Featured Issue: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention
Update: On March 14, 2025, AILA released a statement in response to the Trump Administration resuming the practice of detaining families pending their court proceedings in the detention facility in Karnes County, TX, and indicating its plans to use a second facility in Dilley, TX, for family detention.
AILA calls on Congress to significantly reduce and phase out the use of immigration detention for immigration enforcement purposes. Detention is costly, leads to inefficiencies in processing cases, and has a long track record of human rights abuses. Community-based case management services and legal representation is more humane and should be offered to noncitizens to support their compliance of immigration obligations.
Contents
By the Numbers
- Book Outs/Books In: The Office of Homeland Security Statistics provides data on the number of migrants who are released from CBP custody to proceed with removal cases, transfers to ICE detention, and transfers to Health & Human Services (HHS). It also provides initial book-in data on ICE detention.
- Detention: For FY2024, Congress has provided funding to detain a daily average of 41,500 noncitizens at a cost of approximately $3.4 billion. During FY2023, Congress provided funding to detain a daily average of 34,000 noncitizens at a cost of approximately $2.9 billion. A December 2024 ICE memo in response to Congressional requests for information noted that increasing detention capacity by more than 60,000 beds will require a funding increase of approximately $3.2 billion dollars.
- Current Population: Per ICE, on December 8, 2024, there were 39,062 people in custody and on January 22, 2025, there were 39,703. For future data, see bi-weekly data posted on the ICE website under “Fiscal Year 2025 statistics” here.
- Daily Costs: Projected average daily costs of detaining an adult noncitizen: $164.65. The actual cost of detaining a noncitizen varies based on geographic region, length of detention, facility type, etc. A recent ICE memo in response to the costs of expanding detention noted that they expect a 5% inflationary increase from FY2024 enacted bed costs.
- Deaths at Adult Detention Centers - AILA supplies a continually updated list of ICE press releases announcing deaths in adult immigration detention. Note: there can be delays in ICE’s reporting of deaths and there have been instances of seriously ill individuals released from ICE custody, whose deaths are not included in this list.
- ICE Alternatives to Detention: For FY2024, Congress provided approximately $470 million in funding for ICE’s Alternatives to Detention (ADT) program. This is an increase from approximately $443 million in FY2023 in which 194,427 people were enrolled.
- Daily Costs of ICE ATD: Average daily cost for participants enrolled in ICE’s Intensive Appearance Supervision Program (ISAP): $8.00
- Community-Based Case Management: The FEMA/CRCL Case Management Pilot Program (CMPP), also known as the “Alternatives to Detention Grant Program,” received $15 million in continued funding for FY2024. Prior to January 20, 2025, it was operating in five cities.
- Average daily cost of providing case management for individual family members by a community-based organization (2018 pilot): $14.05
- Legal Representation: There is no right to a government-provided attorney in immigration court and 70 percent of detained persons face proceedings without counsel. There is a pilot program that serves adult individuals with mental disabilities. Congress did not provide any funding for adult legal representation for FY2024.
AILA’s Recommendations to Congress
- Reduce detention funding to at least 25,000 average daily population or less.
- Explicitly prohibit detention funding from being used to detain families and children in custodial settings.
- Provide continued funding community-based case management programs outside of ICE such as the Case Management Pilot Program (CMPP) operated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Conduct robust oversight of past congressional appropriations transparency requirements and continue to require ICE to disclose and publish information relating to detention contracts, inspection process and reports, detention data, and policies for the alternatives to detention program.
Background
Created in 2002, Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) has over 22,000 full-time employees, with a total annual budget of more than $9 billion. The agency has three core operational directorates: Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA). Housed within the Department of Homeland Security, ICE joins Customs & Border Protection (CBP) in making up the nation’s largest police force.
