Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
EOIR Announces Dedicated Docket Process for More Expeditious Immigration Hearings
EOIR issued a memo establishing a dedicated docket to certain individuals in removal proceedings with a focus on the adjudication of family cases as designated by DHS.
CA4 Holds That IJs Have a Duty to Develop the Record in Immigration Court Proceedings
The court held that IJs have a legal duty to fully develop the record—a duty which becomes particularly important in pro se cases, and which extends to proceedings in which noncitizens articulate a proposed particular social group (PSG). (Arevalo Quintero v. Garland, 5/26/21)
CA9 Affirms Denial of Deferral of Removal to Jamaican Petitioner Who Claimed She Suffered Physical Abuse by Former Domestic Partner
Upholding the BIA’s denial of deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), the court held that the record did not compel a finding that it was more likely than not that the petitioner would suffer future torture if she returned to Jamaica. (Dawson v. Garland, 5/26/21)
AILA and Partners Urge DHS to Stop Detentions and Transfers as COVID-19 Cases Spread in ICE Custody
AILA joined Immigration Justice Campaign Local Partner, the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network (RMIAN), in urging DHS to suspend the practice of detaining and transferring immigrants as COVID-19 cases in ICE custody trend upward.
Former Immigration Judges Ask AG Garland to Review and Rescind Prior AG Certifications
The Roundtable of Former Immigration Judges sent a letter to AG Garland urging him to review and rescind AG decisions issued under the Trump administration, noting that "the vast majority of those decisions overturned decades of substantive and procedural immigration law and policy."
Supreme Court Rules That Each of INA §276(d)’s Statutory Requirements Is Mandatory
The U.S. Supreme Court held that each of INA §276(d)’s statutory requirements for bringing a collateral attack on a prior removal order is mandatory, and that the respondent was not excused from making the first two showings set forth in §276(d). (United States v. Palomar-Santiago, 5/24/21)
CA1 Upholds Denial of Cancellation of Removal to Ecuadorian Petitioner with Two Young Children
The court held that the BIA did not err when it found that the petitioner, who had a 12-year-old son and a five-year-old daughter, had not met his burden to show that his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his family. (Tacuri-Tacuri v. Garland, 5/24/21)
AILA and Partners Send Letter Requesting DOJ and EOIR to Repeal the EOIR Fee Rule
AILA and partners sent a letter requesting DOJ and EOIR to repeal the EOIR fee rule that imposes draconian fee increases for critical immigration filings, and to ensure that any further rulemaking involving fees in EOIR proceedings does not deny due process or access to asylum to any person.
Presidential Memorandum on Restoring DOJ’s Access-to-Justice Function and Reinvigorating the White House Legal Aid Interagency Roundtable
On 5/18/21, President Biden issued a memorandum directing the Attorney General to “consider expanding DOJ’s planning, development, and coordination of access-to-justice policy initiatives,” and reinvigorating the White House Legal Aid Interagency Roundtable (LAIR). (86 FR 27793, 5/21/21)
ICE to Close Two Detention Centers in Massachusetts and Georgia
DHS Secretary Mayorkas directed ICE to discontinue use of the C. Carlos Carreiro Immigration Detention Center in North Dartmouth, Massachusetts. The secretary also instructed the ICE acting director to prepare to discontinue use of the Irwin County Detention Center in Ocilla, Georgia.
AILA Urges Further Shift Away from Detention as DHS Announces End to Contracts with Two Facilities
AILA welcomes news that ICE will end contracts with two detention facilities in Irwin County and Bristol County, but urges the Biden administration to take further action by conducting a full review of all people currently held in ICE custody and expanding community-based case management programs.
