Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
TRAC Finds Lawsuits Challenging Confinement of Noncitizens Increasing
TRAC found that habeas corpus filings in federal courts challenging the confinement of noncitizens continue to rise. The latest available data show that during August 2018 the government reported 174 new habeas corpus civil filings by noncitizens. This is up 27.9 percent over the previous month.
AILA Quicktake #251: Attorney General's Decision in Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-
AILA's Associate Director of Government Relations Kate Voigt discusses the Attorney General's decision in Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, which limits the ability of immigration judges to terminate cases. Join fellow AILA members in signing a petition calling for independent immigration courts.
Attorney General’s Concerted Effort to Strip Immigration Judges of Judicial Independence Continues
In response to the AG's decision in Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, which will prevent judges from terminating a case except in exceptionally narrow circumstances and waste the court's time and resources, AILA again called on Congress to create an independent Article I immigration court.
CRS Publishes Report on the Legal Framework of Expedited Removal of Noncitizens
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) published a report on the expedited removal of noncitizens and its legal framework.
CA9 Remands, Holds Prima Facie Case Made to Exclude Evidence and Terminate Removal Proceedings Due to Egregious Violation of 8 CFR 287.8(b)(2)
The court found I-213 excludable because Coast Guard racially profiled and detained petitioner with no reasonable suspicion; confirmed prima facie case for termination without prejudice because violation predated any hearing, rendering new hearing insufficient. (Sanchez v. Sessions, 9/19/18)
CA9 Orders En Banc Rehearing of C.J.L.G. v. Sessions
The court ordered that C.J.L.G. v. Sessions, in which the three-judge panel found no categorical right to court-appointed counsel at government expense for minors in immigration proceedings, be reheard en banc. (C.J.L.G. v. Sessions, 9/19/18)
BIA Finds Returning LPR Was Not Seeking Admission Based on Pre-IIRIRA Conviction
Unpublished BIA decision holds that returning LPR was improperly regarded as applicant for admission based on pre-IIRIRA conviction and remands to consider whether trip abroad was innocent, casual, and brief. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Suero, 9/19/18)
CA6 Holds Petitioner Failed to Prove Lozada Claims and Rejects Argument that Ineffective Assistance Implicates Due Process
The court held it had no jurisdiction to review sham marriage determination; BIA was correct that Lozada challenge failed; and refused to link ineffective assistance to 5th Amendment due process violation. (Al-Saka v. Sessions, 9/18/18)
ICE Issues Statement to Senate Committee on Flores Settlement
ICE Executive Associate Director Matthew T. Albence issued a statement to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on reinterpretation of Flores settlement and its impact on family separation and “catch and release.”
GAO Statement on Progress and Challenges in the Management of Immigration Courts and Alternatives to Detention Program
The GAO issued a statement before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, addressing EOIR’s caseload and participation in and the cost of the ATD program and the extent to which ICE has measured the performance of the ATD program.
AG Refers Case to Himself Relating to Authority to Hold Bond Hearings
The Attorney General referred a BIA decision to himself for review of issues relating to the authority to hold bond hearings for certain individuals screened for expedited removal proceedings. Amicus briefs are due by 10/16/18. Matter of M-G-G-, 27 I&N Dec. 469 (A.G. 2018)
AG Issues Decisions in Accordance with Matter of Castro Tum
Consistent with Matter of Castro-Tum on dismissal or termination of removal proceedings, the Attorney General issued decisions in two related cases. Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, 27 I&N Dec. 462 (A.G. 2018)
An Attorney’s Ethical and Legal Obligations to Pereira-Affected Clients
Identify the ethical obligations counsel must consider when advising clients in relation to Pereira. By following ethical parameters, attorneys and clients can properly arrive at the best strategic decision for that client’s case and take the action that the informed client decides is best.
HHS Notice of Intent to Fund 3,800 Additional Beds to Keep Unaccompanied Children in Custody
HHS (Department of Health and Human Services) notice of intent to provide up to $367,860,381 of funding for 3,800 beds to keep unaccompanied children in custody. (83 FR 47176, 9/18/18)
BIA Holds Colorado Theft Statute Not an Aggravated Felony
Unpublished BIA decision holds that theft under Colo. Rev. Stat. 18-4-401(1) is not an aggravated felony because it applies to the acquisition of property with consent that was obtained through deception. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Garay-Gomez, 9/18/18)
AILA and Council Issue Statement to Senate HSGAC Committee on Flores Settlement Agreement
AILA and American Immigration Council statement submitted to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) addressing recently proposed regulations that would undermine the 1997 Flores Settlement Agreement.
Sign-On Letter Opposing Legislation That Would Expand Family Detention
On 9/14/18, AILA joined national and state/local organizations to urge the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to reject any legislation that would expand the scale and length of immigrant family detention.
CA5 Upholds BIA Denial of MTR for Original Removal Now Amenable to Cancellation, Based on §241(a)(5)
The court held that although petitioner’s original removal grounds no longer trigger removability, and he could have challenged it from abroad, his unlawful reentry and its consequent application of §241(a)(5) deprive BIA authority to reopen. (Rodriguez-Saragosa v. Sessions, 9/14/18)
CA9 Grants in Part, Remanding Reasonable Fear Review MTR for Sua Sponte Consideration; Denies in Part, Affirming IJ/AO Negative Reasonable Fear Determ
The court held substantial evidence did not compel a conclusion that IJ erred by not specifically addressing all evidence in reasonable fear review, which are statutorily abbreviated, yet IJ abused his discretion by denying jurisdiction to reopen proceedings. (Bartolome v. Sessions, 9/14/18)
BIA Finds Texas Unlawful Restraint Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds that attempted unlawful restraint under Tex. Penal Code § 20.02(c)(1) not a CIMT because persons could be convicted for seeking to assume lawful control of their own child with the acquiescence of the victim. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of S-K-, 9/14/18)
Congressional Letter Requesting Information Regarding Initiative to Recalendar Administratively Closed Cases
A 9/13/18 letter from Senator Cortez Masto and others expressing concerns about ICE plans to recalendar potentially hundreds of thousands of administratively closed cases following the Attorney General’s decision in Matter of Castro-Tum, and requesting information on the initiative.
BIA Finds Non-Aggravated Felony Drug Offense Not a Presumptive Particularly Serious Crime
Unpublished BIA decision holds that possession with intent to distribute marijuana under Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law 5-602 is not a presumptive particularly serious crime because it is not an aggravated felony. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of J-F-B-, 9/13/18)
ABA Issues Statement Regarding Immigration Lawyers and Judges
In response to a speech by Attorney General Sessions, ABA President Bob Carlson issued a statement in support of immigration lawyers and judges, stating that the ABA strongly supports the independence of immigration judges and immigration courts and applauds the work of immigration lawyers.
BIA Dismisses Respondent’s Appeal and Defines “Obstruction of Justice”
The BIA found that the respondent’s conviction for accessory to a felony is categorically an aggravated felony offense relating to obstruction of justice that renders him removable under INA §237(a)(2)(A)(iii). Matter of Valenzuela Gallardo, 27 I&N Dec. 449 (BIA 2018)
AILA Quicktake #250: Proposed Changes to Flores Settlement Agreement
AILA's Associate Director of Government Relations Kate Voigt discusses the proposed changes to the Flores Settlement Agreement and their possible impact on the detention of immigrant children.