Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
EOIR Information Collection on Forms EOIR-42A and EOIR-42B
EOIR issued an information collection on Form EOIR-42A, Application for Cancellation of Removal for Certain Permanent Residents, and Form EOIR-42B, Adjustment of Status for Certain Nonpermanent Residents. Comments are due 12/22/08. (73 FR 70675, 11/21/08)
CA9 Denies Petition for Rehearing En Banc and Amends Opinion in Kalilu
CA9 denied the petition for rehearing en banc and made minor amendments to its earlier opinion on eligibility for adjustment of status. The court remanded the determination of a frivolous asylum application in light of Matter of Y-L-. (Kalilu v. Mukasey, 11/20/08)
CA11 Discusses What Rises to Persecution
CA11 found no jurisdiction to review untimely filed asylum applications. Being forced to pay for government-provided education, or evidence that activists with similar political views were arrested and detained, did not rise to the level of persecution. (Lei v. Attorney General, 11/20/08)
CA9 Holds Undisputed Admission of Entry Date Satisfies One-Year Deadline
Finding that it had jurisdiction to determine the timeliness of the asylum application as a question of law, CA9 held that a judicial admission of an entry date within one year of filing an asylum application was an undisputed fact. (Hakopian v. Mukasey, 11/19/08)
CA8 Upholds Finding of Improved Conditions in Mauritania; Rejects Asylum
CA8 held that significant discrepancies in the record and lack of evidence supported IJ’s adverse credibility determination. It upheld the IJ’s determination that improved conditions in Mauritania rebutted any presumption of a well-founded fear based on past harm. (Sow v. Mukasey, 11/19/08)
CA9 Overturns One-Year Deadline Denial in Iranian Asylum Case
The court found that it has jurisdiction to consider the timeliness of the asylum application because it was a mixed question of law and fact.(Khunaverdiants v. Mukasey, 11/18/08)
CA6 Upholds Negative Credibility Finding Based on Blatant Overstatement
The court noted that the failure to include every detail in an asylum application should not be fatal to an asylum claim, but held that blatant overstatement of the dangers in the Ivory Coast was sufficient to support a negative credibility determination. (Kaba v. Mukasey, 11/13/08)
CA2 Vacates Adverse Credibility and Persecutor Bar in Russian Claim
The court could not determine the basis for the adverse credibility determination and remanded. The court also held that substantial evidence did not support the persecutor bar. (Balachova v. Mukasey, 11/12/08)
CA10 Finds AG’s Interpretation of Statue to Allow Indefinite Detention Reasonable
CA10 vacates the habeas grant and remands, giving deference tothe AG’s reading of 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(6) as authorizing detention beyond 90 days of limited classes of aliens, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s earlier contrary interpretation. ((Hernandez-Carrera v. Carlson, 11/12/08)
CA9 Remands for Habeas Review of Citizenship Claim Prior to Final Order of Removal
The court reverses the district court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and remands, finding that the petitioner does not have to wait until a final removal order is issued before he can secure habeas review of his citizenship claim. (Flores-Torres v. Mukasey, 11/10/08)
CA10 Upholds MTR Asylum Denial Based on Change in Personal Circumstances
CA10 upheld the BIA finding of failure to present new evidence of changed conditions in China re coercive population control measures. It also held that a change in personal circumstances, a fourth pregnancy, could not support an untimely motion to reopen. (Wei v. Mukasey, 11/7/08)
AG Establishes Framework to Determine whether Conviction is CIMT
The Attorney General established analytical framework for deciding if a conviction is a CIMT, using the categorical approach, and if the inquiry remains unresolved, examines the record of conviction and then if necessary, additional evidence. Matter of Silva-Trevino, 24 I&N Dec. 687 (AG 2008)
AILA Liaison/NBC Q&As (11/06/08)
On 11/6/2008, NBC answered questions on the following issues:I-765 adjudication in proceedings; proof of admission by SAW applicants; change of address; lockbox issues with I-765s for individuals granted TPS in proceedings; and I-864 RFEs. AILA Doc. No. 09010665.
CA2 Finds Connecticut First Degree Larceny Is a CIMT
The court held that Connecticut first degree larceny for “defrauding a public community,” is a crime involving moral turpitude. (Mendez v. Mukasey, 11/6/08)
CA9 Finds Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1015(a) Does Not Require False Statement to be Material as an Element of the Offense
The court affirmed conviction concluding that 18 U.S.C. § 1015(a) does not require that false statements be “material” as an element of the offense. (United States of America v. Youssef, 11/5/08)
BIA Finds Asylum Filing Window Begins Upon Arrival from Most Recent Trip Abroad
The BIA held that for calculating the time between the arrival in the U.S. and the date when an asylum application was filed, the term “last arrival” should be interpreted literally to mean the alien’s most recent arrival from a trip abroad. Matter of F-P-R-, 24 I&N Dec. 681 (BIA 2008)
CA11 Denies Asylum to Eritrean Army Deserter Based on Lack of Credibility
The court held that the record did not compel a finding of past persecution because substantial evidence supported the IJ’s and BIA’s adverse credibility finding. (Mohammed v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 11/5/08)
CA10 Holds “Frivolous” Notice on Asylum Form Alone Complies with Statute
The court concluded as a matter of law that the written notice of the penalty for filing a frivolous asylum application contained on form complied with INA §208(d)(4)(A) and provided Petitioner with the notice he was entitled to. (Ribas v. Mukasey, 11/4/08)
ICE Issues Revised Information Collection on Immigration Bond Form
ICE issued a revised information collection and request for comment on Form I-352. Comments are due 1/2/08. (73 FR 65390, 11/3/08)
CA8 Finds Lari Ethnic Group to Be a Particular Social Group for Asylum
The court granted withholding, concluding that the Lari ethnic group of the Kongo tribe is a particular social group because members share a common dialect. (Malonga v. Mukasey, 11/3/08)
EOIR Responds to AILA Letter Regarding Immigration Court Practice Manual
The Office of Chief Immigration Judge at the Executive Office for Immigration Review replied to a September 10, 2008, letter that the AILA/EOIR Liaison Committee sent to EOIR outlining concerns with the Immigration Court Practice Manual.
Immigration Law Advisor, October 2008 (Vol. 2, No. 10)
mmigration Law Advisor with an article on criminal convictions in the immigration context, federal court activity for September 2008, an article on immigration in the October 2008 Supreme Court term, AG/BIA precedent decisions, and a regulatory update.
CA7 Upholds Frivolousness Finding in Pakistani Asylum Case
CA7 held that a finding of frivolousness is not an exercise of discretion and thus it has jurisdiction to review the agency’s finding. it upheld the frivolousness finding, noting that Petitioner knew his allegations of murder of his wife and son were false. (Siddique v. Mukasey, 10/31/08)
BIA Considers Due Diligence to Conclude Respondent Overcame Presumption of Delivery of NTA
The BIA held that respondent overcame the weaker presumption of delivery of NTA sent by regular mail under standards set forth in Matter of M-R-A-, noting that his due diligence in promptly seeking to redress the situation is significant. Matter of C-R-C-, 24 I&N Dec. 677 (BIA 2008)
BIA Addresses Overcoming Presumption of Delivery of Notices Sent by Regular Mail
The BIA held that the respondent provided sufficient evidence to overcome the presumption of delivery of a Notice of Hearing under the weaker standard applied when notices are delivered by regular mail. Matter of M-R-A-, 24 I&N Dec. 665 (BIA 2008)