Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
CA9 Adopts BIA’s Test for Determining Whether an Individual Has Effectuated an “Entry” Under Pre-IIRIRA Law
CA9 held that no entry was effectuated under former INA § 101(a)(13) when petitioner was detained before exiting the secondary inspection area (Sidhu v. Ashcroft, 5/27/04); and when INS failed to promptly issue a parole extension (Mariscal-Sandoval v. Ashcroft, 5/28/04)
CA9 Denies Motion for Stay of Voluntary Departure Period Filed After Expiration of Such Period
The Court reiterated that a petition for review does not automatically stay the voluntary departure period, and found that a Motion to Stay filed after the period expired is essentially a request to extend or reinstate the period. (Garcia v. Ashcroft, 5/27/04)
CA2 Says St. Cyr Does Not Extend to Conviction After Trial
The court held that the Supreme Court's decision in INS v. St. Cyr, that the repeal of §212(c) may not be applied retroactively to persons who pleaded guilty to deportable offenses, does not extend to persons convicted after trial. (Thom v. Ashcroft, 5/27/04)
CA11 Holds that Individuals Must Show Prejudice in MTRs Based on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
CA11 held that individuals who file motions to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel must demonstrate in their motion how their prior counsel’s actions (or inactions) prejudiced their removal proceeding. (Dakane v. US Attorney General, 5/25/04)
CA3 Finds No Jurisdiction to Extend or Reinstate Expired Voluntary Departure
The court found no jurisdiction to extend or reinstate a period of voluntary departure that expired during pendency of an appeal, but a motion to stay the voluntary departure period based on inherent equitable powers may still apply. (Reynoso-Lopez v. Ashcroft, 5/25/04)
CA7 Reveals Government Procedures for Notifying Local Immigration Officials of Stay Orders
Noting the government’s failure to properly convey notice of a stay order, CA7 discussed the government’s procedures for communicating such stay orders to the appropriate local immigration office, and cited CA9's email notification system was cited as a model. (Dimitrov v. Ashcroft, 5/24/04)
CA3 Holds False Tax Filing Is Not an Aggravated Felony
The court held that a conviction for filing false tax returns does not fall within INA §101(a)(43)(M)(i), reasoning that (M)(ii), which classifies tax evasion as an aggravated felony, would be superfluous if (M)(i) were construed to apply to tax offenses. (Ki Se Lee v. Ashcroft, 5/19/04)
EOIR FY2003 Statistical Year Book
EOIR FY2003 Statistical Year Book for the OCIJ, the BIA, and OCAHO, covering work during the past five years. The Year Book contains data and charts on, among other things, proceedings received and completed by type, disposition, and nationality.
Fairness in Immigration Litigation Act
Senators Hatch (R-UT), Kyl (R-AZ), Chambliss (R-GA) and Cornyn (R-TX) on 5/19/04 introduced the Fairness in Immigration Litigation Act, which claims to “restore fairness to the immigration litigation process and integrity to our immigration system.” AILA opposes as a broad attack on judicial review.
CA8 Holds that It Lacks Authority to Review BIA Issuance of Affirmance Without Opinion
CA8 held it lacked jurisdiction to review the claim that the BIA improperly employed its Affirmance Without Opinion (AWO) procedure.(Ngure v. Ashcroft, 5/17/04)
CA5 Holds that Excessively High Bonds that Have the Effect of Preventing Release are Presumptively Unreasonable
CA5 held that a reasonable and “appropriate in the circumstances” bond is permissible under Zadvydas; and that a bond which prevents release because of inability to pay, resulting in potentially permanent detention, is presumptively unreasonable. (Shokeh v. Thompson, 5/10/04)
EOIR Chief Immigration Judge Defends Video Hearings
Chief Immigration Judge Michael Creppy defends the use of video hearings in response to a letter from Christina DeConcini of CLINIC.
CA3 Finds No Jurisdiction to Review Denial of I-751 Waiver
The court held that INA §242(a)(2)(B)(ii) barred jurisdiction to review the denial of an application for a waiver of the joint filing requirement for removal of conditions on permanent resident status under INA §216(c)(4). (Urena-Tavarez v. Ashcroft, 5/7/04)
USCIS Memo Addresses Deferred Action for U Nonimmigrant Applicants
A 5/6/04 memo from William Yates, USCIS Associate Director for Operations, regarding VSC authority to assess deferred action for aliens seeking U relief while in removal proceedings.
CA1 Rejects Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim
The court rejected Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim as inadequate where Petitioner’s affidavit did not adequately describe the scope of the attorney-client agreement. (Wang v. Ashcroft, 5/5/04)
CA7 Upholds IJ's Instruction to Unprepared Counsel to Proceed on Relief Applications
The Court held that the phrasing of counsel's Motion to Expedite Hearing was the cause of any confusion regarding what would be heard at the expedited hearing, and thus there was no due process violation in the IJ's insistence on proceeding.(Kuschchak v. Ashcroft, 5/3/04)
CA9 Rejects Government's Arguments on Exception to Zadvydas' Indefinite Detention Bar
CA9 rejected the govt's argument of an exception to Zadvydas' 6-month limitation on detention of post-final order permanent residents for particularly dangerous individuals where there are circumstances, such as mental illness, that help to create the danger. (Tuan Thai v. Ashcroft, 5/3/04)
This Week in Congress: May 3, 2004
This is an active week in Congress on immigration issues, with the introduction of a Democratic comprehensive immigration reform bill, and both the House and Senate Judiciary Committees reviewing issues of concern.
USCIS Manual on Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude
USCIS manual outlining issues related to crimes involving moral turpitude.
Better Data Needed to Ensure ICE Compliance with Zadvydas
Following a study of ICE's compliance with the Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas, the GAO recommends that ICE collect complete and accurate information to assure compliance, determine ICE deportation officer staffing needs, and provide guidance to deportation officers on prioritizing.
State Bar of Texas Meeting Minutes (4/30/04)
The 4/30/04 minutes from the last quarterly meeting of the State Bar of Texas, Committee on Laws Relating to Immigration & Nationality, address a variety of issues. The committee met with various directors and discussed current procedures, policies, staffing levels, and more.
CBP Memo Clarifying a 2002 “Zero Tolerance Policy” for Exercising Discretion
CBP 4/30/04 memo clarifying a 3/22/02 INS memo, “Zero Tolerance Policy” and reminding CBP directors that while discretion must be exercised consistent with homeland security concerns, appropriate and principled discretion should be exercised. Received through American Immigration Council FOIA.
EOIR Fact Sheet on the Immigration Court Process (Updated 4/28/05)
EOIR fact sheet addressing the immigration court process and outlining the types of immigration hearings, including removal, bond redetermination, relief from removal, asylum, expedited removal, CAT protection, and more.
CRS Report on Legislation on Immigration-Related Detention
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) report on the detention of noncitizens, including changes related to the creation of DHS, authority for detention, when mandatory detention is warranted, detention statistics, and legislation in the 108th Congress related to detention.
CA3 Holds Parolees Are Subject to INA §238(b)
Rejecting the argument that INA §238(b) should apply only to nonimmigrants, the court held that a parolee can be subject to administrative removal without a hearing. (Bamba v. Rile, 4/27/04)