Featured Issues

Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE

2/3/25 AILA Doc. No. 25010904. Removal & Relief

This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.

Quick Links

Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs

The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.

Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.

Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.

*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.

Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion

Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.

An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:

  • National security or public safety threats;
  • Those with criminal convictions;
  • Gang members;
  • Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
  • Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.

Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.

Access to Counsel

Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients

Selected ICE Policies and Current Status

For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.

Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status Current Status
  • Unclear but attorneys should proceed with extreme caution in pursuing any relief under this process.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • No recission has been announced.
  • The 2021 Victim Centered Approach Memo and the 2011 Prosecutorial Discretion for Victims and Witness have allegedly been rescinded though no public updated guidance available at the time of this updated. Media reports suggest that the requirements of 1367 protections should still be followed.
  • No recission has been announced.
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
776 - 800 of 12,965 collection items
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Rules on Transcript of a Plea Colloquy

The BIA dismissed the appeal and held that under the modified categorical approach, an Immigration Judge may consider the transcript of a plea colloquy in determining the factual basis of a plea. Matter of Cancinos-Mancio, 28 I&N Dec. 708 (BIA 2023)

4/28/23 AILA Doc. No. 23050503. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Liaison Minutes

AILA Key Takeaways from the Spring Conference Open Forum with EOIR

AILA’s EOIR National Liaison Committee provides key takeaways from the open forum with EOIR at AILA’s Spring Conference.

4/28/23 AILA Doc. No. 23051007. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Upholds Cancellation Denial to Petitioner Who Had Been Convicted of Battery Against the Mother of His Daughter in Wisconsin

The court found that petitioner’s conviction in Wisconsin for battery arising from an attack on the mother of his daughter was a crime of violence, and that he had not shown the absence of a disqualifying conviction under INA §237(a)(2)(E)(i). (De Jesus Caldera-Torres v. Garland, 4/27/23)

4/27/23 AILA Doc. No. 23060505. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Crimes, Removal & Relief
Liaison Minutes

AILA Key Takeaways from Spring Conference Open Forum with BIA

AILA’s EOIR National Liaison Committee provides key takeaways from the open forum with the BIA at AILA’s Spring Conference.

4/26/23 AILA Doc. No. 23051005. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR Announces Appointment of Sheila McNulty as Chief Immigration Judge

EOIR announced the appointment of Sheila McNulty as the Chief Immigration Judge. Judge McNulty has served EOIR since 2010, including as part of the Office of the Chief Immigration Judge leadership for the past 6.5 years.

4/26/23 AILA Doc. No. 23050102. Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: Choice of Law in Removal Proceedings after Matter of Garcia

The ICE Committee provides a practice alert on Matter of Garcia, which addresses the increased use of video teleconference hearing and different geographic locations of the IJs, courts, and non-citizens as it relates to venue and what circuit court law to apply.

4/26/23 AILA Doc. No. 23042600. Removal & Relief
Liaison Minutes

AILA ICE Liaison Committee Meeting with ICE

AILA’s ICE Liaison Committee provides meeting minutes with ICE responses from the committee’s 4/26/23 liaison engagement with the agency. Topics include OPLA non-appearance, ERO check-in procedures, and related problems with Notices to Appear.

4/26/23 AILA Doc. No. 23033004. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA3 Finds Guatemalan Petitioner with SIJ Status Was Not Paroled for Purposes of Removal

The court found that the petitioner’s Special Immigrant Juvenile (SIJ) status did not exempt him from removal, reasoning that the plain language of INA §245(h)(2) shows that SIJ parole applies only for adjustment of status, not for purposes of removal. (Cortez-Amador v. Att’y Gen., 4/25/23)

4/25/23 AILA Doc. No. 23060104. Removal & Relief, Special Immigrant Juveniles
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Upholds CAT Denial to Bisexual Man and Former Gang Member Petitioner from Jamaica

The court found that petitioner, a bisexual man and former gang member, had not shown the requisite likelihood that he would be tortured if returned to his home country of Jamaica, and thus upheld the agency’s denial of his Convention Against Torture (CAT) claim. (Kerr v. Garland, 4/24/23)

4/24/23 AILA Doc. No. 23060202. Asylum, LGBTQ, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Upholds BIA’s Determination That Visa Fraud Waiver Could Not Overcome Grounds for Petitioners’ Removal

The court held that the visa fraud waiver did not reach the petitioners’ grounds for removal, that it lacked jurisdiction over the claims the BIA did not reach, and that the petitioners failed to show a violation of their due process rights. (Reese v. Garland, 4/24/23)

4/24/23 AILA Doc. No. 23060203. Admissions & Border, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Rejects Petitioner’s Argument That BIA Impermissibly Engaged in Factfinding in Characterizing His Criminal History

The court found that the BIA did not second-guess the IJ’s factual findings, but instead conducted a de novo reweighing of the equities based on the facts found by the IJ, and thus properly exercised its discretion to deny cancellation of removal. (Hernandez v. Garland, 4/21/23)

4/21/23 AILA Doc. No. 23042405. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Finds That Habeas Corpus Petitions Are Hybrid Actions for Purposes of the EAJA

Denying the appellants’ motion for attorney’s fees, the court held that habeas corpus petitions are not purely civil in nature but rather are hybrid actions, and therefore do not unequivocally fall under the text of the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). (Gomez Barco v. Garland, 4/20/23)

4/20/23 AILA Doc. No. 23042407. Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: Key Takeaways on the Credible Fear Interviews in Customs and Border Protection Custody

AILA provides a practice alert regarding DHS changes to how and when credible fear interviews occur for individuals processed under Title 8 expedited removal.

