Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
26 - 50 of 13,026 collection items
Practice Resources

Arguing Against Pretermission of Asylum Cases in Immigration Court

This practice pointer outlines legal arguments for challenging pretermission of asylum applications for clients in removal proceedings. This comes after EOIR's recent policy memo, PM 22-28, published on April 11, 2025.

5/19/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051905. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Finds That District Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Review USCIS’s Denial of Adjustment of Status Application

The court held that a denial of an application for adjustment of status under INA §245 is a “judgment” for purposes of INA §242(a)(2)(B)(i), regardless of whether it is issued by an immigration court or USCIS. (Xia v. Bondi, 5/19/25)

5/19/25 AILA Doc. No. 25052033. Adjustment of Status, Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: Reports of BIA Setting Briefing Deadlines in ECAS Without Issuing Briefing Schedule

Members report seeing BIA briefing deadlines appear in ECAS without the issuance of a briefing schedule. AILA is urging members to check ECAS on all pending BIA cases.

5/16/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051503. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Finds Respondent Was Detained under INA §235(b) and Ineligible for Release on Bond

The BIA held that an applicant for admission who is arrested and detained without a warrant while arriving in the United States and then placed in removal proceedings is detained under INA §235(b) and ineligible for release on bond under INA §236(a). Matter of Q. Li, 29 I&N Dec. 66 (BIA 2025)

5/16/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051603. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Presidential Proclamation Establishing “Project Homecoming”

On 5/9/25, President Trump signed a proclamation that creates a process for departure for undocumented immigrants using the CBP Home app, provides government-funded flights and an exit bonus, directs DHS to increase its enforcement and removal operations force, and more. (90 FR 20357, 5/14/25)

5/14/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051200. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies

ICE Official Guidance for "Unaccompanied Alien Children Join Initiative, Field Implementation"

ICE  guidance for "Unaccompanied Alien Children Joint Initiative, Field Implementation". Outlines phases of implementing the joint DHS-ICE-HSI initiative to locate UACs who have not had contact with HHS-ORR since being released from their custody.

5/14/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051403. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief, Unaccompanied Children
Memo & Regulatory Comments

AILA Submits Comment Opposing Reduction of the BIA

AILA submitted a public comment today, opposing the April 14th, 2025 announcement that the BIA would be reduced to just 15 members while there is currently a historic backlog.

5/13/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051307. Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: OPLA to Begin Filing Motions to Reopen Administratively Closed Cases

AILA received reports that ICE OPLA will begin filing motions to recalendar in all cases that were previously administratively closed.

5/12/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051201. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

DOJ Files Emergency Request to SCOTUS to End Injunction Halting Deportations

DOJ filed an emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court asking the Court to end a temporary injunction issued 4/19/25 halting the deportation of immigrants detained pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act (AEA). (A.A.R.P. et al. v. Trump, et al., 5/12/25)

5/12/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051563. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Upholds Motion to Remand Denial Where Petitioner Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case for Cancellation Eligibility

The court upheld BIA’s finding that petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case of eligibility for cancellation of removal where he offered no evidence that his removal would cause exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his U.S.-citizen daughter. (Soto-Santos v. Bondi, 5/12/25)

5/12/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051602. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Holds That Petitioner Failed to Show Procedural Error or Prejudice in Challenging IJ’s Competency Finding

The court denied the petition for review, concluding that the BIA did not err in affirming the IJ’s competency finding at the petitioner’s merits hearing based on sufficient evidence of competency and no showing of fundamental error or any resulting prejudice. (Mohamed v. Bondi, 5/12/25)

5/12/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051903. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Issues Policy Memo with an Addendum to Previous Policy Memo

On 5/9/25, EOIR Acting Director Sirce Owen issued Policy Memorandum (PM) 25-31, “Addendum to Policy Memorandum 25-30,” providing additional guidance regarding clerical transfers of cases between non-detained and detained dockets, and clarifying section VI of PM 25-30, “Clerical Transfers.”