Immigration enforcement, including taking noncitizens into custody, is the largest single area of responsibility for ICE. ICE detains noncitizens arrested from the interior of the country and those transferred from the border. Twenty-years ago, the average daily population of detained immigrants was approximately 7,000. During the first Trump Administration, it reached a height of 50,000 average daily population. Regardless of the circumstances of their first encounter with authorities, noncitizens are detained across America in a sprawling network of private and public detention facilities. Most of these facilities operate through contracts between ICE (or, less commonly, the U.S. Marshals Service) and localities for the purposes of detaining noncitizens. In some cases, localities later sub-contract services for operating detention facilities to private prison companies. In other instances, localities reserve space in local, county, or state jails and prisons for the purposes of detaining immigrants. In all cases, localities are financially incentivized to detain individuals to increase profit margins from contracts. One key part of the financial equation is the use of noncitizens to clean and maintain facilities in exchange for $1 a day.
Immigration detention facilities, regardless of the type of contracts, have been the sites of serious and repeated allegations of abuse, including allegations of sexual assault, violations of religious freedom, medical neglect, and the punitive use of solitary confinement. In 2020, the U.S. had the highest number of deaths in ICE adult detention since 2005. Several deaths in custody have been found to have been preventable. Conditions in ICE custody have been described as “barbaric” and “negligent” by DHS experts.
Civil immigration detention works mainly to facilitate deportation. While ICE has the authority to allow most noncitizens to continue with their removal cases on the outside of custody, it often defaults to detention based on alleged “flight risk or threat to public safety.” The vagueness of these concepts frequently works against the liberty interests of noncitizens and there is generally a lack of uniformity when it comes to these discretionary releases. Only a certain portion of the overall noncitizen population must be detained under “mandatory detention” laws and even those individuals may be released based on certain exceptions.
Lastly, because immigration detention is considered “civil,” indigent noncitizens are not generally provided counsel. As a result, representation rates for noncitizens in detention are as low as 14% and directly correlate with the ability to secure release or long-term protection.
Reports and Briefings
- "No Human Being Should Be Held There": The Mistreatment of LGBTQ and HIV-Positive People in U.S. Federal Immigration Jails
- Physicians for Human Rights: Endless Nightmare”: Torture and Inhuman Treatment in Solitary Confinement in U.S. Immigration Detention
- Harvard University Press Release: New Report Documents the Mental and Physical Harm Experienced by Children in Immigration Detention
- AILA Policy Brief: Case Management: An Effective and Humane Alternative to Detention - November 2, 2022
- AILA Policy Brief: Moving The Nation Forward by Leaving Immigration Detention Behind - March 25, 2021
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA): Emergency Medical Responses at US Immigration and Customs Enforcement Detention Centers in California -November 29, 2023
- Notable findings include: a number of EMS calls for pregnant people at Otay Mesa; a shockingly low number of 911 calls for psychiatric emergencies, despite the high number of complaints of serious mental health issues in the detention centers; nearly a third of all detained people had an abnormal vital sign when EMS encountered them, a disturbing trend given the association between abnormal vital signs and deaths in ICE custody; and finally, the number of emergency calls that the authors could find in EMS systems was significantly lower than the number of ICE-reported medical emergencies, a serious discrepancy that calls into question why ICE facilities aren’t calling 911 more frequently when there is an emergency happening.
- Black Alliance for Just Immigration: Uncovering the Truth: Violence and Abuse Against Black Migrants in Immigration Detention - October 2022
- Oxfam America and the Tahirih Justice Center: Surviving Deterrence: How U.S. Asylum Deterrence Policies Normalize Gender-Based Violence, October 11, 2022
- Law Professor César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, TED Talk, The US can move past immigration prisons—and towards justice, July 27, 2022
- Alternatives to Detention: An Overview – American Immigration Council Fact Sheet, March 17, 2022
- Community Support for Migrants Navigating the U.S. Immigration System - February 26, 2021
- American Immigration Council Special Report: "Measuring In Absentia Removal in Immigration Court," Ingrid Eagly, Esq. and Steven Shafer, Esq. - January 28, 2021
Government Reports
- DHS Office of Inspector General: website has search function to view ICE detention audits, inspections, and evaluations completed by DHS OIG.
