Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
6,001 - 6,025 of 12,970 collection items
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Attorney General Appoints Three New Board Members to the BIA

EOIR announces that Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch has appointed Molly Kendall Clark, Ellen Liebowitz, and Blair T. O’Connor as board members to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Notice includes biographical information on the new board members.

2/26/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022908. Removal & Relief

H.R. 4646: Fair Day in Court for Kids Act of 2016

On 2/26/16, Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), and Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA) introduced the House version of the Fair Day in Court for Kids Act 2016, which mandates that unaccompanied children and vulnerable immigrants receive legal representation.

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Says Petitioner Failed to Show That His Conviction Was Not Vacated for Immigration Purposes

The court upheld BIA's finding that petitioner failed to prove that his state court conviction for theft in the fourth degree, a crime involving moral turpitude, was vacated for a substantive or procedural reason and not for immigration purposes. (Andrade-Zamora v. Lynch, 2/26/16)

2/26/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022901. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Press Releases

AILA Applauds House Access to Counsel Legislation

In response to the introduction of the “Fair Day in Court for Kids Act” in the House of Representatives, AILA President Victor Nieblas Pradis noted that the bill would, “stop the injustice of forcing vulnerable individuals to face deportation without counsel.”

AILA Public Statements

Immigrant Rights Organizations Argue Against Government’s Inhumane Family Detention Policies

The four CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project partners joined with other immigrant rights organizations in an amicus brief explaining how the government has misinterpreted the Flores settlement and failed to comply with Judge Dolly Gee's August 2015 ruling in the case.

2/25/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022500. Asylum, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

District Court Awards $82,500 to Plaintiff Wrongfully Detained for More Than Three Years

The district court found that the plaintiff, a U.S. citizen who was wrongfully arrested and detained for more than three years and subjected to removal proceedings, had met his burden of proof with respect to his false arrest and imprisonment claims. (Watson v. United States, 2/25/16)

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Upholds Denial of Motion to Reconsider Despite Change in Law Favorable to Petitioner

The court held that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that a change in the law favorable to petitioner, which occurred long after the expiration of his filing deadline, did not constitute extraordinary circumstances justifying equitable tolling. (Omar v. Lynch, 2/25/16)

2/25/16 AILA Doc. No. 16071507. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

CBP Issues Memo on Admissibility Processing and Family Units

CBP issued a memo to admissibility processing and family units, noting that when family units are encountered, the designation must be noted for the purposes of statistics and ICE detention actions. Memo includes the definition of a family unit.

2/25/16 AILA Doc. No. 18112833. Admissions & Border, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Holds Pennsylvania Possession with Intent to Deliver Marijuana Conviction Is Not an Aggravated Felony

Unpublished BIA decision holds 35 Pa. Cons. Stat. 780-113(a)(30) is not an aggravated felony, even though a separate statute specifically criminalizes the distribution of a small amount of marijuana for no remuneration. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Rodriguez-Trinidad, 2/24/16)

2/24/16 AILA Doc. No. 16092737. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Finds Petitioner's Nine-Day Detention and Beatings Did Not Qualify as Past Persecution

The court held that a single detention, even one accompanied by beatings, does not necessarily rise to the level of past persecution, and upheld BIA's finding that petitioner's treatment by family planning authorities in China did not qualify as past persecution. (Chen v. Lynch, 2/24/16)

2/24/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022902. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Says Women with Children Whose Husbands Live and Work in the U.S. Is Not a PSG

The court held that the BIA supportably found that petitioner had not presented evidence that her proposed particular social group (PSG)—women with children whose husbands live and work in the U.S.—was socially distinct. (Granada-Rubio v. Lynch, 2/24/16)

2/24/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022903. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Says State Offense Must Require Violent Physical Force to Be "Crime of Violence"

The BIA held that, for a state offense to qualify as a crime of violence under 18 USC §16(a), the state statute must require as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of violent physical force. Matter of Guzman-Polanco, 26 I&N Dec. 713 (BIA 2016)

2/24/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022501. Crimes, Removal & Relief

AIM: Training for Immigration Court

In February's AILA Interview of the Month, AILA member Ellen Messali shares how she worked with the Hartford Immigration Court to provide training and mock trials for immigration lawyers who may not have courtroom experience and how other chapters can replicate the success.

