Featured Issue: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention
Update: On March 14, 2025, AILA released a statement in response to the Trump Administration resuming the practice of detaining families pending their court proceedings in the detention facility in Karnes County, TX, and indicating its plans to use a second facility in Dilley, TX, for family detention.
AILA calls on Congress to significantly reduce and phase out the use of immigration detention for immigration enforcement purposes. Detention is costly, leads to inefficiencies in processing cases, and has a long track record of human rights abuses. Community-based case management services and legal representation is more humane and should be offered to noncitizens to support their compliance of immigration obligations.
Contents
By the Numbers
- Book Outs/Books In: The Office of Homeland Security Statistics provides data on the number of migrants who are released from CBP custody to proceed with removal cases, transfers to ICE detention, and transfers to Health & Human Services (HHS). It also provides initial book-in data on ICE detention.
- Detention: For FY2024, Congress has provided funding to detain a daily average of 41,500 noncitizens at a cost of approximately $3.4 billion. During FY2023, Congress provided funding to detain a daily average of 34,000 noncitizens at a cost of approximately $2.9 billion. A December 2024 ICE memo in response to Congressional requests for information noted that increasing detention capacity by more than 60,000 beds will require a funding increase of approximately $3.2 billion dollars.
- Current Population: Per ICE, on December 8, 2024, there were 39,062 people in custody and on January 22, 2025, there were 39,703. For future data, see bi-weekly data posted on the ICE website under “Fiscal Year 2025 statistics” here.
- Daily Costs: Projected average daily costs of detaining an adult noncitizen: $164.65. The actual cost of detaining a noncitizen varies based on geographic region, length of detention, facility type, etc. A recent ICE memo in response to the costs of expanding detention noted that they expect a 5% inflationary increase from FY2024 enacted bed costs.
- Deaths at Adult Detention Centers - AILA supplies a continually updated list of ICE press releases announcing deaths in adult immigration detention. Note: there can be delays in ICE’s reporting of deaths and there have been instances of seriously ill individuals released from ICE custody, whose deaths are not included in this list.
- ICE Alternatives to Detention: For FY2024, Congress provided approximately $470 million in funding for ICE’s Alternatives to Detention (ADT) program. This is an increase from approximately $443 million in FY2023 in which 194,427 people were enrolled.
- Daily Costs of ICE ATD: Average daily cost for participants enrolled in ICE’s Intensive Appearance Supervision Program (ISAP): $8.00
- Community-Based Case Management: The FEMA/CRCL Case Management Pilot Program (CMPP), also known as the “Alternatives to Detention Grant Program,” received $15 million in continued funding for FY2024. Prior to January 20, 2025, it was operating in five cities.
- Average daily cost of providing case management for individual family members by a community-based organization (2018 pilot): $14.05
- Legal Representation: There is no right to a government-provided attorney in immigration court and 70 percent of detained persons face proceedings without counsel. There is a pilot program that serves adult individuals with mental disabilities. Congress did not provide any funding for adult legal representation for FY2024.
AILA’s Recommendations to Congress
- Reduce detention funding to at least 25,000 average daily population or less.
- Explicitly prohibit detention funding from being used to detain families and children in custodial settings.
- Provide continued funding community-based case management programs outside of ICE such as the Case Management Pilot Program (CMPP) operated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Conduct robust oversight of past congressional appropriations transparency requirements and continue to require ICE to disclose and publish information relating to detention contracts, inspection process and reports, detention data, and policies for the alternatives to detention program.
Background
Created in 2002, Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) has over 22,000 full-time employees, with a total annual budget of more than $9 billion. The agency has three core operational directorates: Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO), Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), and the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA). Housed within the Department of Homeland Security, ICE joins Customs & Border Protection (CBP) in making up the nation’s largest police force.
Immigration enforcement, including taking noncitizens into custody, is the largest single area of responsibility for ICE. ICE detains noncitizens arrested from the interior of the country and those transferred from the border. Twenty-years ago, the average daily population of detained immigrants was approximately 7,000. During the first Trump Administration, it reached a height of 50,000 average daily population. Regardless of the circumstances of their first encounter with authorities, noncitizens are detained across America in a sprawling network of private and public detention facilities. Most of these facilities operate through contracts between ICE (or, less commonly, the U.S. Marshals Service) and localities for the purposes of detaining noncitizens. In some cases, localities later sub-contract services for operating detention facilities to private prison companies. In other instances, localities reserve space in local, county, or state jails and prisons for the purposes of detaining immigrants. In all cases, localities are financially incentivized to detain individuals to increase profit margins from contracts. One key part of the financial equation is the use of noncitizens to clean and maintain facilities in exchange for $1 a day.
