Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
EOIR Releases Training on Evidentiary Challenges
Obtained via FOIA by Hoppock Law Firm, EOIR released a training from the 2018 Legal Training Program on evidentiary challenges; assessing admissibility, weight, and reliability of evidence; and challenges to reliability of government interviews and reports. Special thanks to Matthew Hoppock.
EOIR Releases Training Materials on Developments in Criminal Immigration and Bond Law
Obtained via FOIA by Hoppock Law Firm, EOIR released a 2018 Legal Training Program presentation on developments in criminal immigration and bond law and avoiding the use or mitigating the effect of the categorical approach. Special thanks to Matthew Hoppock.
CA9 Declines to Review BIA’s Denial of Asylum and Withholding
The court denied a petition for review, finding substantial evidence supported BIA’s finding that applicant’s testimony was not persuasive, and that he failed to provide any meaningful corroborative evidence, despite receiving sufficient notice of the need to do so. (Liu v. Sessions, 6/1/18)
ICE Releases Statement on New York’s Detainer Policy
ICE released a statement after conducting a three-month review of detainers lodged with the New York City Police Department and the New York Department of Corrections. ICE purported to find that it prepared 440 detainers and nearly 40 individuals who were released from custody, reoffended.
AILA Policy Brief: New Barriers at the Border Impede Due Process and Access to Asylum
AILA issued a policy brief explaining recent policy changes that have eroded the due process rights of asylum seekers and other migrants at ports of entry and in border regions.
Vindicating the Rights of at the Border and Beyond: A Guide to Representing Asylum Seekers in Expedited Removal and Reinstatement of Removal Proceedin
The Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project at the Urban Justice Center provided a guide to assist those working with individuals who crossed the U.S.-Mexico border seeking asylum. This guide is limited to the civil immigration proceedings including expedited removal and reinstatement of removal.
CA7 Affirms Reinstatement of Prior Removal Order After Illegal Reentry
The court denied petition for review, rejecting the argument that, because reentry by previously removed LPR was “procedurally regular,” he was entitled to a full hearing before an IJ rather than be subject to reinstatement of prior removal order. (Mendoza v. Sessions, 5/31/18)
USCIS Provides Data on Active DACA Recipients as of May 31, 2018
USCIS provided data on active DACA recipients as of May 31, 2018, by country of birth, by state or territory of residence, by core based statistical area, by gender, by age, and by marital status.
USCIS Provides Approximate Number of Active DACA Recipients as of May 31, 2018
USCIS provided data on the approximate number of active DACA recipients, broken by month and year of their current DACA expiration date, as of May 31, 2018.
USCIS Provides Data on Pending DACA Applications as of May 31, 2018
USCIS provided data on the approximate number of DACA renewals pending with expired DACA and the approximate number of DACA initial applications pending, as of May 31, 2018.
CA1 Finds No Jurisdiction to Review Denial of Claim for Deferral of Removal
The court denied the petition for review, finding that the petitioner did not show that the record compels the conclusion that he is entitled to deferral of removal and that evidence of official acquiescence in torture was too speculative. (Morris v. Sessions, 5/30/18)
EOIR Released Memo on Staff Availability for Detail Travel
Aura Bogado, reporter for Reveal, obtained an EOIR memo that states that all personnel must sign up for three, two-week detail periods, between 7/7/18 and 1/5/19. This is being done, “in an effort to ensure that all immigration courts are appropriately staffed at all times."
CA9 Granted Petition for Rehearing in Case on “Crime of Domestic Violence” Under INA §237(a)(2)(E)
The court granted the petitioner’s petition for panel rehearing and the opinion filed on 9/14/17, which held that Arizona Revised Statutes §13-1203(A)(1) is a crime of violence under 18 USC §16(a), was withdrawn. (Cornejo-Villagrana v. Sessions, 5/30/18)
EOIR Releases Training Materials on the One-Year Bar and One Central Reason Standard in Asylum Law
Obtained via FOIA by Hoppock Law Firm, EOIR released a 2018 Legal Training Program presentation on the one-year bar and one central reason standard in asylum law. Special thanks to Matthew Hoppock.
CA2 Holds IJ Gave Undue Weight to Asylum Seekers’ Omission of Facts
The court granted petitions for review, after finding that IJs and the BIA erred by substantially relying on the fact that applicants for asylum and related relief testified during removal proceedings to certain details not included in their initial applications. (Gao v. Sessions, 5/25/18)
USCIS Provides Data on Characteristics of DACA Requestors
In response to a 1/16/18 letter from Rep. Steve King (R-IA), USCIS provided data on characteristics of DACA requestors, including their age, education level, country of birth, and criminal history, among other characteristics.
CA8 Finds Violation of Municipal Ordinance Was “Conviction”
The court found the BIA properly denied TPS for conviction of two misdemeanors, adding that it is irrelevant whether state law classifies crimes as “infractions” or “violations,” so long as punishment imposable under state law meets definition of misdemeanor. (Rubio v. Sessions, 5/25/18)
CA7 Rejects Business Owners’ Proffered Social Group
The court denied the petitions for review finding the asylum claims were properly denied and upholding IJ reasoning regarding business owners in the Ukraine. (Melnik v. Sessions, 5/25/18)
CA4 Upheld Removability of LPR Under §237(a)(2)(A)(ii) and (iii)
The court held that the petitioner’s 1995 conviction for unlawful possession of marijuana with intent to manufacture, deliver, or sell constitutes a conviction of both an aggravated felony and a CIMT. (Guevara-Solorzano v. Sessions, 5/24/18)
Deporting Protected Immigrants Won’t Make America Great
AILA member Matthew Weisner describes the impact that ending Temporary Protected Status for Hondurans will have on those with TPS as well as the families, businesses, and communities that rely on them; he urges Congress to pass legislation to give long-term TPS holders a path to permanent residency.
CA1 Rules that BIA Erred in Failing to Analyze Past Persecution Under Childhood Standard
The court vacated the BIA’s order dismissing the petitioner’s appeal and remanded, finding that because the Ecuadorian asylum applicant was a minor at time of mistreatment, IJ and BIA should have taken a child-specific analysis. (Santos-Guaman v. Sessions, 5/23/18)
Harris, Feinstein, Colleagues Call on Sessions to Uphold Protections for LGBTQ Asylum Seekers Fleeing Persecution
On 5/23/18, U.S. Senators Kamala D. Harris (D-CA) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) led a group of their Senate colleagues in a letter to the Attorney General urging the DOJ to uphold Matter of A-B-, which provides protections for LGBTQ asylum seekers who are fleeing persecution.
ACLU Report on Neglect and Abuse of Unaccompanied Immigrant Children by CBP
ACLU and the University of Chicago International Human Rights Clinic issued a report based on documents from DHS’s CRCL office that alleges a series of instances of child abuse and neglect committed against unaccompanied minors held in CBP detention centers on the southern border.
CBP Response to ACLU Report on Abuses Against UACs
CBP issued a statement in response to ACLU’s report “Neglect and Abuse of Unaccompanied Immigrant Children by U.S. Customs and Border Protection,” claiming the allegations of serious child abuse and neglect against unaccompanied minors in CBP detention centers on the southern border are “unfounded.”
CA2 Holds that Petitioner With Stay of Removal Is Not Held Pursuant to INA §241
The court held that when a stay of removal has been issued by the circuit court, an immigrant is not held pursuant to INA §241 because they are not in the “removal period” contemplated by the statute until the appeal has been resolved. (Hechavarria v. Sessions, 5/16/18, amended 5/22/18)