Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
Postville Raid: ICE Warrant and Affidavit
ICE submitted the following Application and Affidavit for a Search Warrant of the Postville Agriprocessors meat processing plant prior to the May 12 raid of the facility.
CA9 Discusses “Maximum Penalty Possible” Under the Petty Offense Exception
CA9 held that because the statutory maximum sentence for bribery of a public official was fifteen years, the petty offense exception did not apply despite the fact that the sentencing guideline range for the offense was zero to six months. (Mendez-Mendez v. Mukasey, 5/8/08)
CA2 Says IJ May Accept Late Filed Supporting Asylum Documents
The court held that where an asylum applicant has demonstrated good cause for failure to timely file documents and a likelihood of substantial prejudice, the IJ may depart from the deadline imposed by relevant local rules. (Dedji v. Mukasey, 5/8/08)
ICE Semiannual Report on Compliance With National Detention Standards
This report rates facilities by looking at the following issues: access to legal materials, telephone access, medical care, grievance procedures, transfer of detainees, religious practices, as well as other issues addressed in the national standards.
DHS Releases Medical Records Requests Forms
The following are the appropriate disclosure forms used for obtaining immigrant detainee medical records.
Orlando IJ Grants Asylum to Victim of Domestic Violence
An immigration judge for the Orlando, Florida Immigration Court finds that a victim of domestic violence merits a grant of asylum on humanitarian grounds. The social group is defined as “Honduran women in intimate relationships who are unable to leave the relationship.” Courtesy of John Ovink.
CA6 Finds “Personal Dispute” with UAE Prince Not Basis for Asylum
The court found substantial evidence supported the IJ’s conclusion that Petitioner was an angry investor, not a political dissident, when he confronted a United Arab Emirates Prince and called him a thief. (Zoarab v. Mukasey, 5/6/08)
CA9 Finds Record Compels Conclusion of Imputed Political Opinion Nexus
The court held that Petitioner demonstrated the facts necessary to prove an imputed political opinion claim and was thus eligible for asylum. (Silaya v. Mukasey, 5/6/08)
CA9 Finds Subjective Intent is Not Relevant to “Changed Circumstances”
The court held that there was no support for the IJ’s holding that Petitioner did not qualify for the changed circumstances exception to asylum filing deadline solely because his subjective intent to apply existed before the expiration of the one-year period. (Fakhry v. Mukasey, 5/5/08)
CA11 Finds No Jurisdiction to Review BIA’s Refusal to Reopen Sua Sponte
CA11 held that it lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal of BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen because the decision to reopen proceedings sua sponte is an action “committed to agency discretion by law” under the Administrative Procedure Act. (Lenis v. United States Att’y Gen., 5/5/08)
CA9 Upholds Denial of MTR Asylum Claim Based on Changed Circumstances
CA9 held that the BIA’s interpretation of INA §208(a)(2)(D) and §240(c)(7) in Matter of C-W-L- was reasonable, and found that Petitioner could apply for asylum only by filing a motion to reopen, subject to its limitations, despite a change in circumstances. (Chen v. Mukasey, 5/2/08)
CA3 Rejects Taylor/Shepard Approach in Determining Amount of Loss in Fraud Conviction
The court held that for purposes of the amount of loss under INA §101(a)(43)(M)(i), where a petitioner has not admitted to an amount in a plea, nor has a jury found an amount as part of a conviction, a court may inquire outside the record of conviction. (Nijhawan v. AG of the U.S., 5/2/08)
CA2 Remands, Finds Petitioner Did Not Waive His Right to Appeal
The court held that while accepting an IJ’s decision as final can serve as an effective waiver of appeal, the record did not support the conclusion that Petitioner or counsel understood the nature of the waiver. (Ali v. Mukasey, 5/2/08)
Iowa Defense Lawyers Given Government Manual
A Government "manual" was distributed to defense attorneys in Iowa who represented immigrant workers that were arrested in May 2008.
Text of “Detainee Basic Medical Care Act” (H.R. 5950)
On 5/1/08, Representative Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), introduced the “Detainee Basic Medical Care Act of 2008” (H.R. 5950), to require the DHS Secretary to establish procedures for the timely and effective delivery of medical and mental health care to all immigration detainees in custody.
Vera Institute’s Evaluation Report of EOIR’s Legal Orientation Program
EOIR released Vera Institute of Justice’s Evaluation, Performance and Outcome Measurement Report of the Legal Orientation Program, which seeks to provide individuals in removal proceedings information on forms of relief, how to represent themselves pro se, and how to obtain legal representation.
Immigration Law Today-May/June 2008
The May/June 2008 issue of Immigration Law Today focuses on asylum and relief, including the need for professional interpreters at asylum interviews, obtaining parole for asylum-seekers, and finding room for FGM relief.
Immigration Law Advisor, April 2008 (Vol. 2, No.4)
Immigration Law Advisor with an article on affording material support to a terrorist organization and the discretionary exemption to inadmissibility, federal court activity for March 2008, an article on immigration consequences of drug offenses, BIA precedent decisions, and a regulatory update.
CA7 Criticizes NIV Form DS-156; Allows Petitioner to Proceed With §212(d)(3) Waiver
Citing the “fatally flawed” Form DS-156 and the IJ's failure to advise Petitioner of all available avenues of relief, CA7 held that the BIA erred in finding Petitioner lost the opportunity to seek a waiver by not specifically requesting one in proceedings. (Atunnise v. Mukasey, 4/30/08)
CA9 Discusses Ineffective Assistance Rendered by Non-Attorney
The court held that knowing reliance upon the advice of a non-attorney cannot support a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel in removal proceedings. (Hernandez v. Mukasey, 4/30/08)
Stakeholder/USCIS Q & As 4/29/08 (Updated 7/2/08)
USCIS revised the answer to question #12 of the Q & As from the 4/29/08 Stakeholder meeting. The revised answer pertains to administratively closed I-730 applications.
CA1 Upholds Finding of No Past Persecution in Indonesian Withholding Claim
The court found that past persecution findings are “easily inferable” and in Petitioner’s case both the IJ and BIA discussed the past incidents and found they failed to justify the relief Petitioner requested. (Pulisir v. Mukasey, 4/29/08)
CA5 Holds Misprision of a Felony Necessarily Involves Fraud or Deceit
CA5 held that, because misprision of a felony under 18 USC §4 necessarily involves fraud or deceit, Petitioner, who did not dispute that the amount of loss resulting from his misprision conviction exceeded $10,000, was convicted of an aggravated felony. (Patel v. Mukasey, 4/29/08)
CA9 Finds Aiding and Abetting Assault with a Deadly Weapon is an Aggravated Felony
The court held that a person convicted of aiding and abetting an assault with a deadly weapon under Cal. Penal Code §245(a)(1) has committed a crime of violence, and thus an aggravated felony, as if he had personally committed the offense. (Ortiz-Magana v. Mukasey, 4/28/08)
CA6 Rejects Chinese Withholding and CAT Claims Based on U.S. Born Children
The court noted that children born outside of China are not counted for purposes of China’s population control policies and held that Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the evidence compelled a different conclusion. (Huang v. Mukasey, 4/25/08)