Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
AILA's Take on Family Detention
AILA calls on the Obama administration to stop the mass detention and rapid deportation of Central American mothers and children in this backgrounder document.
AILA's Take on Bond for Detained Families
AILA backgrounder on the Obama Administration’s decision to denying bond to all Central American families being detained.
House Briefing on Family Detention
A 9/22/14 AILA-sponsored briefing in the House on family detention.
ICE to Open Additional Facility in South Texas to House Adults with Children
ICE announcement that it plans to open and operate a new facility in early November in Dilley, Texas to detain adults with children in response to the influx of individuals apprehended along the Southwest border. Facility has capacity for 2,400 individuals.
ICE Shares Stories from Artesia Detention Facility Demonstrating Humanitarian Mission
ICE press release sharing the experiences ICE employees at the Family Residential Facility in Artesia. Stories included how a HSI special agent used his skills as an EMT to help a toddler experiencing a seizure and how agents and officers have been teaching children there American football.
EOIR to Close El Centro, California Immigration Court
EOIR announcement that it will close its El Centro Immigration Court in California on September 30, 2014, as a result of DHS’s decision to close this location as a primary place of detention for respondents in removal proceedings, and the new hearing location will be the Imperial Immigration Court.
AILA Quicktake #97: Deputy Secretary Mayorkas' Speech and Artesia Hearings
AILA's Director of Advocacy Greg Chen sits down to provide a recap on Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas' appearance at the National Press Club this week. Chen also discusses the immigration court proceedings happening for detainees in Artesia.
Letter to Vice President Biden on Pro Bono Representation
A 9/19/14 letter from AILA and other legal services organizations urging the Administration to take action to remove impediments to access to counsel for children and families.
BIA Holds IJ Should Have Reviewed Initial I-485
Unpublished BIA vacates denial of I-485 due lack of healthcare worker certification and instructs IJ to determine whether resubmitted I-485 should be treated as renewed application and whether a continued offer of employment exists. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Kim, 9/19/14)
AILA Amicus Brief Requesting BIA to Reexamine Adoption of Circumstance-Specific Methodology
AILA amicus brief to the BIA requesting the reexamination of its adoption of a circumstance-specific inquiry for the exception clause of the controlled substance ground of removability in light of Moncrieffe v. Holder and the continued validity of Matter of Davey.
CA9 Finds CHS §11351 Conviction Is Neither Aggravated Felony Nor Controlled Substance Offense (Withdrawn) (Updated 10/20/14)
The court vacated the removal order, applying the modified categorical approach and finding that the conviction under §11351 of the California Health and Safety Code (CHS) was neither an aggravated felony nor a controlled substance offense. (Medina v. Holder, 9/19/14; withdrawn 10/10/14)
CA3 Holds Pennsylvania Child Endangerment Conviction Is Not a CIMT
The court applied the categorical approach and held that the least culpable conduct criminalized under §4304(a)(1) of Pennsylvania’s child endangerment statute did not implicate a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). (Hernandez-Cruz v. Att'y Gen., 9/4/14)
CA11 Says Silence in DOS Reports Cannot Rebut Evidence of Torture of Returned Asylum Seekers
The court vacated and remanded the 2013 order of removal, concluding that the silence in the DOS Country Reports could not, without more, rebut evidence presented that petitioner would suffer persecution as a failed asylum seeker if returned to Sri Lanka. (Gaksakuman v. Att’y Gen., 9/18/14)
BIA Distinguishes Moncrieffe and Reaffirms Matter of Davey
The BIA held the exception in INA §237(a)(2)(B)(i) calls for a circumstance-specific inquiry into the character of the unlawful conduct on a single occasion, not a categorical inquiry into the elements of a single statutory crime. Matter of Dominguez-Rodriguez, 26 I&N Dec. 408 (BIA 2014)
BIA Says IJ Erred in Denying Continuance and Former Attorney Did Not Act Frivolously
Unpublished BIA decision remanding and permitting respondent to seek voluntary departure, holding IJ erred in denying request for a continuance, IJ did not err in denying administrative closure, and former attorney did not act frivolously in pursuing these requests. Courtesy of Jordan G. Forsythe.
BIA Says Aggravated Felony Bar Applies to Conditional Permanent Resident Admitted at POE
The BIA held an alien admitted at a port of entry (POE) as a conditional permanent resident pursuant to §216(a) is “lawfully admitted for permanent residence” and is barred from an §212(h) waiver, if he was later convicted of an aggravated felony. Matter of Paek, 26 I&N Dec. 403 (BIA 2014)
BIA Scolds Immigration Judge for Criticizing Attorney
Unpublished BIA decision criticizes IJ for accusing respondent’s attorney of filing frivolous motions for continuance or administrative closure and states that great care must be taken when suggesting an attorney’s conduct is unprofessional. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Perez, 9/17/14)
BIA Orders Further Evaluation of Respondent’s Mental Competency
Unpublished BIA decision grants motion to reopen filed by DHS and orders further assessment of respondent’s mental competency. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Davila, 9/17/14)
CA3 Holds Pennsylvania Reckless Endangerment Conviction Is Not a CIMT
The court granted the petition and vacated the removal order, applying the categorical approach and concluding that the least culpable conduct under §2705 of Pennsylvania’s reckless endangerment statute did not implicate a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT). (Mahn v. Att'y Gen., 9/17/14)
EOIR Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Custody and Bond Proceedings Representation
EOIR notice of proposed rulemaking to amend the regulations to allow a representative to enter an appearance in custody and bond proceedings without such an appearance constituting an entry of appearance for all Immigration Court proceedings. Comments are due by 11/17/14. (79 FR 55659, 9/17/14)
EOIR Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Pro Bono Legal Services Providers List
EOIR notice of proposed rulemaking to change the name of the “List of Free Legal Services Providers” and to enhance the eligibility requirements for organizations, private attorneys, and referral services to be included in the List. Comments are due by 11/17/14. (79 FR 55662, 9/17/14)
AILA Letter to Congress on Artesia
A 9/16/14 AILA letter to members of Congress urging action on the Artesia, NM family detention center.
AILA Letter to President Obama on Artesia
A 9/16/14 AILA letter to President Obama urging the closing of the Artesia, NM family detention center.
CA6 Dismisses Motion to Reopen for Lack of Jurisdiction
The court found it lacked jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of the petitioner’s second motion to reopen because of humanitarian factors, finding that the exercise of the BIA’s sua sponte authority was discretionary and not subject to judicial review. (Rais v. Holder, 9/16/14)
CA7 Holds Stop-Time Rule May Not Be Applied Retroactively
The court found that the stop-time rule of INA §240A(d)(1) would have an impermissible retroactive effect if it were applied to petitioner’s 1995 drug offense, and that he was eligible for cancellation since he accumulated the seven years of continuous residence. (Jeudy v. Holder, 9/15/14)