4/20/23 AILA Doc. No. 23042004. Admissions & Border, Asylum, Expedited Removal, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

ICE Launches Online CeBONDS Capability to Automate Bond Payments

ICE announced the implementation of Cash Electronic Bonds Online (CeBonds), a web-based system aimed to provide a fully automated online platform for requesting verification of bond eligibility, making cash immigration bond payments, and sending electronic notifications to cash bond obligors.

4/20/23 AILA Doc. No. 23042401. Detention & Bond, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

USCIS 60-Day Notice and Request for Comment on Proposed Revisions to Form I-212

USCIS 60-day notice and request for comment on proposed revisions to Form I-212, Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States after Deportation or Removal. Comments are due 6/20/23. (88 FR 23682, 4/18/23)

4/18/23 AILA Doc. No. 23041802. Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Pointer: Motions to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel

The EOIR Liaison Committee provides a practice pointer for attorneys moving to withdraw as counsel of record for cases pending in the EOIR system and respondents who may decide to change counsel.

4/17/23 AILA Doc. No. 23041701. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA3 Finds That IJ’s Consideration of Evidence Underlying Petitioner’s Expunged Charges Fell Within IJ’s Broad Discretion

The court held that the IJ did not err in concluding that the facts and circumstances surrounding the petitioner’s arrest, which included expunged criminal charges, presented serious adverse factors that worked against a favorable exercise of discretion. (Doyduk v. Att’y Gen., 4/14/23)

4/14/23 AILA Doc. No. 23042406. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA1 Upholds BIA’s Finding That Petitioner Had Not Entered into Marriage in Good Faith

The court held that substantial evidence supported the agency’s finding that petitioner had not entered into his marriage in good faith, where the evidence showed a severely limited commingling of assets and a dubious commitment to the marriage by both parties. (Alzaben v. Garland, 4/14/23)

4/14/23 AILA Doc. No. 23042402. Family Immigration, Family-Based Immigrants, Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: During Webex Hearings, All Parties Should be Clearly Visible on Camera

The EOIR Liaison Committee provides a practice alert on member concerns regarding judges having their courtroom cameras positioned in such a way that the judge’s face is not clearly visible during Webex hearings.

4/14/23 AILA Doc. No. 23041401. Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: EOIR Specialized Dockets

The EOIR Liaison Committee provides a practice alert on EOIR’s clarification that every immigration court has specialized dockets and that practitioners may seek engagement with local EOIR to determine when specialized dockets occur at particular immigration courts.

4/14/23 AILA Doc. No. 23041403. Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: Following Date and Time on NTA vs. Relying on ACIS/800#

The EOIR Liaison Committee provides a practice alert on member concerns on the Notice to Appear (“NTA”) that lists a hearing date and time and the 1-800 number used to determine whether they have a court hearing.

4/14/23 AILA Doc. No. 23041499. Removal & Relief
Practice Resources

Practice Alert: EOIR’s “Off Calendar” Notices

The EOIR Liaison Committee provides a practice alert on its “Off Calendar” initiative to address immigration court backlogs.

4/14/23 AILA Doc. No. 23041407. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

EOIR to Host Series of Stakeholder Meetings Regarding Pre-Hearing Conferences

EOIR invites stakeholders to meet with assistant chief immigration judges to discuss pre-hearing conferences for immigration court matters. Register for EOIR’s Stakeholder listserv for those details coming soon. EOIR plans to host 28 meetings on this topic between April 17 and May 25, 2023.

4/13/23 AILA Doc. No. 23042001. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Remands Asylum Claim of Ukrainian Petitioner After Finding That Agency’s Adverse Credibility Determination Relied on Legal Error

The court held that the IJ’s adverse credibility finding was not supported by substantial evidence and that the IJ unjustifiably refused to allow the petitioner to present readily available witness testimony, thereby depriving him of a full and fair hearing. (Malets v. Garland, 4/14/23)

4/12/23 AILA Doc. No. 23042404. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Amicus Briefs/Alerts

AILA and Partners Submit Amicus Brief on Child Endangerment Statutes

AILA and partners submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Diaz-Rodriguez v, Garland on whether child endangerment statutes qualify as crimes of "child abuse, child neglect, or child abandonment" under INA 237(a)(2)(E)(i) and urge the Court to grant certiorari in this case.

4/10/23 AILA Doc. No. 23060704. Removal & Relief