Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
10,126 - 10,150 of 12,970 collection items
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Statement by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano: Disaster Response in Haiti

On 01/15/10, DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano made a statement regarding DHS’s disaster response in Haiti, and suspension of removal for individuals from Haiti.

Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA on Advisals Required Upon Granting Voluntary Departure and Proof of Posting Bond

The BIA remanded for IJ to grant a new period of voluntary departure and to provide required advisals. Matter of Gamero, 25 I&N Dec. 164 (BIA 2010)

1/13/10 AILA Doc. No. 10011461. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Applies Modified Categorical on Conviction Relating to a Controlled Substance

CA9 denied petition, finding conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11379(a), qualifies for removal, so long as substance involved is determined to have been controlled substance under the modified categorical approach. (Hernandez-Aguilar v. Holder, 1/12/10)

1/12/10 AILA Doc. No. 10030969. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA10 Finds K-2 Visa Holder Over 21 Years-Old Did Not “Age Out”

CA10 held that a K-2 visa holder who timely applies for adjustment of status under INA § 245(d) must be under 21 when he or she seeks to enter the U.S., but not when the adjustment application is finally adjudicated. (Carpio v. Holder, 1/12/10)

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Gives Deference to BIA Holding on Asylum and Forced IUDs

The court held that the BIA’s interpretation that involuntary insertion of an IUD is not “involuntary sterilization” and not a per se ground for granting asylum is entitled to deference. (Huang v. Holder, 1/12/10)

1/12/10 AILA Doc. No. 10021766. Asylum, Removal & Relief
AILA Blog

Unaccountable Foxes Still Standing Guard Over The Same Inhumane Henhouse

by Lory Rosenberg, AILA Board of Governors member The emerging evidence of DHS's disregard and cover-up of immigrant deaths in detention is unconscionable and belongs on page one of everyone's human rights agenda. Yes, these deaths occurred 2+ years ago, but there has been no meaningful action taken

AILA Blog

Secret Horror Stories: ICE Officials Hid The Truth About Immigrant Deaths In Detention

All Americans should be outraged by the Sunday New York Times report about how ICE officials schemed to cover up the deaths of detainees in detention. http://bit.ly/6p2xlX. The online edition includes a link to a horrifying video of an ICE detainee, Mr. Boubacar Bah, who, after mysteriously sufferin

Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Immigration Law Advisor, December 2009 (Vol. 3, No. 12)

Immigration Law Advisor, a legal publication from EOIR, with an article on the top twenty immigration cases from 2009, federal court activity for November 2009, recent BIA precedent decisions, and a regulatory update.

1/10/10 AILA Doc. No. 14041608. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 on Federal Jurisdiction in Extreme Hardship I-751 Waiver Cases

CA9 concluded that IIRIRA does not bar the court from reviewing whether the respondent has demonstrated “extreme hardship” and is thus eligible for an I-751 waiver of the joint filing requirement to remove the conditions on residence. (Singh v. Holder, 1/8/10)

Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA on the Rebuttable Presumption of Reciprocal Disciplinary Sanctions

The BIA found that where the respondent was disbarred in New York and he failed to rebut the presumption that reciprocal discipline should be imposed, his suspension for seven years was an appropriate sanction. Matter of Kronegold, 25 I&N Dec. 157 (BIA 2010)

1/7/10 AILA Doc. No. 10010862. Ethics, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Remands Finding Suspended Non-incarceratory Sanction Not “Conviction”

CA9 remanded finding definition of "conviction" 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(48) does not include criminal judgments whose only consequence is a suspended non-incarceratory sanction. Therefore, petitioner has not been shown to be subject to removal. (Retuta v. Holder, 1/7/10)

1/7/10 AILA Doc. No. 10030464. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

DHS Notice on External Investigations System of Records

DHS notice on the updating and reissuing of a system of records titled, DHS USCIS-009 External Investigations System of Records. Certain categories have been updated to clarify the nature of law enforcement investigatory records maintained by ICE. (75 FR 404, 01/05/10)

1/5/10 AILA Doc. No. 10010663. Crimes, Removal & Relief, Students & Schools
Practice Resources, Litigation Resources, Sample Briefs

Verified Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Sample verified application for writ of habeas corpus and complaint to remedy Petitioner’s unlawful and unreasonably long detention. (January 2010) (Verified Application)

1/1/10 AILA Doc. No. 11080368. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Affirms BIA Denial of Motion to Reopen in Asylum Case Pursuant to Removal

The court found that BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying asylum based on the statutory requirement that one must be present in the U.S. to be eligible for asylum. (Sadhvani v. Holder, 12/31/09).

