Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
BIA Reverses IJ’s Discretionary Denial of Asylum in Somali FGM Case
Unpublished BIA decision sustains the appeal, reverses the IJ’s discretionary denial of asylum, and concludes respondent met her burden of proof for asylum based on FGM and merits relief as a matter of discretion. Courtesy of Kimberly Hunter.
BIA Remands For Evidentiary Hearing Regarding Failure to Receive Hearing Notice
Unpublished BIA decision remands for evidentiary hearing concerning non-receipt of hearing notice where Notice To Appear and in absentia removal order were returned as undeliverable. (Matter of Szypulski, 12/30/13) Special thanks to IRAC
BIA Upholds “Reason to Believe” Finding Against Suspected Drug Dealer
Unpublished BIA decision finds “reason to believe” in INA 212(a)(2)(C) is akin to “probable cause,” and upholds the finding of inadmissibility based on drug-related arrest and invocation of Fifth Amendment. (Matter of Isabel Diaz, 12/30/13) Special thanks to IRAC
BIA Remands After 90-Day Filing Window Due to Totality of Circumstances
Unpublished BIA decision remands even though respondent’s motion was untimely filed, as respondent received inaccurate information from DHS officials regarding how to proceed and the new counsel obtained conviction records not previously in the record. Courtesy of Haitham Ballout.
BIA Denies §245(i) Adjustment Application Due to Improper Labor Certification Filing
Unpublished BIA decision upholds denial of adjustment application under INA 245(i) because the underlying labor certification was filed in the wrong state. (Matter of Anwar, 12/30/13) Special thanks to IRAC.
BIA Finds Retraction of False Citizenship Claim Not Made Voluntarily and Without Delay
Unpublished BIA decision finds retraction of false claim to U.S. citizenship after presentation of evidence of French citizenship was not made “voluntarily and without delay.” (Matter of Martin, 12/27/13) Special thanks to IRAC.
CRS Report on Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Enforcement
Congressional Research Service (CRS) report on prosecutorial discretion in immigration enforcement including how it is applied and potential limits on the exercise of discretion.
CA4 Denies Petition to Review Forced Sterilization Claim
The court denied the petition to review the denial of asylum and withholding, finding that the adverse credibility finding relating to petitioner’s claim that he would be sterilized in China instead of his wife was supported by substantial evidence. (Pan v. Holder, 12/17/13)
BIA Finds Hand-Written IJ Decision Not Sufficient for Appellate Review
Unpublished BIA decision remands for further consideration of motion to reopen because IJ’s hand-written decision stating that the “court courts with the position of DHS” was not sufficient for meaningful appellate review. (Matter of Ibrahim, 12/26/13) Special thanks to IRAC.
CA9 on BIA’s “Place-of-Filing” Rule
The court vacated and remanded, holding that the BIA’s “place-of-filing” rule is a procedural claims-processing rule, not a jurisdictional bar to the BIA’s authority to consider a motion to reopen. (Hernandez v. Holder, 12/24/13)
BIA Considers Appeal on Merits After Removal of Respondent
Unpublished BIA decision finds that respondent’s removal while the appeal of the denial of his motion to reopening was pending did not represent a “departure” under 8 CFR 1003.4 constituting a withdrawal of the appeal. (Matter of Amparo Abreu, 12/24/13) Special thanks to IRAC.
CA1 Denies Asylum to Chinese Petitioner
The court denied the petition to review, finding that petitioner did not establish past persecution, future persecution, nor a clear probability of future torture, based on his wife’s forced sterilization in China. (Wu v. Holder, 12/23/13)
CA1 Upholds Asylum Denial for Christian from Nigeria
The court dismissed the motion to reopen as untimely and denied the motion to reconsider, finding no evidence of legal error, nor abuse of discretion. (Saka v. Holder, 12/23/13)
CA1 Upholds Asylum Denial for Greek Petitioner from Albania
The court denied the claim for asylum, upholding the IJ and BIA conclusions that improved conditions in Albania rebutted the petitioner’s presumption of a well-founded fear of persecution based on either his democratic political opinion or Greek ethnicity. (Ruci v. Holder, 12/23/13)
Amicus Brief on Not Adopting a Broad Reading of “Misdemeanor Crime of Domestic Violence”
Amicus brief filed by ASISTA, IDP, ILRC, National Immigration Project, and WDA, urging the Supreme Court that a ruling reversing the Court of Appeals based on a broad reading of “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” could have profound effects on immigration law.
AILA Amicus Brief on Reopening Reinstated Removal Orders
AILA amicus brief urging CA7 to rehear Cordova-Soto en banc, and arguing that reopening reinstated removal orders should be permitted in cases where the original removal order was entered in violation of law or otherwise represents a gross miscarriage of justice.
EOIR Announces New Facebook Account
EOIR notice on 12/20/13 announcing that EOIR has opened a Facebook account as a second media channel to receive updates. The EOIR website will continue to be the agency’s primary source of information online.
BIA Finds Vacatur of Criminal Conviction May Warrant Reopening of In Absentia Order
Unpublished BIA decisions remands for further consideration of motion to reopen challenging entry of in absentia order following vacatur of underlying criminal conviction. (Matter of Eustate, 12/20/13) Special thanks to IRAC
Amicus Practice Pointer: §245(i) Adjustment of Status After Garfias-Rodriguez
AILA Amicus Committee practice pointer on how to successfully advocate for §245(i) adjustment of status after the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Garfias-Rodriguez v. Holder. Special thanks to Stephen Manning and Megan Kent.
AILA Quicktake #64: Obama Administration Removal Numbers Misleading
In this Quicktake, AILA Advocacy Director Greg Chen discusses the recent removal numbers that Bloomberg reported in the press and how the decline is misleading when viewed from the macro perspective.
ICE FY2013 Removal Numbers
The 12/19/13 Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) annual report on FY2013 ICE immigration removals.
CA1 Upholds Asylum Denial for Chinese Christian
The court upheld the BIA’s conclusion that petitioner failed to establish prima facie eligibility for relief because the evidence in the motion to reopen did not show a reasonable likelihood that he would be individually targeted in China based upon his religion. (Wu v. Holder, 12/18/13)
CA2 Denies Asylum to Pro-Democracy Petitioners from China
The court denied the petitions for review, concluding there was insufficient evidence to suggest that the Chinese authorities would become aware of the petitioners’ pro-democracy activities while in the U.S. or that they would be targeted on that basis. (Y.C. v. Holder, 12/18/13)
Immigration Policy Center’s Perspectives on Immigration Detainers
Immigration Policy Center’s Perspectives on the faulty legal arguments behind immigration detainers.
USCIS Request for Comments on Proposed Revisions to DACA Form I-821D (Updated 12/24/13)
USCIS 60-day request for comments on proposed revisions to Form I-821D, Consideration of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), adding the ability to apply to renew DACA. Comments are due 2/18/14. Correction issued on 12/24/13. (78 FR 77696, 12/24/13) (78 FR 76637, 12/18/13)