2/24/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022405. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA and the NJIC File Amicus Brief with CA11 on Issue Exhaustion

AILA joined the National Immigrant Justice Center (NJIC) in filing an amicus brief with the 11th Circuit in Jeune v. Lynch urging the court to treat issue exhaustion as a claims-processing rule rather than a jurisdictional matter.

2/24/16 AILA Doc. No. 16031008. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

Amicus Brief in Flores Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellees and Urging Affirmance

Immigration rights organizations filed an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs-appellees and in support of affirmation of the district court judgment in the Flores settlement agreement lawsuit.

AILA Public Statements, Correspondence

AILA Statement to Senate Judiciary on Protecting Children, Families, and Other Border Arrivals

AILA submitted a statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee for the 2/23/16 hearing “The Unaccompanied Children Crisis: Does the Administration Have a Plan to Stop the Border Surge and Adequately Monitor the Children?”

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Upholds Withholding of Removal Denial to El Salvadorian Whose Murdered Cousin Belonged to Gang

The court held that none of the proposed family-based social groups in which petitioner claimed membership had the kind of visibility and particularity required to constitute a recognizable social group. (Aguinada-Lopez v. Lynch, 2/23/16)

2/23/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022400. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Updated United States-Mexico Local Repatriation Agreements

DHS and the Mexican government signed nine local repatriation agreements to establish local procedures for the orderly and safe repatriation of Mexican nationals from the United States to Mexico.

2/23/16 AILA Doc. No. 16030204. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

DHS Announces that the United States and Mexico Signed Updated Repatriation Arrangements

DHS signed nine local repatriation arrangements, covering all locations along the U.S.-Mexico border, with information on general repatriation procedures, location-specific information, and specific measures for vulnerable populations, such as unaccompanied minors and those with medical conditions.

2/23/16 AILA Doc. No. 16030205. Humanitarian Parole, Removal & Relief, Unaccompanied Children
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Remands for BIA to Determine Whether Asylum Status Is Terminated upon Adjustment to LPR Status

Finding that the BIA did not address relevant subsections of INA §201, DHS regulations, and previous BIA decisions, the court remanded for the BIA to consider in the first instance whether a petitioner's asylum status is terminated upon adjustment to LPR status. (Ali v. Lynch, 2/22/16)

2/22/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022401. Adjustment of Status, Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Upholds BIA's Marriage Fraud Finding Despite Procedural Errors

Despite procedural errors made by USCIS and the BIA, the court held that substantial evidence, including the petitioner's own written confessions, supported the BIA's finding that petitioner had engaged in marriage fraud under INA §204(c). (Sehgal v. Lynch, 2/22/16)

2/22/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022402. Family Immigration, Family-Based Immigrants, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Says BIA Did Not Err in Following Matter of J-E- to Deny Petitioner's CAT Application

Deferring to the BIA's interpretation of the CAT's intent requirement as articulated in Matter of J-E-, the court found that the BIA did not err in denying petitioner's application for deferral of removal under CAT. (Oxygene v. Lynch, 2/22/16)

2/22/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022403. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Grants Withholding of Removal to Woman Who Fears FGM in Botswana

The court held that substantial evidence did not support the BIA's conclusion that petitioner likely would not be subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM) if she were removed to Botswana, in light of petitioner's credible testimony that her family practiced FGM. (Musa v. Lynch, 2/19/16)

2/19/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022404. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Upholds CAT Denial Where Petitioner Failed to Show She Would Likely Be Tortured in Haiti

The court upheld the BIA's denial of the petitioner's application for CAT relief, finding that the BIA did not err in concluding that the petitioner failed to show that she would more likely than not be tortured if removed to Haiti. (Mervil v. Lynch, 2/19/16)

2/19/16 AILA Doc. No. 16022200. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Grants Adjustment Application Despite Allegation of Visa Fraud

Unpublished BIA decision reverses discretionary denial of adjustment application upon finding that positive equities outweighed alleged involvement in fraudulent petition for a religious visa. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Mirza, 2/19/16)

2/19/16 AILA Doc. No. 16092736. Adjustment of Status, Removal & Relief