Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
CA6 Holds Petitioner Failed to Prove Lozada Claims and Rejects Argument that Ineffective Assistance Implicates Due Process
The court held it had no jurisdiction to review sham marriage determination; BIA was correct that Lozada challenge failed; and refused to link ineffective assistance to 5th Amendment due process violation. (Al-Saka v. Sessions, 9/18/18)
ICE Issues Statement to Senate Committee on Flores Settlement
ICE Executive Associate Director Matthew T. Albence issued a statement to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on reinterpretation of Flores settlement and its impact on family separation and “catch and release.”
GAO Statement on Progress and Challenges in the Management of Immigration Courts and Alternatives to Detention Program
The GAO issued a statement before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, addressing EOIR’s caseload and participation in and the cost of the ATD program and the extent to which ICE has measured the performance of the ATD program.
AG Refers Case to Himself Relating to Authority to Hold Bond Hearings
The Attorney General referred a BIA decision to himself for review of issues relating to the authority to hold bond hearings for certain individuals screened for expedited removal proceedings. Amicus briefs are due by 10/16/18. Matter of M-G-G-, 27 I&N Dec. 469 (A.G. 2018)
AG Issues Decisions in Accordance with Matter of Castro Tum
Consistent with Matter of Castro-Tum on dismissal or termination of removal proceedings, the Attorney General issued decisions in two related cases. Matter of S-O-G- & F-D-B-, 27 I&N Dec. 462 (A.G. 2018)
An Attorney’s Ethical and Legal Obligations to Pereira-Affected Clients
Identify the ethical obligations counsel must consider when advising clients in relation to Pereira. By following ethical parameters, attorneys and clients can properly arrive at the best strategic decision for that client’s case and take the action that the informed client decides is best.
HHS Notice of Intent to Fund 3,800 Additional Beds to Keep Unaccompanied Children in Custody
HHS (Department of Health and Human Services) notice of intent to provide up to $367,860,381 of funding for 3,800 beds to keep unaccompanied children in custody. (83 FR 47176, 9/18/18)
AILA and Council Issue Statement to Senate HSGAC Committee on Flores Settlement Agreement
AILA and American Immigration Council statement submitted to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) addressing recently proposed regulations that would undermine the 1997 Flores Settlement Agreement.
BIA Finds Texas Unlawful Restraint Not a CIMT
Unpublished BIA decision holds that attempted unlawful restraint under Tex. Penal Code § 20.02(c)(1) not a CIMT because persons could be convicted for seeking to assume lawful control of their own child with the acquiescence of the victim. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of S-K-, 9/14/18)
Sign-On Letter Opposing Legislation That Would Expand Family Detention
On 9/14/18, AILA joined national and state/local organizations to urge the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to reject any legislation that would expand the scale and length of immigrant family detention.
CA5 Upholds BIA Denial of MTR for Original Removal Now Amenable to Cancellation, Based on §241(a)(5)
The court held that although petitioner’s original removal grounds no longer trigger removability, and he could have challenged it from abroad, his unlawful reentry and its consequent application of §241(a)(5) deprive BIA authority to reopen. (Rodriguez-Saragosa v. Sessions, 9/14/18)
CA9 Grants in Part, Remanding Reasonable Fear Review MTR for Sua Sponte Consideration; Denies in Part, Affirming IJ/AO Negative Reasonable Fear Determ
The court held substantial evidence did not compel a conclusion that IJ erred by not specifically addressing all evidence in reasonable fear review, which are statutorily abbreviated, yet IJ abused his discretion by denying jurisdiction to reopen proceedings. (Bartolome v. Sessions, 9/14/18)
BIA Finds Non-Aggravated Felony Drug Offense Not a Presumptive Particularly Serious Crime
Unpublished BIA decision holds that possession with intent to distribute marijuana under Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law 5-602 is not a presumptive particularly serious crime because it is not an aggravated felony. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of J-F-B-, 9/13/18)
Congressional Letter Requesting Information Regarding Initiative to Recalendar Administratively Closed Cases
A 9/13/18 letter from Senator Cortez Masto and others expressing concerns about ICE plans to recalendar potentially hundreds of thousands of administratively closed cases following the Attorney General’s decision in Matter of Castro-Tum, and requesting information on the initiative.
BIA Equitably Tolls MTR Deadline Due to Intervening Circuit Precedent
Unpublished BIA decision finds respondent exercised diligence in seeking reopening where motion to reopen was filed one month after he learned of intervening circuit court decision that was nine months before. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Gonzalez Hernandez, 9/11/18)
ABA Issues Statement Regarding Immigration Lawyers and Judges
In response to a speech by Attorney General Sessions, ABA President Bob Carlson issued a statement in support of immigration lawyers and judges, stating that the ABA strongly supports the independence of immigration judges and immigration courts and applauds the work of immigration lawyers.
BIA Dismisses Respondent’s Appeal and Defines “Obstruction of Justice”
The BIA found that the respondent’s conviction for accessory to a felony is categorically an aggravated felony offense relating to obstruction of justice that renders him removable under INA §237(a)(2)(A)(iii). Matter of Valenzuela Gallardo, 27 I&N Dec. 449 (BIA 2018)
AILA Quicktake #250: Proposed Changes to Flores Settlement Agreement
AILA's Associate Director of Government Relations Kate Voigt discusses the proposed changes to the Flores Settlement Agreement and their possible impact on the detention of immigrant children.
CA9 Reverses BIA Controlled Substance Removability Determination, Holds Nevada Conspiracy and Drug Statutes Overbroad and Indivisible
The court held conspiracy statute lacks “overt act,” does not categorically match generic definition, and is indivisible per CA9 precedent; drug statute overbroad and indivisible—CA9 found alternatives of violation are means, not elements. (Villavicencio v. Sessions, 9/11/18)
DOJ Issues Policy Memorandum Amending Directive on Use and Monitoring of DOJ Computers and Computer Systems
DOJ issued Policy memorandum #2018-02, which cancels certain sections of the 11/30/10 DOJ Order 2740.1A, Use and Monitoring of DOJ Computers and Computer Systems, and substitutes them with new language that is now the mandated policy under DOJ Order 2740.1A.
Attorney General Delivers Remarks to New Class of Immigration Judges
Attorney General Jeff Sessions delivered remarks to an incoming class of 44 immigration judges in Falls Church, Virginia. In his remarks he accused “good lawyers” of using their talents and skills “to get around the plain words of the INA,” and spoke about asylum, the border, and other topics.
AG Sessions’ Remarks Emphasize Need for Independent Immigration Courts
AILA responds to remarks delivered by Attorney General Jeff Sessions to a group of 44 new immigration judges.
DHS/HHS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Flores Settlement Agreement
DHS/HHS notice of proposed rulemaking to amend regulations related to the apprehension, processing, care, custody, and release of undocumented juveniles and would terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement. Comments are due by 11/6/18. (83 FR 45486, 9/7/18)
AILA, Others File Amicus Brief Arguing Term “Crime Involving Moral Turpitude” Unconstitutionally Vague
AILA, along with several other organizations, filed an amicus brief with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Martinez-De Ryan v. Sessions arguing that the term “crime involving moral turpitude” is unconstitutionally vague.
The Council Provides Practice Advisory on Motions for a Continuance
The American Immigration Council provided a practice advisory with an overview of motions to continue a case in removal proceedings, from the basics of making a continuance motion to jurisdictional bars to appellate review of continuances, as well as strategies in light of Matter of L-A-B-R-.