Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
BIA Rules Respondent’s Conviction for Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud Constitutes a Particularly Serious Crime
BIA found the amount of forfeiture ordered in a criminal proceeding may be considered in determining if a crime of fraud or deceit resulted in a loss exceeding $10,000, if the amount ordered is sufficiently traceable to the conduct of conviction. Matter of F-R-A-, 28 I&N Dec. 460 (BIA 2022)
Practice Resource: Fraudulent Document Standard and Matter of O–M–O–
The Asylum & Refugee National Committee provides a practice resource, following the BIA’s recent holding that IJs may determine a document to be fraudulent without relying on forensic analysis or other expert testimony, on how practitioners should prepare to present evidence and prepare clients.
EOIR to Host ECAS Information Session
EOIR will host a virtual EOIR Courts & Appeals (ECAS) information session on February 8, 2022, from 1 pm to 2 pm (ET), in advance of ECAS becoming mandatory on February 11, 2022. Register by February 7, 2022, at 10 am (ET).
CA4 Finds That Guatemalan Petitioner Was Persecuted on Account of His Family Ties
The court held that the BIA erred in finding that the petitioner lacked a reasonable fear of persecution or torture, that the agency incorrectly applied the statutory nexus requirement, and that petitioner was persecuted on account of a protected ground. (Tomas-Ramos v. Garland, 2/2/22)
Four Years of Profound Change: Immigration Policy during the Trump Presidency
The Migration Policy Institute provides an overview of policies at different points during the Trump Administration, chronicling the immigration actions, large and small, that President Donald Trump and his Administration took from January 20, 2017, through January 20, 2021.
AILA, the American Immigration Council, and 147 Partners Send Letter to Biden on Funding for Legal Representation Programs
AILA, the American Immigration Council, and 147 partners sent a letter to Biden and Congress requesting an increase in funding to expand legal representation for people in removal proceedings.
CRS Provides Insight Report on Dreamers
CRS provided an Insight report on Dreamers. The report explains the options currently available to Dreamers once they reach age 21, estimates the population of “legal Dreamers,” and outlines selected congressional action that could affect "legal Dreamers.”
BIA Dismisses Appeal After Finding §714.1 of Iowa Code Is Divisible with Regard to Type of Theft
BIA found Iowa Code is divisible with respect to whether a violation of it involved theft by taking without consent or by fraud or deceit, permitting use of modified categorical approach to determine if a violation involved aggravated felony theft. Matter of Koat, 28 I&N Dec. 450 (BIA 2022)
CA8 Upholds BIA’s Decision Denying Motion to Reopen Even Though Petitioner Made a Prima Facie Case for Relief
The court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s successive motion to reopen, and that the BIA did not deprive the petitioner of a constitutionally protected liberty interest in declining to reopen proceedings sua sponte. (Urrutia Robles v. Garland, 1/26/22)
CA11 Finds Petitioner Failed to Prove That Florida’s Cocaine Statute Covers More Substances Than the Federal Statute
The court held that the petitioner, who had been convicted of cocaine possession under Florida law, had failed to show that Florida’s definition of cocaine covers more than its federal counterpart, and thus upheld the BIA’s denial of cancellation of removal. (Chamu v. Att’y Gen., 1/26/22)
CA5 Finds Proposed PSG of Honduran Women Unable to Leave Domestic Relationship Was Not Cognizable
The court concluded that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in holding that the petitioner’s proposed particular social group (PSG)— “Honduran women who are unable to leave their domestic relationships”—was not legally cognizable. (Jaco v. Garland, 10/27/21, amended 1/26/22)
CA9 Declines to Rehear Velasquez-Gaspar v. Garland En Banc
The court issued an order denying the rehearing en banc of Velasquez-Gaspar v. Garland, in which the court upheld the BIA’s conclusion that the Guatemalan government could have protected the petitioner had she reported her abuse. (Velasquez-Gaspar v. Garland, 1/25/22)
CA7 Says BIA Legally Erred by Considering Arguments That the Government First Raised on Appeal
The court held that the BIA legally erred by considering arguments that the government did not present to the IJ, and that the BIA engaged in impermissible factfinding on the conditions in Kosovo, rendering its decision to deny remand an abuse of discretion. (Osmani v. Garland, 1/24/22)
CA7 Upholds Asylum Denial to Christian Chinese Petitioner Who Acknowledged Discrepancies in Her Asylum Application
The court held that the record supported the IJ’s and BIA’s conclusion that the Chinese Christian petitioner did not meet her burden of establishing her eligibility for asylum given the discrepancies in her testimony and the lack of corroborative evidence. (Dai v. Garland, 1/24/22)
DHS Releases Privacy Impact Assessment for HSI Surveillance Technologies
ICE conducted a Privacy Impact Assessment of HSI’s use of several surveillance technologies, including body wire, video surveillance, and location tracking. These technologies are used by HSI to investigate human smuggling and trafficking and immigration fraud, among other crimes.