- ICE FOIA Library: Holds detention facility contracts, facility reviews, among other required posting information.
- U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO): Agency within the legislative branch that provides auditing, evaluative, and investigative services for the United States Congress. Website has search function to view audits done of ICE detention programs and policies.
- Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman Annual Report– June 20, 2023. As of January 29, 2025, the 2024 Annual Report had not been published.
- DHS Office of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Recommendation and Investigation Memo Collection: CRCL investigates abuses in immigration detention. CRCL issues recommendations to the relevant DHS Component aimed at addressing any civil rights or civil liberties concerns identified as part of its investigation.
- DHS Advisory Committee Final Report on Family Residential Centers - September 30, 2016.
Legislative and Administrative Advocacy
- The Case Management Pilot Program: A Humane, Effective Alternative to Immigration Detention - August 15, 2024
- Senators Send Letter Urging Appropriators to Include Funding for ATD - May 15, 2024
- AILA Statement to Senate on ICE's Use of Solitary Confinement - April 16, 2024
- AILA Sends Letter to White House Opposing Family Detention – March 13, 2023
- AILA and Partners Send Letter to White House Urging Closure of ICE Detention Sites - November 21, 2022
- Members of Congress Send Letter to DHS on Access to Counsel - November 3, 2022
- Over 100 House Democrats Send Letter to DHS to Halt Immigration Detention - March 10, 2022
Browse the Featured Issue: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention collection
Testimony of Ali Al-Maqtari on Due Process
Testimony of Mr. Ali Al-Maqtari before the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States Senate. Mr. Al-Maqtari, the spouse of a U.S. citizen, was detained for nine weeks and denied access to legal counsel.
AILA Testimony on Due Process and the Detention of Ali Al-Maqtari
Testimony of AILA Member Michael Boyle before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the importance of protecting due process and civil liberties in the aftermath of September 11, including examples of detainees that raise questions about their treatment and access to counsel.
Information About Detainees in INS Custody
List of the countries of birth, charges, and dates charged for individuals taken into INS custody or returned to custody after 9/11/01.
Official Minutes from 11/29/01 EOIR Liaison Meeting
Official minutes from EOIR/AILA liaison meeting of11/29/01, covering immigrant petitions in proceedings, Board and court procedures, September 11 aftermath, disciplinary rules, NTAs, motions, and other topics.
AILA/AILF Comment on INS Custody Regulation
AILA and AILF comment on the INS interim regulation extending to 48 hours or 'an additional reasonable period of time' the period in which INS can hold an individual in custody before deciding whether to issue an NTA.
INS Amends Custody Review Process
INS amends its rules on the review process with respect to long-term detention of persons subject to final orders of removal, deporation or exclusion, in light of the Supreme Court decision in Zadvydas v. Davis. (66 FR 56967, 11/14/01)
DOJ Request for Comments on Detainees Communications with Attorneys Being Monitored
DOJ interim rule for comment on the change to allow monitoring of communications between detainees and their attorneys where a determination is made that it is necessary to deter violence or terrorism. Notice of the monitoring must be given. (66 FR 55062, 10/31/01)
EOIR Interim Rule on Change to Custody Orders
EOIR interim rule for comment amending regulations to expand the provision to provide for a 10-day automatic stay of release while INS seeks BIA review of an IJ's release from custody order where the INS ordered the person held without bond or set a bond of more than $10,000. (66 FR 54909, 10/31/01)
AILA Testimony on Immigration and National Security
Testimony of AILA Executive Director Jeanne Butterfield before the Senate Immigration Subcommittee on "Effective Immigration Controls to Deter Terrorism" including proposals about new measures that Congress could mandate that would add to our deterrence capabilities.