CA5 Says Conviction for Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering Is an Aggravated Felony Under INA §101(a)(43)(D)
The court held that the petitioner’s conviction for conspiracy to commit money laundering plainly constituted an aggravated felony under INA §101(a)(43)(D), and that the remainder of the petitioner’s claims were either meritless or unexhausted. (Maniar v. Garland, 5/20/21)
CA3 Rejects Government’s Attempt to Invoke Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine, But Upholds Denial of Withholding of Removal
The court held that the government’s evidence of petitioner’s fugitive status was insufficiently probative to justify discretionary dismissal of his petition, but found that BIA did not err in denying petitioner’s withholding of removal application. (Galeas Figueroa v. Att’y Gen., 5/19/21)
AILA and Partners Urge DOJ to Review EOIR Personnel and Install New Leadership
AILA and partners sent a letter urging DOJ to conduct a review of all EOIR personnel decisions made by the previous administration, immediately install new leadership in all key posts, and to diversify the immigration judge corps.
AILA Welcomes Biden Administration Expansion of Access to Justice and Legal Representation
AILA welcomed news that President Biden will renew DOJ's efforts to expand access to justice and legal representation, noting that, “Having legal representation is the most important factor in ensuring fair and just proceedings.”
EOIR Releases Workload and Adjudication Statistics
EOIR released workload adjudication statistics, including statistics on caseload, credible fear, reasonable fear, and asylum rates, detention time frames, in absentia orders, IJ corps, motions, representation rates, UAC, VTC hearings, hearing language, FOIA receipts, OCAHO receipts, and BIA appeals.
Attorney General Issues Memo on Access to Justice
Attorney General Garland issued a memo reinvigorating DOJ's Office for Access to Justice and announcing a process to develop a plan for expanding DOJ's role in leading access-to-justice policy initiatives, including on how DOJ and partners can address barriers to access in the immigration systems.
DHS OIG Finds ICE Did Not Consistently Provide Separated Migrant Parents the Opportunity to Bring Their Children Upon Removal
DHS OIG found that before 7/12/18, migrant parents were not consistently able to reunify with their children before removal, and that, in contradiction to claims by DHS and ICE, there was no policy or process requiring ICE officers to ascertain or honor parents’ decisions regarding their children.
CA9 Finds Nunc Pro Tunc Order Did Not Retroactively Establish Naturalized Parent’s Sole Legal Custody Under Former INA §321(a)
The court held that where it has not been proven that a custody order was entered in error, a nunc pro tunc order cannot retroactively establish a naturalized parent’s sole legal custody for purposes of derivative citizenship under former INA §321(a). (Padilla Carino v. Garland, 5/18/21)
AILA Submits Amicus Brief on “Totality of the Circumstances”
AILA submitted an amicus brief in Birhanu v. Garland arguing a totality of the circumstances approach and the Board’s prior PSC caselaw and urging the court to grant petitioner’s request for rehearing en banc.
OPLA Miami Scheduling - Attorney /Client Assignments (May 17 - June 11, 2021)
OPLA Miami scheduling for all non-detained from May 17 to June 11, 2021. These assignments were based upon dockets published by EOIR.
ICYMI: EOIR to Resume Hearings in Non-Detained Cases in Certain Immigration Courts
EOIR will resume non-detained individual and master calendar hearings in limited numbers at certain courts on 7/6/21. Those who don’t receive a notice of reset hearing by 6/22 should expect scheduled hearings to proceed in these courts. The option to file by email at these courts will end on 9/4.
EOIR Rescinds and Cancels Policy Memoranda 19-02 and 19-03
EOIR rescinded and canceled the following policy memoranda: PM 19-02, Guidelines Regarding New Regulations Governing Asylum and Protection Claims, and PM 19-03, Guidelines Regarding the Presidential Proclamation Addressing Mass Migration Through the Southern Border of the United States.
EOIR Cancels PM 19-12 on Guidelines for Adjudicating Asylum and Protection Claims
EOIR rescinded and canceled PM 19-12, Guidance Regarding New Regulations Governing Asylum and Protection Claims. Per EOIR, the revocation is consistent with existing court orders and Executive Order 14010 of February 2, 2021.
EOIR Cancels PM 20-04 on the Implementation of Asylum Cooperative Agreements
EOIR rescinded and canceled PM 20-04, Guidelines Regarding New Regulations Providing for the Implementation of Asylum Cooperative Agreements. Per EOIR, the revocation is consistent with Executive Order 14010 and the suspension and forthcoming termination of the Asylum Cooperative Agreements.