Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
CA9 Finds Jurisdiction to Review Request to Reinstate Asylum Application
The Ninth Circuit, analogizing to motions to reopen, concluded that it has jurisdiction to review a request to reinstate an asylum application after it had been withdrawn in favor of an application for cancellation of removal that was denied. (Mendez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 8/20/03)
CA9 Finds Conviction for Making Terrorist Threats an Aggravated Felony
A conviction under California law for making terrorist threats was found to be a crime of violence constituting an aggravated felony. (Rosales-Rosales v. Ashcroft, 8/17/03)
Office of Detention and Removal Strategic Plan, 2003 - 2012
Endgame is the ICE Office of Detention and Removal multi-year strategic enforcement plan that serves as the basis for operational and budgetary plans until 2012 and will build the capacity to “remove all removable aliens” and eliminate the backlog of unexecuted final order removal cases.
EOIR OPPM 03-05: Scheduling Leave, Approval of Leave Requests, and Time and Attendance Reports for Court Personnel
EOIR issues Operating Policies and Procedure Memorandum (OPPM) 03-05: Scheduling Leave, Approval of Leave Requests, and Time and Attendance Reports for Court Personnel, which replaces OPPM 98-04, dated August 27, 1998.
AILA Issue Paper on Access to Counsel
AILA Issue Paper on access to counsel, including representation in immigration matters adjudicated at ports of entry and representation in the interior since 9/11.
BIA Denies Discretionary Relief for Breaching Protective Order
The BIA held that Respondent is ineligible for any relief except for bond, because a protective order was violated by disclosure of information to unauthorized persons and that there are reasonable grounds for regarding Respondent as a danger to U.S. security. (Matter of R-S-H-, 8/4/03)
CA9 Upholds BIA Streamlining Procedures
Court rejects due process challenge to BIA’s affirmance-without-opinion procedure. (Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 7/14/03)
DHS Implements "Operation Predator"
A recent DHS memo instructs DHS trial attorneys to "flag" cases in which an alien has been convicted of a criminal offense against children and to oppose bond, according to sources within the agency.
EOIR Announces New Local Operating Procedures for Buffalo & Batavia, NY
EOIR, on 7/1/03, posted to its website new local operating procedures for the Immigration Courts in Buffalo and Batavia, New York.
Ohio & Kentucky Immigration Court Case Files Moved to New Sites as of 7/1/03
EOIR, in a 6/23/03 News Release, announced that the administrative control of Immigration Court case files, including Records of Proceedings, for Ohio and Kentucky was transferred to new locations, effective 7/1/03.
EOIR Memo on Use of FedEx Delivery Services by Immigration Courts
EOIR Operating Policies and Procedures Memorandum (OPPM) 03-04, dated 7/9/03, provides guidance on the acceptable uses of FedEx Delivery Services by the immigration courts.
EOIR Updates List of Internal Agency Case-Tracking Codes
EOIR Operating Policies and Procedures Memorandum (OPPM) 03-03, dated 7/8/03, revises and adds to the agency’s list of Adjournment, Call-up, and Case Identification Codes. The EOIR uses these codes primarily for case tracking purposes in the agency’s automated system.
Testimony of DOJ Inspector General on the Detention and Treatment of September 11 Detainees
Testimony of DOJ Inspector General, Glenn A. Fine, before the Senate Judiciary Committee, on June 25, concerning the detention and treatment of September 11 detainees.
BIA Says Presidential or Gubernatorial Pardon Waives Only 237(a)(2)(A)(v) Grounds
The BIA held that a presidential or gubernatorial pardon waives only grounds specified in INA §237(a)(2)(A)(v), and that the pardon did not waive removability for a crime under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i). (Matter of Suh, 7/1/03)
BIA Announces Email Notification Service/Telephone Information Line/Citations Guidelines
Information on how to obtain BIA information include an automatic email notification service for precedent decisions, a telephone information line, and a Citations Guideline.
Practice Alert: BICE Obtains Jurisdiction of Deferred Action
DHS representatives, speaking at the AILA annual conference, indicated that BICE now has sole jurisdiction over deferred action, including related EADs. This policy applies to VAWA-related deferred action as well.
BICE Cooperates with Nigerian Government to Remove 89 Nigerian Nationals to Lagos
BICE and the government of Nigeria cooperated in the removal of 89 Nigerians to Lagos this week. The U.S. government has recently worked with the governments of Pakistan, Cambodia, El Salvador, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, and the Philippines in similar removal missions.
BIA Holds Quashed Drug Conviction Still Valid for Immigration Purposes
The BIA held that a drug conviction that was quashed by a Canadian court solely for immigration purposes was not based on a defect in the conviction or in the underlying proceedings and was therefore, still valid for immigration purposes. (Matter of Pickering, 6/11/03)
AILA Comments on Inspector General’s Report Detailing Post 9/11 Detention Practices
AILA issued a press release commenting on an oversight report by the Justice Department’s Inspector General that detailed the Department’s post-9/11 detention practices.
AILA Renews Call for an Independent Immigration Court
AILA issued a press release on 5/27/03, renewing its call for an independent immigration court in the wake of a May 21 district court decision denying an APA challenge to the BIA “reform” regulations.
BCIS Memo Summarizes Interim Final Rule on 212(h) Waivers
A 5/27/03 memo from William Yates, BCIS Acting Director of Operations, outlining the standards for adjudicating waivers of the criminal grounds of inadmissibility for immigrants under INA §212(h), as amended by a 12/26/02 interim final rule.
Justice Department Press Release on District Court Decision in the BIA Reform Case
The Justice Department’s press release reports on the District Court decision rejecting APA challenges to the regulations revising the structure and procedures at the BIA.
BIA Finds Past Persecution Based on Forced Sterilization
The BIA held that neither the passage of time since the sterilization of respondent’s wife, nor the lack of enforcement of coercive family planning, is a “fundamental change” in respondent’s personal circumstances to deny asylum under 8 CFR §1208.13(b)(1)(ii). (Matter of Y-T-L-, 5/22/03)
BICE Detention and Removal Memorandum to the Field on Implementation of DeMore v. Kim
A 5/15/03 memo from Anthony Tangeman, BICE Director, stating that BICE will send call-in letters to all individuals previously released and subject to DeMore v. Kim. Failure to appear will result in bond revocation and absconder treatment.
BIA Says Petty Offense Does Not Bar Cancellation of Removal
The BIA held respondent, who was convicted of a CIMT that qualifies as a petty offense, was not rendered ineligible for cancellation of removal under INA §240A(b)(1) by either his conviction or his commission of another offense that is not a CIMT. (Matter of Garcia-Hernandez, 5/8/03)