Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
AILA Details Necessary Steps to Guarantee Due Process to Refugees and Asylum Seekers
In a statement highlighting the release of AILA’s new Due Process Denied report, AILA President Victor Nieblas Pradis noted, “The response thus far from the Obama Administration to the refugee situation in Central America has been abysmal...We can, and must, do better than this.”
AILA Quicktake #168: Due Process Denied
AILA's Director of Advocacy Greg Chen shares details from AILA's report on the due process violations Central Americans are experiencing as they seek protection in the United States.
Law Student Perspective: Supreme Court to Review Obama’s Executive Actions on Immigration
Lauren Berkowitz and AILA member Jonathan Grode discuss the impending U.S. Supreme Court decision in United States v. Texas, a politically charged case that raises important questions about the scope of the President’s authority to enforce U.S. immigration laws.
TRAC Report Finds Odds of Being Ordered Deported in Immigration Court Have Fallen
A TRAC report found that, so far in FY2016, the odds that a noncitizen will be ordered deported by an immigration judge have fallen to 42.4 percent, which is the lowest level since at least FY1998, according to the most recent data available from the Immigration Court.
CA3 Says Special Courts-Martial Convictions Constitute Aggravated Felonies Under the INA
The court dismissed the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction, finding that convictions by special courts-martial are convictions for purposes of INA §101(a)(48)(A), and that petitioner was removable for having committed an aggravated felony (Gourzong v. Att'y Gen., 6/14/16)
CA9 Grants Rehearing En Banc in Case Involving HIV-Positive Asylum Seeker from Mexico
The court granted rehearing en banc to revisit its prior decision upholding BIA's denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief to petitioner, a citizen of Mexico who had sought relief based on his sexual orientation and HIV-positive status. (Bringas-Rodriguez v. Lynch, 6/14/16)
BIA Finds EWI Not Inadmissible Due to Subsequent Parole From Within Country
Unpublished BIA decision holds that respondent who entered the country without inspection before being paroled to testify in criminal prosecution was not inadmissible under INA 212(a)(6)(A)(i) nor ineligible to adjust status under INA 245(a). Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Mora, 6/14/16)
BIA Says Respondent with PTSD Established Extraordinary Circumstances for Delay in Filing Asylum Application
Unpublished BIA decision finds that the IJ erred in concluding that respondent, whose PTSD was repeatedly triggered and exacerbated, did not demonstrate extraordinary circumstances sufficient to excuse the one-year asylum filing deadline. Courtesy of Ann Wennerstrom. (Matter of –, 6/14/16)
DHS CRCL FY2015 Annual Report to Congress
DHS CRCL FY2015 Annual Report to Congress detailing CRCL’s priorities and activities in FY2015, including preventing terrorism and enhancing security, securing and managing U.S. borders, and enforcing and administering U.S. immigration laws.
CA1 Upholds Denial of Chinese Asylum Applicants’ Second Motion to Reopen
The court denied the petition for review, concluding that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in holding that the petitioners failed to make an adequate showing of a material change in country circumstances, and thus that their second motion to reopen was time-barred. (Chen v. Lynch, 6/9/16)
BIA Finds There Is No Duress Exception to the “Material Support Bar”
The BIA held that the “material support bar” in INA §212(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VI) does not include an implied exception for a noncitizen who has provided material support to a terrorist organization under duress. Matter of M-H-Z-, 26 I&N Dec. 757 (BIA 2016)
BIA Solicits Amicus Briefs on Definition of “Minor” for Exception to One-Year Asylum Deadline
The BIA invites interested members of the public to file amicus curiae briefs on the definition of the term “minor” for purposes of establishing “extraordinary circumstances” that would constitute an exception to the one-year filing deadline for asylum applications. Briefs are due by 7/11/16.