INS Rule on Extension of Custody Period
INS interim rule on regulations on the period of time after an alien's arrest within which the Service must make a determination whether the alien will be continued in custody or released on bond or recognizance. Rule is effective 9/17/01 and comments are due by 11/19/01. (66 FR 48334, 9/20/01)
INS Provides Address for Release from Detention Requests
INS notice with the address where a detained individual must submit a written request for release on the ground that there is no significant likelihood that he will be removed in the reasonably foreseeable future, in accordance with Zadvydas v. Davis. (66 FR 44646, 8/24/01)
DOS Cable on Returns of Detainees
State Department advises posts of the U.S. Supreme Court decision, Zadvydas v. Davis. The State Department will exert all appropriate efforts to assist DOJ in returning detainees to the country of removal.
Attorney General Memo on the Detention of Certain Aliens
DOJ notice of memorandum from the Attorney General to the Acting Commissioner of the INS addressing detention of certain aliens held under final orders of removal and directs the INS to take a number of actions in response to Zadvydas v. Davis. (66 FR 38433, 7/24/01)
Attorney General on Supreme Court's Detention Decision
Statement from the Attorney General reflects hostility to Supreme Court's decision in Zadvydas v. David.
Attorney General Memo on Post-Order Custody Review
A 7/19/01 memo from Attorney General's office to the INS Acting Commissioner addressing post-order custody review after Zadvydas v. Davis.
Supreme Court Strikes Down Indefinite Detention
In Zadvydas v. Davis, 99-7791 and Ashcroft v. Ma, 00-38, the Supreme Court holds that the INS cannot indefinitely detain individuals who have been ordered deported but cannot be removed in the foreseeable future. (Zadvydas v. Davis, 6/28/01)
Supreme Court Says Habeas Corpus Still Alive
The Supreme Court, in its St. Cyr and Calcano decisions, upholds the right of individuals to seek habeas review of final removal orders, even if the cases involve criminal convictions.
BIA on Mandatory Detention and "When Released"
The BIA held that an alien who is released from criminal custody after expiration of the Transition Period Custody Rules is subject to mandatory detention under INA §236(c), even if he is not immediately taken into custody by INS when released. (Matter of Rojas, 5/18/01)
Texas State Bar Committee Minutes (3/17/01)
The State Bar of Texas Committee on Laws Relating to Immigration and Nationality minutes include reports from: AILA Texas Chapter, DOL, INS District Office, Pro BAR, Voluntary Agencies, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Immigration Project, TDHS.
Texas Bar Immigration Committee Meeting (1/26/01)
The Texas Bar's immigration committee's 1/26/01 meeting included reports from the TSC, the San Antonio District Office, the Texas Dept. of Human Services, ProBar, AILA, and others.
INS Final Regulation on Indefinite Detention
INS final rule for review process governing detention of persons ordered removed but whose removal has not been effected within 90 days. Rule is effective 12/21/00. (65 FR 80281, 12/21/00)
INS Memo on Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion
A 11/17/00 memo from Doris Meissner, Commissioner (INS) outlining considerations and procedures for the exercise of prosecutorial discretion in all stages of the enforcement process.
BIA on Mandatory Custody and Transitional Rules
The BIA held that INA §236(c) does not apply to an alien who was convicted after expiration of the Transition Period Custody Rules, but who was released prior to the expiration of the rules, and who was not confined or restrained as a result of that conviction. (Matter of West, 10/26/00)
ICE Detention Operations Manual (2000)
ICE Detention Operations Manual, issued in September 2000, providing standards for detainee services, health care, security, and other conditions of confinement at immigration detention facilities.
Immigration Advocates Continue to Press to Fix Harsh 1996 Laws
AILA press release on H.R. 5062, which recognized the harshness and over breadth of the 1996 immigration laws, stating “The unanimous passage of this bipartisan legislation in the House sends an important message that this year we can and should restore fairness to our immigration laws.”