12/31/09 AILA Doc. No. 10033063. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Finds State Felon-in-Possession Offense Conviction Constitutes Aggravated Felony

CA5 affirmed denial of petition for cancellation of removal, finding that state felon-in-possession offenses need not have an interstate commerce element in order for the offense to be an offense “described in” 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). (Hernandez v. Holder, 12/30/09)

12/30/09 AILA Doc. No. 10012974. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief

Report on Detention of Refugees in the U.S. Who Fail to Adjust

On 12/29/09, Human Rights Watch issued a report titled “Jailing Refugees Arbitrary Detention of Refugees in the US Who Fail to Adjust to Permanent Resident Status.” The report recommends changing U.S. law to close the legal loophole that allows for detaining these refugees.

12/29/09 AILA Doc. No. 10010566. Adjustment of Status, Asylum, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 on Establishing Required Period of Residency for Cancellation of Removal

CA5 affirmed, finding petitioner ineligible for cancellation of removal based on failure to establish required period of residency under INA §240A(a). CA5 found the rationale of CA3 in Augustin persuasive in rejecting petitioner’s arguments. (Deus v. Holder, 12/23/09)

12/23/09 AILA Doc. No. 10012970. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 on Mandatory Detention Following Release from non-DHS Custody

The court held that the INA contemplates mandatory detention following release from non-DHS custody for a specified offense, not merely any release from non-DHS custody. (Saysana v. Gillen, 12/23/09)

12/23/09 AILA Doc. No. 09122330. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA Files Amicus Brief in the Supreme Court in Kiyemba v. Obama

AILA filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court in the case Kiyemba v. Obama, arguing that immigration law poses no meaningful barrier to the petitioners’ release from detention into the U.S. pursuant to the District Court’s habeas corpus authority.

12/23/09 AILA Doc. No. 09231222. Asylum, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Finds Immigration Court Erred by Failure to Serve Counsel of Record with Hearing Notice

CA9 reversed BIA decision that adopted IJ’s in absentia removal order and granted petition, finding that the immigration court erred because it did not serve petitioner's counsel of record with a hearing notice. (Hamazaspyan v. Holder, 12/21/09)

12/21/09 AILA Doc. No. 10030967. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA6 Affirms BIA Finding on Failure to Show Exceptional Circumstance for Missed Hearing

CA6 affirmed BIA denial of motions to reopen, finding that even if petitioner’s motions were found to be timely, he would not be entitled to relief because he has not shown that he missed his hearing due to exceptional circumstances. (Acquaah v. Holder, 12/18/09).

12/18/09 AILA Doc. No. 10021774. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 on Selective Enforcement Based on National Origin, Race, or Religion

The court affirmed the order partially dismissing the complaint where there was no clearly established equal protection right to be free of selective enforcement of immigration laws at the time of detention. (Turkmen v. Ashcroft, 12/18/09)

12/18/09 AILA Doc. No. 10012566. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE Issues New Procedures for Asylum Seekers Seeking Release From Detention

On December 16, 2009, ICE announced plans to release arriving aliens who have a credible fear of persecution or torture and are currently detained. The new policy will go into effect January 4, 2010. A Fact Sheet follows the News Release.

12/17/09 AILA Doc. No. 09121761. Asylum, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Liaison Minutes

NBC Liaison Committee Practice Tip: Filing for EAD When in Proceedings

AILA’s NBC Liaison committee provides a practice tip on what documents are acceptable as proof that an I-485 is pending before an immigration judge when applying for an EAD with NBC. AILA Doc. No. 09121560.

12/15/09 AILA Doc. No. 09121560. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

USCIS Fact Sheet on Processing Applications of Widow(er)s of Deceased U.S. Citizens

USCIS issued a fact sheet on the processing of applications of widow(er)s of deceased U.S. citizens. The fact sheet includes a list of questions and answers on issues including filing, employment authorization, children and removal proceedings.