Immigration detention facilities, regardless of the type of contracts, have been the sites of serious and repeated allegations of abuse, including allegations of sexual assault, violations of religious freedom, medical neglect, and the punitive use of solitary confinement. In 2020, the U.S. had the highest number of deaths in ICE adult detention since 2005. Several deaths in custody have been found to have been preventable. Conditions in ICE custody have been described as “barbaric” and “negligent” by DHS experts.
Civil immigration detention works mainly to facilitate deportation. While ICE has the authority to allow most noncitizens to continue with their removal cases on the outside of custody, it often defaults to detention based on alleged “flight risk or threat to public safety.” The vagueness of these concepts frequently works against the liberty interests of noncitizens and there is generally a lack of uniformity when it comes to these discretionary releases. Only a certain portion of the overall noncitizen population must be detained under “mandatory detention” laws and even those individuals may be released based on certain exceptions.
Lastly, because immigration detention is considered “civil,” indigent noncitizens are not generally provided counsel. As a result, representation rates for noncitizens in detention are as low as 14% and directly correlate with the ability to secure release or long-term protection.
Reports and Briefings
- "No Human Being Should Be Held There": The Mistreatment of LGBTQ and HIV-Positive People in U.S. Federal Immigration Jails
- Physicians for Human Rights: Endless Nightmare”: Torture and Inhuman Treatment in Solitary Confinement in U.S. Immigration Detention
- Harvard University Press Release: New Report Documents the Mental and Physical Harm Experienced by Children in Immigration Detention
- AILA Policy Brief: Case Management: An Effective and Humane Alternative to Detention - November 2, 2022
- AILA Policy Brief: Moving The Nation Forward by Leaving Immigration Detention Behind - March 25, 2021
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA): Emergency Medical Responses at US Immigration and Customs Enforcement Detention Centers in California -November 29, 2023
- Notable findings include: a number of EMS calls for pregnant people at Otay Mesa; a shockingly low number of 911 calls for psychiatric emergencies, despite the high number of complaints of serious mental health issues in the detention centers; nearly a third of all detained people had an abnormal vital sign when EMS encountered them, a disturbing trend given the association between abnormal vital signs and deaths in ICE custody; and finally, the number of emergency calls that the authors could find in EMS systems was significantly lower than the number of ICE-reported medical emergencies, a serious discrepancy that calls into question why ICE facilities aren’t calling 911 more frequently when there is an emergency happening.
- Black Alliance for Just Immigration: Uncovering the Truth: Violence and Abuse Against Black Migrants in Immigration Detention - October 2022
- Oxfam America and the Tahirih Justice Center: Surviving Deterrence: How U.S. Asylum Deterrence Policies Normalize Gender-Based Violence, October 11, 2022
- Law Professor César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, TED Talk, The US can move past immigration prisons—and towards justice, July 27, 2022
- Alternatives to Detention: An Overview – American Immigration Council Fact Sheet, March 17, 2022
- Community Support for Migrants Navigating the U.S. Immigration System - February 26, 2021
- American Immigration Council Special Report: "Measuring In Absentia Removal in Immigration Court," Ingrid Eagly, Esq. and Steven Shafer, Esq. - January 28, 2021
Government Reports
- DHS Office of Inspector General: website has search function to view ICE detention audits, inspections, and evaluations completed by DHS OIG.
- ICE FOIA Library: Holds detention facility contracts, facility reviews, among other required posting information.
- U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO): Agency within the legislative branch that provides auditing, evaluative, and investigative services for the United States Congress. Website has search function to view audits done of ICE detention programs and policies.
- Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman Annual Report– June 20, 2023. As of January 29, 2025, the 2024 Annual Report had not been published.
- DHS Office of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Recommendation and Investigation Memo Collection: CRCL investigates abuses in immigration detention. CRCL issues recommendations to the relevant DHS Component aimed at addressing any civil rights or civil liberties concerns identified as part of its investigation.
- DHS Advisory Committee Final Report on Family Residential Centers - September 30, 2016.
Legislative and Administrative Advocacy
- The Case Management Pilot Program: A Humane, Effective Alternative to Immigration Detention - August 15, 2024
- Senators Send Letter Urging Appropriators to Include Funding for ATD - May 15, 2024
- AILA Statement to Senate on ICE's Use of Solitary Confinement - April 16, 2024
- AILA Sends Letter to White House Opposing Family Detention – March 13, 2023
- AILA and Partners Send Letter to White House Urging Closure of ICE Detention Sites - November 21, 2022
- Members of Congress Send Letter to DHS on Access to Counsel - November 3, 2022
- Over 100 House Democrats Send Letter to DHS to Halt Immigration Detention - March 10, 2022
Browse the Featured Issue: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention collection
BIA Says an Alien Returning to the U.S. on Advance Parole Is an "Arriving Alien"
The BIA held that an alien who arrives in the U.S. on advance parole is an "arriving alien," as defined in the regulations and that the IJ has no authority to consider the bond request of an alien returning pursuant to a grant of advance parole. (Matter of Oseiwusu, 3/25/98)
CLINIC Report on Credible Fear and Expedited Removal
Report from the Catholic Legal Immigration Network (CLINIC) on INS implementation of the expedited removal and credible fear screening process.