EOIR Invites Stakeholders to Online Screening of Model Hearing Program
As part of the Access EOIR initiative, EOIR invites stakeholders to an online viewing session of its Model Hearing Program event on February 3, 2022, from 2 pm to 4 pm (ET). The video will cover MHP, protection under CAT, and more. RSVP to EngagewithEOIR@usdoj.gov by February 2, 2022, at 5 pm.
CA9 Applies Circumstance-Specific Approach to Find That Amount of Marijuana in Petitioner’s Possession Exceeded 30 Grams
The court held that the circumstance-specific approach applies to the 30-gram limit of INA §237(a)(2)(B)(i)’s personal-use exception, and that the circumstances established that the amount of marijuana in petitioner’s possession exceeded 30 grams. (Bogle v. Garland, 6/23/21, amended 12/29/21)
AILA Submits Statement for Congressional Hearing on Immigration Courts
AILA submitted a statement entitled “Why America needs an Independent Immigration Court System” to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship for its hearing “For the Rule of Law, an Independent Immigration Court.”
BIA Reinstates Removal Proceedings After Finding §2C:35-10(a)(1) of New Jersey Statutes Annotated Is Divisible with Respect to Specific Substance Poss
BIA found §2C:35-10(a)(1) of New Jersey Statutes Annotated is divisible and convictions can be reviewed under the modified categorical approach to determine whether the specific substance possessed is a controlled substance under federal law. Matter of Laguerre, 28 I&N Dec. 437 (BIA 2022)
Multilingual Instructional Videos on Various Immigration Processes
Innovation Law Lab shares instructional videos in a variety of languages, including Central American indigenous languages, explaining different immigration processes. Videos cover topics such as the difference between ICE, ISAP, and the immigration court and what are biometrics, among other items.
BIA Denies Motions to Terminate and to Reopen and Rescind In Absentia Removal Order, Distinguishes Niz-Chavez
The BIA held that a respondent served with a noncompliant notice to appear receives sufficient written notice to support an in absentia removal order when properly served with a notice of hearing specifying the time and place of the hearing. Matter of Laparra, 28 I&N Dec. 425 (BIA 2022)
TRAC Reports on Immigration Court Backlog
TRAC released a report on the immigration court backlog, finding that pending cases at the end of December 2021 reached 1,596,193—the largest in history. The report includes information on quarterly increases in the backlog and recent accelerations in rate of growth.
CA1 Says Conviction in Rhode Island for Driving a Motor Vehicle Without Consent Is Not Categorically a Theft Offense
The court held that the petitioner’s conviction for driving a motor vehicle without consent of the owner or lessee under Rhode Island General Laws (RIGL) §31-9-1 did not constitute a categorical aggravated felony theft offense. (Da Graca v. Garland, 1/18/22)
CA5 Finds Petitioner Removable Under INA §237(a)(2)(A)(ii) for Having Been Convicted of Two CIMTs After Admission
The court concluded that res judicata did not bar the removal proceedings, deadly conduct was categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT), and petitioner was admitted to the United States when he adjusted to lawful permanent resident (LPR) status. (Diaz Esparza v. Garland, 1/17/22)
DHS Reports on Persons Enrolled in MPP in December 2021
DHS released a report on initial enforcement outcomes for persons enrolled in MPP from December 6, 2021, to December 31, 2021. The report includes information on fear screenings, returns and disenrollements, non-refoulement interviews, and more.