Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
5,926 - 5,950 of 13,033 collection items
Media Tools

AILA Member Talking Points on the ICE Raids Targeting Central American Families

AILA members can use these Talking Points with media when asked about ICE raids targeting Central American families.

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Upholds CAT Denial to Former Gang Member Who Had Been Removed to El Salvador

The court upheld BIA’s denial of CAT protection, holding that substantial evidence supported its determination that it is not more likely than not that the petitioner, a former gang member with gang-related tattoos, will be tortured in El Salvador. (Del Cid Marroquin v. Lynch, 5/18/16)

5/18/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051961. Asylum & Refugees, Removal & Relief

AILA Quicktake #166: ICE Announces New Surge of Arrests

AILA's Director of Advocacy Greg Chen shares information regarding ICE's announcement that it would be conducting another surge of arrests aimed at families and unaccompanied minors across the nation and what AILA is doing.

AIM: How Cities and Immigration Collaboratives Can Work Together

In May's AILA Interview of the Month, Ana Camila Herrera, Managing Attorney, Dolores Street Community Services, shares how renewed funding for the San Francisco Immigration Legal Defense Collaborative will help provide representation to unaccompanied minors and families in immigration court.

5/18/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051806. Humanitarian Parole, Removal & Relief, Unaccompanied Children
Media Tools

Letter to ICE from 69 Mothers Detained in Dilley Pleading for Freedom

Pleading for an end to their imprisonment, 69 mothers who have been detained with their children at the South Texas Family Residential Center, an immigration detention facility in Dilley, Texas, wrote a public letter to Immigration and Customs Enforcement; letter is available in Spanish and English.

5/18/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051905. Asylum & Refugees, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief

Children in Immigration Court: Over 95 Percent Represented by an Attorney Appear in Court

An American Immigration Council factsheet demonstrating that children appear in immigration court and that when children are represented by counsel, appearance rates are even higher. This data suggests that children who do fail to appear are victims of the system’s deficits.

5/17/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051866. Humanitarian Parole, Removal & Relief, Unaccompanied Children

Detained, Deceived, and Deported: Experiences of Recently Deported Central American Families

The American Immigration Council interviewed individuals who were deported (or whose partners were deported) and their accounts reveal the dangerous circumstances these women and their children faced upon return to their home countries, as well as serious problems in the deportation process.

5/17/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051801. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

FOIA Results on Bond Practices

Bond-related documents from ERO and Libre by Nexus (private ankle monitoring/GPS devices) released in response to a FOIA. Special thanks to Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg.

5/17/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051730. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief

TRAC Report Finds Number of Civil Immigration Lawsuits Filed Has Risen Steadily During Past Year

A TRAC report found that the government reported 235 new civil filings in the immigration category in April 2016, a 37.7 percent increase from one year ago. The data shows that civil immigration filings are up approximately 30 percent from levels reported five years ago, in April 2011.

Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Opens Immigration Court in Aurora, CO

EOIR announced that it will be establishing a full-time presence and opening an immigration court in the DHS contract detention facility in Aurora, Colorado on 5/31/16. Notice includes contact information.

5/17/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051804. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Finds Petitioner Is Not Eligible for Velasquez Exception to Lawyer’s Concessions

The court upheld the BIA where the petitioner’s first lawyer had conceded that petitioner’s 1993 California conviction for possessing counterfeit prescription blanks was a CIMT, and his second lawyer did not ask the BIA to relieve him of that concession. (Guzman-Rivadeneira v. Lynch, 5/13/16)

5/13/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051902. Crimes, Ethics, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Practice Resources

Practice Alert: Military Parole in Place and Removal Proceedings

AILA’s ICE Liaison Committee provides a practice alert advising members of the procedure for seeking military parole in place if your client is currently in removal proceedings or previously has been ordered removed from the United States.

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Remands Where BIA Failed to Address IJ’s Seemingly Inconsistent Credibility Findings

The court held that the BIA erred in failing to address the IJ’s seemingly inconsistent credibility findings where the petitioner was charged as removable under INA §212(a)(6)(E)(i) for allegedly participating in an alien smuggling attempt. (Perez-Arceo v. Lynch, 5/12/16)

5/12/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051860. Crimes, Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Press Releases

CARA: Government Continues to Undermine Access to Counsel and Due Process for Children and Mothers Seeking Protection in the U.S.

The CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project shared additional evidence that the federal government and private prison companies are failing to provide child care adequate to ensure access to counsel and meaningful representation as a Texas agency considers licensing the Dilley center.

5/12/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051203. Asylum & Refugees, Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
AILA Public Statements, Press Releases

AILA: Shameful Escalation of ICE Raids is Misdirected at Vulnerable Families and Engenders a Culture of Fear

Responding to confirmed reports that immigration authorities are planning another surge of arrests aimed at families and unaccompanied children across the nation, AILA President Victor Nieblas Pradis joined AILA Executive Director Benjamin Johnson in condemning the raids.

Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Cautions IJs over Finding Relief Applications Abandoned

Unpublished BIA decision states that while immigration judges may deem applications abandoned if not timely submitted, such decisions must be balanced against due process concerns that respondents have a full and fair hearing. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Ramirez Ramos, 5/12/16)

5/12/16 AILA Doc. No. 16103100. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Dismisses Fraud-Related Aggravated Felony Charge

Unpublished BIA decision terminates proceedings because the evidence did not demonstrate that a restitution order exceeding $10,000 related to an offense involving fraud or deceit or to a separate conviction for grand theft. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Acevedo Solis, 5/11/16)

5/11/16 AILA Doc. No. 16102732. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Says It Lacks Jurisdiction to Review BIA’s Discretionary Denial of NACARA Special Rule Cancellation

The court granted the Attorney General’s motion to dismiss the petition for review, holding that it lacked jurisdiction pursuant to INA §242(a)(2)(B)(i) to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of NACARA special rule cancellation of removal. (Monroy v. Lynch, 5/11/16)

5/11/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051103. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Finds BIA Failed to Explain Why It Found That VAWA Relief Required Good Faith Marriage

The court held that the BIA failed to articulate a sufficient explanation as to why it determined that the petitioner was required to prove that hers was a good faith marriage in order to be eligible for VAWA relief. (Tillery v. Lynch, 5/11/16)

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Finds Petitioner’s Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim Did Not Comply with Lozada Requirements

The court dismissed in part and denied in part the petition for review, holding that there is no “plain on the face of the administrative record” exception in favor of a case-by-case assessment of whether BIA’s application of Matter of Lozada was arbitrary. (García v. Lynch, 5/9/16)

5/9/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051101. Ethics, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

USCIS Comment Period on Form I-191

USCIS 60-day notice of a comment request period on proposed revisions to the Application for Relief Under Former Section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (Form I-191). Comments are due by 7/8/16. (81 FR 28097, 5/9/16)

5/9/16 AILA Doc. No. 16050901. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA Amicus to BIA on Prostitution as a CIMT

The AILA Amicus Committee filed an amicus brief with the BIA, arguing that simple prostitution is not categorically a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT).

5/6/16 AILA Doc. No. 16071113. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Says Circumstance-Specific Approach Applies to Limiting Components of INA §101(a)(43)(T)

The BIA held that the circumstance-specific approach is the appropriate inquiry for assessing the limiting components of INA §101(a)(43)(T), which defines aggravated felony “failure to appear” convictions. Matter of Garza-Olivares, 26 I&N Dec. 736 (BIA 2016)

5/5/16 AILA Doc. No. 16050506. Crimes, Removal & Relief

AILA Quicktake #165: Texas Approves Karnes Childcare License

AILA member and head of the immigration clinic at the University of Texas Law School Denise Gilman shares news of the Texas Department of Family Services' decision to approve the Karnes City, Texas, application to be a licensed childcare facility and what AILA members can do.

5/5/16 AILA Doc. No. 16050509. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Finds INA §242(a)(2)(C) Limits Its Jurisdiction to Review Petitioner’s Claims

The court held that the IJ and BIA properly found that the petitioner, who was convicted of burglary in Illinois, was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT), and thus that INA §242(a)(2)(C) applied and limited the court’s scope of review. (Dominguez-Pulido v. Lynch, 5/5/16)

5/5/16 AILA Doc. No. 16051030. Crimes, Removal & Relief