CA3 Says PA Conviction for Making Terroristic Threats Is Categorically a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude
The court held that petitioner’s Pennsylvania conviction for making terroristic threats was categorically a crime of moral turpitude, because a threat communicated with a specific intent to terrorize is an act “accompanied by a vicious motive or a corrupt mind.” (Javier v. Att'y Gen, 6/9/16)
BIA Reverses Denial of Unopposed Motion to Terminate Based on Post-Conviction Relief
Unpublished BIA decision reverses denial of unopposed motion to terminate where both parties agreed that vacatur of criminal conviction was based on ineffective assistance of the respondent’s criminal attorney. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Palmer, 6/9/16)
CA5 Says BIA Failed to Consider All Relevant Evidence Concerning Whether Petitioner Received Notice
The court granted the petition for review and remanded, holding that because the BIA concluded that petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of notice without considering all relevant evidence, it abused its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. (Torres Hernandez v. Lynch, 6/8/16)
CA6 Says Jury Nullification Cannot Be Considered in Deciding Whether Petitioner Has Demonstrated Prejudice
The court held that jury nullification may not be considered when evaluating whether a petitioner has shown prejudice under the Strickland v. Washington test for ineffective assistance of counsel claims. (Lee v. United States, 6/8/16)
Senate Democrats Urge President to End the Deportation Raids
On 6/8/16, Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT) led 24 Senate Democrats in urging the President to end the deportation raids targeting Central American families and unaccompanied minors; and consider designating Guatemala, and re-designating El Salvador and Honduras for TPS.
CA8 Says Salvadoran Petitioner Failed to Show Nexus Between Membership in PSG and Persecution
The court denied the petition for review, holding that, assuming that petitioner’s proposed family-based groups are cognizable, particular social groups (PSGs), he failed to show a nexus between his membership in the groups and the persecution he suffered. (Aguinada-Lopez v. Lynch, 6/7/16)
CA3 Says Federal Regulation That Limits Adjustment of Status for K-4 Visa Holders Is Invalid
The court held that 8 CFR § 245.1(i), which effectively bars any child with a K-4 visa who was between the age of 18 and 21 at the time of his or her parent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen from adjusting status without first returning overseas, is invalid. (Cen v. Att'y Gen., 6/6/16)
CA8 Says Petitioner’s 2004 Arkansas Assault Conviction Is a CIMT
The court denied the petition for review, holding that the petitioner’s 2004 Arkansas conviction for assault in the first degree was categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). (Estrada-Rodriguez v. Lynch, 6/6/16)
BIA Reverses Denial of Continuance to Seek U Visa Certification
Unpublished BIA decision reverses denial of continuance to seek law enforcement certification necessary to apply for U visa where a crime occurred only two weeks prior to the hearing. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Patel, 6/3/16)
BIA Remands to Allow U Visa Derivative to Renew Request for a Continuance
Unpublished BIA decision applies Matter of Sanchez Sosa to U visa derivatives with respect to continuances in immigration court, and remands the record to the IJ for the respondent to renew his request for a continuance and administrative closure. Courtesy of Nicolas Chavez.
CA8 Finds BIA Did Not Abuse Its Discretion in Denying Motion to Reopen in Absentia Removal Order
The court upheld the denial of the petitioner’s motion to reopen the in absentia removal order entered against him, finding that the petitioner had failed to rebut the presumption that the Notice of Hearing mailed by DHS was delivered to him. (Diaz v. Lynch, 6/1/16)
DOJ OIL June 2016 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for June 2016, with articles on United States v. Texas and Mathis v. United States, as well as summaries of circuit court decisions for June 2016.
CA9 Finds Remand Not Justified Where ICE Reinstated Prior Expedited Removal Order Despite Intervening PD Memos
The court concluded that remand to ICE for reconsideration of its decision to reinstate the petitioner’s prior expedited removal order was not justified, despite intervening agency memoranda pertaining to the exercise of prosecutorial discretion (PD). (Morales de Soto v. Lynch, 5/31/16)