5/9/25 AILA Doc. No. 25050932. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Holds That Petitioner’s Texas Conviction for Online Solicitation of a Minor Is “Crime of Child Abuse”

The court upheld the BIA’s determination that petitioner’s Texas conviction for online solicitation of a minor rendered him removable under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i) for committing a “crime of child abuse,” and upheld BIA’s denial of his motion to reconsider. (Sandoval Argueta v. Bondi, 5/9/25)

5/9/25 AILA Doc. No. 25051404. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Holds That Petitioner’s California Assault Conviction Was a Particularly Serious Crime

The court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in finding that the petitioner’s assault conviction was a particularly serious crime rendering him ineligible for withholding relief, and that the BIA did not err in denying his CAT claim. (G.C. v. Bondi, 7/30/24, amended 5/8/25)

5/8/25 AILA Doc. No. 24080902. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: EOIR Is Circulating Misleading Legal Advisories to Respondents

On or about April 14, 2025, AILA began receiving reports of new flyers posted in EOIR courts nationwide that list several confusing and misleading statements as to the purported “benefits” and “consequences” of self-deportation for those in removal proceedings.

5/7/25 AILA Doc. No. 25050511. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

DHS Announces Travel Assistance and Stipend for Voluntary Self-Deportation

DHS announced that undocumented immigrants can receive financial and travel assistance to facilitate travel back to their home country through the CBP Home App, and can also receive a stipend of $1,000 dollars paid after their return to their home country has been confirmed through the app.

5/5/25 AILA Doc. No. 25050508. Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Press Releases

AILA Statement: Trump Administration Lays Trap with Self-Deportation Offer

In response to the DHS announcement of a “stipend” for people choosing to self-deport from the United States, AILA cautioned individuals noting that “No one should accept this without first obtaining good legal advice from an immigration attorney or other qualified representative.”

5/5/25 AILA Doc. No. 25050512. Removal & Relief
Federal Court Cases

District Court Permanently Blocks Deportations of Alleged Venezuelan Gang Members under AEA

A Texas federal district court permanently enjoined the Trump Administration from deporting alleged gang members from Venezuela under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA), finding the gang’s conduct within the United States does not constitute an “invasion.” (J.A.V. et al. v. Trump et al., 5/1/25)

5/1/25 AILA Doc. No. 25050104. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE Press Release on Operation Tidal Wave in Florida

ICE announced that it led a statewide operation in Florida 4/21/25 through 4/26/25 that resulted in 1,120 arrests of undocumented individuals. ICE states that 63 percent of those arrested had existing criminal arrests or convictions.

5/1/25 AILA Doc. No. 25050200. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Holds That Petitioner’s Massachusetts Unarmed Assault Conviction Was an Aggravated Felony

The court concluded that the petitioner’s Massachusetts unarmed assault conviction was categorically an aggravated felony attempted theft offense under the INA, rendering the petitioner removable under INA §237(a)(2)(A)(iii). (Baptista v. Bondi, 5/1/25)

5/1/25 AILA Doc. No. 25050602. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: ICE to Start Notifying Attorneys When Detained Clients are Transferred

Beginning May 1, 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will send attorneys, EOIR-accredited representatives, and law students automatic notices when their clients are transferred between facilities.

4/30/25 AILA Doc. No. 25043004. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Upholds Denial of Cancellation Where IJ Found Petitioner Lacked Good Moral Character Based on Catchall Provision

The court held that substantial evidence supported the IJ’s decision finding that the petitioner lacked good moral character based on the catchall provision in INA §101(f), and thus that he was ineligible for cancellation of removal pursuant to INA §240A(b). (Ibarra v. Bondi, 4/29/25)

4/29/25 AILA Doc. No. 25050510. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

DHS Provides a Privacy Impact Assessment for CPB Home

DHS released a Privacy Impact Assessment addressing privacy risks in the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of the CBP Home application information.

4/28/25 AILA Doc. No. 25043001. Admissions & Border, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Holds That BIA Erred by Relying on IJ’s Inadequate Nexus Analysis as to Ecuadorian Petitioner’s Asylum Claim

The court held that the BIA erred by not applying de novo review to the IJ’s ultimate nexus determination and by not recognizing or correcting the IJ’s failure to conduct the appropriate mixed-motivation nexus analysis in reaching its decision. (Mayancela Guaman v. Bondi, 4/28/25)

4/28/25 AILA Doc. No. 25043002. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief
Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Practicing under the New Trump Administration

This page curates resources from AILA and other organizations that members may find helpful as they adapt to practicing under the new Trump Administration.