INS Revises Detention Policy
A 10/22/97 from Mark K. Reed Acting Executive Associate Commissioner (INS) discussing the definition of "lawfully admitted" for purposes of the Transition Period Custody Rules.
INS Letter Invoking IIRIRA Transitional Period Custody Rules
Undated letter from Doris Meissner, Commissioner, INS to Henry J. Hyde, Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee, invoking the Transitional Period Custody Rules (TPCR) under IIRIRA §309(b)(3) for FY1998, due to a lack of sufficient INS detention space.
INS on Detention and Release of Criminal Aliens
INS/EOIR proposed rule amending the regulations by establishing a regulatory framework for the detention of criminal aliens pursuant to the Transition Period Custody Rules (TPCR) set forth in the IIRAIRA. (62 FR 48138, 9/15/97)
INS Advises on “Unaccompanied Minors” & Removal
An 8/21/97 memo from Paul Virtue, Acting Executive Associate Commissioner (INS) setting forth new policy for the treatment of minors subject to expedited removal.
Detention Use Policy
A 7/14/97 memo from Doris Meissner, Commissioner (INS) providing new mandatory detention guidelines to be used in the context of expedited removal and final orders of removal.
GAO on Detention and Removal of Aliens
GAO report to Congress on INS regulations, "Inspection and Expedited Removal of Aliens; Detention and Removal of Aliens; Conduct of Removal Proceedings; Asylum Procedures."
INS Interim Rule on Expedited Removal
INS interim rule implementing provisions of IIRIRA governing expedited and regular removal proceedings, handling of asylum claims, and other activities involving the apprehension, detention, hearing of claims, and ultimately the removal of inadmissible and deportable aliens. (62 FR 10311, 3/6/97)
EOIR Memo on Whether Mandatory Detention Apply to Aggravated Felon
Memorandum from EOIR on whether the mandatory detention provisions of IIRAIRA's Transition Period Custody Rules (TPCR) apply to MM, an alien now defined as an aggravated felon due to a sole 1985 conviction for alien smuggling.
INS Proposed Rule on Expedited Removal
INS rule proposes to amend INS and EOIR regulations governing the conduct of both expedited and regular removal proceedings, and handling of asylum claims. Comments due by 2/3/97. (62 FR 444, 1/3/97)
EOIR Memo on Notices of Immigration Judge Hearings
EOIR interim operating policy and procedure memorandum 97-2 on procedures for mailing notices of Immigration Judge hearings for in-person hearings, as well as no-detained and detained cases. Also includes procedures for rescheduled or continued hearings.
AILA Amicus Brief on Transitional Custody Rules
AILA amicus brief to BIA regarding the effect of Section 303(b)(3) of IIRIRA on custody determination.
INS Commissioner Invokes Custody Rule
A 10/9/96 letter from INS Commissioner Doris Meissner, pursuant to authority delegated to her by the Attorney General, notifying Congress that there is insufficient detention space and personnel for detention purposes and invoking the “Transition Period Custody Rule.”
Text of Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRAIRA)
Division C of the Commerce/State/Justice appropriations legislation makes profound and far-reaching changes to the Immigration and Nationality Act.
INS Advises on Detention Guidelines
A 5/7/96 memo from Chris Sale, Deputy Commissioner (INS) regarding AEDPA Implementation Instruction 1: Amendment to the Mandatory Detention Requirement of Section 242(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
P.L. 104-132, AEDPA
Full text of the 'Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996' (AEDPA) signed into law on 4/27/95.
Presidential Memo on Deterring Illegal Immigration
A memorandum from President Clinton on the administrations policies for deterring illegal immigration. (60 FR 7885, 2/7/95)
CA9 Says Government Must Expedite Hearing for Incarcerated LPR
The court found that the incarcerated LPR had standing to bring a mandamus action to compel INS to give him an expedited deportation hearing and that the government has a duty to initiate and if possible, complete deportation proceedings before his release date. (Garcia v. Taylor, 11/10/94)
EOIR OPPM 84-1: Case Priorities and Processing
EOIR issued Operating Policies and Procedures Memorandum 84-1: Case Priorities and Processing on detained cases, processing of detained bond redetermination hearings, use of questionnaires and bond redetermination hearings, and exclusion and other cases.