Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
Practice Alert: District Court Extends Existing Injunction to DACA Regulations
On 8/30/22, USCIS published a final rule codifying DACA. On 10/14/22, the Southern District of Texas issued an order partially blocking these regulations from going into effect but allowing USCIS to continue adjudicating DACA renewal applications.
CA5 Holds That BIA Erred by Failing to Consider Petitioner’s Evidence of Changed Country Conditions in Cameroon
The court granted the petition for review and remanded for further consideration of the petitioner’s Convention Against Torture (CAT) claim, finding that the BIA had failed to consider the petitioner’s evidence of changed country conditions in Cameroon. (Ndifon v. Garland, 10/4/22)
What Is Needed for a Motion to Substitute?
If an attorney is taking over representation of a client in removal proceedings from another attorney, a motion to substitute is needed. This tutorial will explain what is needed in a motion to substitute.
Speaker: Ben Crouse
What Is Needed for a Motion to Withdraw?
If an attorney cannot continue representation of a client in removal proceedings, a motion to withdraw is needed or else the attorney will be liable for not continuing with the representation. This tutorial will explain what is needed for a motion to withdraw.
Speaker: Ben Crouse
AILA Provides Minutes and Key Takeaways from Fall Meeting with ICE
AILA’s ICE Liaison Committee provided the minutes and key takeaways from its 10/25/22 meeting with ICE. Topics include prosecutorial discretion, notices to appear, I-551 and Form I-485 issues, biometrics, Webex and physical appearances, and more.
When Can the 212(d)(3) Waiver Be Used?
This video will explore in what circumstances the 212(d)(3) waiver can be used.
Speaker: Camiel Becker
CA5 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Petitioner Whose Proposed Social Group Consisted of Being a Family Member of Her Uncle
Where petitioner sought asylum based on membership in a proposed social group consisting of being a family member of her uncle, the court found there was no factual nexus between her proposed group and the alleged harm she had experienced in El Salvador. (Guevara-Fabian v. Garland, 10/25/22)
CA10 Finds That BIA Lacks Authority to Reconsider Removal Order of Petitioner Who Reentered Illegally
Denying the petition for review, the court held that INA §241(a)(5) clearly strips the BIA of authority to review a prior order of removal or to grant any relief provided by the INA once a removed noncitizen illegally reenters the United States. (Zapata-Chacon v. Garland, 10/25/22)
CA4 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Salvadoran Petitioner Who Witnessed Gang Activity and Filed Police Report
The court held that the petitioner’s proposed social group consisting of “Salvadoran women who are witnesses to gang criminal activity and targeted because they filed a police report” was not a cognizable particular social group (PSG) under the INA. (Morales v. Garland, 10/24/22)
CA9 Says It Lacks Jurisdiction to Review Expedited Removal Orders, Including Review of Constitutional Claims
The court held that it lacked jurisdiction over the petition for review, finding that Congress has clearly precluded it from asserting jurisdiction over the merits of individual expedited removal orders, even with regard to constitutional challenges. (Mendoza-Linares v. Garland, 10/24/22)
What Happened When I Actually Helped a Military Service Member
AILA Pro Bono Committee member Samantha Jiménez shares two inspiring examples of cases she was able to resolve for Military Service members through AILA's Military Assistance Program, using her immigration law expertise to give families much needed safety and security as their loved ones deploy.
Available MAP Cases
Use your immigration knowledge to help a military service member in need today. Take a case through the AILA Military Assistance Program’s new online system! Search by case type or location, share cases with colleagues, and sign up directly for a case through this easy-to-use online portal.
CA9 Remands CAT Claim Where Record Showed That Petitioner’s Attackers Were Guatemalan Police Officers
Granting the petition for review, the court held that the record showed that two of the petitioner’s attackers were police officers, and that the police officers’ participation in his attack showed acquiescence on the part of the Guatemalan government. (De Leon Lopez v. Garland, 10/21/22)
CA1 Holds That BIA Applied Incorrect Standard in Upholding IJ’s Denial of CAT Relief to Honduran Petitioner
The court concluded that, by requiring a showing of willful acceptance rather than willful blindness, the BIA applied the incorrect standard of review in upholding the IJ’s denial of Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief to the Honduran petitioner. (H.H. v. Garland, 10/21/22)
CA1 Says BIA Erred in Holding That People Who Are Incorrectly Perceived to Be Gang Members Cannot Be a PSG
Granting the petition for review and remanding, the court found that the BIA erred in holding that a group of people who are incorrectly perceived to be members of gangs cannot, as a categorical matter, constitute a particular social group (PSG) under the INA. (Chavez v. Garland, 10/21/22)
AILA and Partners Send Letter to Congress Urging Creation of Permanent Protections for Dreamers
AILA and partners sent a letter urging congressional leaders to swiftly pass legislative protections for Dreamers.
CA9 Upholds Denial of Asylum to Chinese Petitioner Who Claimed He Was Persecuted in China for His Christian Faith
The court found that the BIA’s affirmance of the IJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by substantial evidence, considering the totality of the administrative record, particularly the IJ’s findings about the petitioner’s demeanor and lack of candor. (Dong v. Garland, 10/19/22)
EOIR 30-Day Notice and Request for Comment on Proposed Changes to Form EOIR-26
EOIR 30-day notice and request for comment on proposed changes to Form EOIR-26, Notice of Appeal from a Decision of an Immigration Judge. Comments are due 11/17/22. (87 FR 63101, 10/18/22)
What Are the Parts of a Notice to Appear (NTA)?
Removal proceedings begin with the filing of a Notice to Appear (NTA). This tutorial will explain what is found on an NTA.
Speaker: Cain Oulahan
Obtaining a Stay of Removal Through Litigation
AILA author Robert Pauw explains how he determines whether a potential client might be well-served by pursuing federal litigation, including a situation where a removal order is final and unappealable but the person is eligible for some type of collateral relief.
District Court Rules That DHS May Continue to Accept Renewal Applications for Current DACA Recipients
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen issued an order ruling that DHS may continue to accept and grant Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) renewal applications for current DACA recipients who obtained DACA status on or before 7/16/21. (Texas, et al. v. United States, et al., 10/14/22)
CA1 Finds BIA Did Not Abuse Its Discretion in Denying Petitioner’s Motion to Remand Based on New Evidence
The court upheld the BIA’s decision to deny the petitioner’s motion to remand based on new evidence—namely, that the petitioner’s life partner had been diagnosed with brain cancer—finding that there was no error of law in the BIA’s explanation of its conclusion. (Moreno v. Garland, 10/14/22)
T Visas: How to Screen Consultations for Possible T Visa Relief
Learn how to ask the right questions so you don’t overlook possible T visa eligibility.
Speaker: Amy Cheung
Six Tips to Prepare for Direct Examination in an Asylum Hearing
How to organize and prepare for direct examination in court.
Speaker: Johanna Kelley
CA2 Says in Context of VTC Hearing IJ Completes Proceedings Under INA §242(b)(2) in Same Location Where They Began
The court held that, in the context of a video teleconference (VTC) hearing, an IJ completes proceedings under INA §242(b)(2) in the same location where they began unless there is evidence of a change of venue, and also denied the petitioner’s motion for a stay. (Sarr v. Garland, 10/12/22)