate Standard of Review
The court determined BIA erred in finding new evidence was previously available, and BIA failed to consider hardship ground raised in the MTR, instead offering a cursory analysis that didn’t allow for meaningful review; remanded to properly apply law. (Hernandez-Perez v. Whitaker, 12/14/18)
ICE Releases FY2018 ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Report
ICE released a report that summarized U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) activities in FY2018.
CA11 Upholds BIA’s §237(a)(2)(B)(i) Removability Determination for Possession of Cocaine Based on Florida Drug Possession Statute’s Divisibility
The court denied petition for review, finding that based on state law precedent and jury instructions, the identity of a controlled substance is an element of Fla. Stat. §893.13(6)(a) and that BIA correctly found possession of cocaine a removable offense. (Guillen v. Att’y Gen., 12/13/18)
Former IJ Jeffrey Chase Explains How “Family Unit” Memo Creates More Obstacles for Families
Former Immigration Judge Jeffrey Chase discussed the EOIR memo that announced the end of a reprieve on the prioritization of “Family Unit” cases, “under conditions designed to speed them through the immigration court system, ready or not, with or without representation, due process be damned.”
AILA Files Amicus Brief on Applicability of the Reinstatement Bar on Reopening in VAWA Cases
AILA filed an amicus brief with the Ninth Circuit in Rodarte-Gonzalez v. Whitaker, arguing that individuals eligible for VAWA relief are not subject to the reinstatement bar on reopening.
Former State and Federal Judges Sent Letter to ICE Expressing Concern About Courthouse Arrests
On 12/12/18, nearly 70 former state and federal judges expressed concern about ICE’s continued reliance on immigration enforcement activities inside courthouses, stating that the public must be able to access courthouses safely and that “ICE’s courthouse arrests have made courts places to avoid.”
CA1 Upholds BIA Reversal of IJ Grant of CAT Deferral to Domestic Violence Victim
The court denied petition for review and held the BIA correctly found the petitioner was unable to prove that the Dominican government acquiesced in her domestic abuse; thus, failed to meet the CAT definition of “torture” mandated for deferral of removal. (Ruiz-Guerrero v. Whitaker, 12/12/18)
CA8 Denies Petition for Review, Finding No Due Process Violations by IJ
The court found although IJ stopped petitioner’s attorney from listing potential PSGs (potential denial of right to counsel), there was no prejudice because IJ considered three PSGs; and IJ was not biased by asking about her failure to report crimes to police. (Molina v. Whitaker, 12/12/18)
CA1 Upholds IJ/BIA Denial of Asylum Due to Lack of Nexus to a Protected Ground
The court found petitioner secretly informed Ecuadorian police about gangs suffered persecution, but failed to prove he was targeted due to political opinion or particular social group since there was no evidence that his attackers knew he was an informant. (Mendez v. Whitaker, 12/11/18)
CA2 Vacates Unlawful Reentry Sentence Imposed on Noncitizen Based on Incorrect “Drug Trafficking Offense” Finding, and Remands for Resentencing
Using the categorical approach, the court held AZ’s drug law was overbroad; thus, district court erred in finding defendant’s prior conviction a “drug trafficking offense” that subjected him to 2016 Guidelines’ higher sentencing than that of 2014 Guidelines. (U.S. v. Guerrero, 12/10/18)
CA3 Holds PA Child Endangerment Statute Does Not Categorically Match INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i) Definition of Child Abuse
The court found BIA erred in finding 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. §4303(a)(1) is a categorical match for removability; rather, it does not have the requisite risk requirement to match INA’s “likelihood of harm” standard; remanded to consider alternative removal ground. (Liao v. Att’y Gen., 12/10/18)
BIA Upholds Grant of Adjustment of Status to Applicant with Three DUIs
Unpublished BIA decision upholds discretionary grant of adjustment application for respondent with three DUIs in light of more than 20 years’ residence, consistent employment, and passage of time since most recent offense. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Velasquez Chavez, 12/10/18)
BIA Reopens Proceedings Sua Sponte for TPS Holder to Adjust Status
Unpublished BIA decision reopens proceedings sua sponte for respondent to apply for adjustment of status in light of grant of TPS and recent reentry pursuant to grant of advance parole. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Sylvestre, 12/10/18)
CA9 Denies Government’s Motion for Stay of Restraining Order Enjoining Interim Final Rule on Asylum Claims
The court denied the government’s motion for a stay of the district court’s temporary restraining order enjoining the government from implementing the 11/9/18 interim final rule on asylum claims along the southern border. (East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, 12/7/18)
D. Nev. Grants Noncitizen’s Motion to Dismiss 8 USC §1326 Indictment Based on Initial Removal Order’s Invalidity Due to IJ’s Lack of Jurisdiction per
The court held NTA failed to include time and place, so IJ did not have jurisdiction to issue initial removal order; that and subsequent removal order were, thus, void, leaving no predicate element for the §1326 violation indictment. (United States v. Soto-Mejia, 12/7/18)
CA4 Grants Review, Holds DHS Failed to Meet Its Burden of Proving Petitioner’s Entry Date for Purposes of CIMT Removal Within Five Years of Admission
The court held DHS failed to sustain its burden of proving that petitioner, who committed CIMT in 2012, was admitted in 2008 AOS, rather than 2002 airport entry as claimed with unrebutted evidence; CA4 also ordered BIA to grant motion to terminate. (Mauricio-Vasquez v. Whitaker, 12/6/18)
CA8 Upholds BIA Denial of Motion to Reconsider Its Reversal of IJ’s Grant of Discretionary AOS Based on IJ’s Impermissible Reassessment of Conviction
The court held that BIA met the “rational explanation” standard of review in denying the motion and did not engage in fact-finding when it considered the sufficiency of the evidence after determining that the IJ incorrectly went behind the record of conviction. (Camacho v. Whitaker, 12/6/18)
District Court Enjoins Sheriff’s Practice of Detaining Noncitizens with Release Eligibility Based on ICE Detainers
The court held El Paso, CO county does not have state or federal authorization to detain release-eligible noncitizens pursuant to ICE detainers, and that such detention violates due process, right to bail, and reasonable seizure provisions of CO constitution. (Cisneros v. Elder, 12/6/18)