Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
CA5 Finds Texas Conviction for Assault Is CIMT
The court upheld the BIA’s determination that the petitioner’s conviction for assault under Texas Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1) was a CIMT because it was an intentional assault that caused physical injury. (Esparza-Rodriguez v. Holder, 10/18/12)
CA7 Denies Mexican Asylum and CAT Relief Claim
The court denied or dismissed three consolidated petitions for review filed by the Mexican petitioner, holding that it had no jurisdiction to review one petition and that the petitioner was not entitled to asylum or CAT relief. (Cruz-Mayaho v. Holder, 10/17/12)
ICE Public Advocate Voice Newsletter, October 2012 (Issue 2)
ICE October 2012 Public Advocate Voice newsletter announcing expansion of the deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA) hotline into a new ICE Community Hotline, a profile on Women’s Refugee Commission, and information on visitation requests for detainees at ICE facilities.
AILA/USCIS Field Operations Liaison Q&As (10/16/12)
USCIS Field Operations official Q&As from a meeting with AILA on 10/4/12. Topics include NSEERS guidance, NTA issuance, RFE vs. NOID vs. denial, G-28s, biometrics, expedited advance parole, termination of conditional resident status, and more.
CA7 Holds IJ and BIA Erred in Considering 212(h) Waiver
The court held that the IJ and BIA relied on improper evidence in determining that the petitioner failed to exhibit rehabilitation, and that they overlooked material evidence related to the potential hardship his USC wife would suffer. (Lam v. Holder, 10/16/12)
CA2 Finds No Jurisdiction to Review Vacated BIA Order
The court held that the petition for review was moot because the court cannot provide effective relief from an order of removal that was vacated and replaced by an order that relied on materially different reasoning. (Fuller v. BIA, 10/16/12)
CA2 Temporarily Stays Review of Removal Cases
The court suspended action on removal cases in order for ICE to determine which cases are low priority under ICE guidelines or whether there are other reasons that ICE would be unlikely to promptly effect removal. (In the Matter of Immigration, 10/16/12)
AAO Finds Extreme Hardship, Reverses Waiver Denials
AAO approved the I-601 and I-212 waivers, finding the factors including hardship to the applicant’s USC wife and non-qualifying family members outweighed his use of fraudulent documents and unlawful presence. Courtesy of Russell Abrutyn.
DHS/EOIR MOA Regarding the Sharing of Information on Immigration Cases
Memorandum of Agreement between DHS and DOJ EOIR, signed in October 2012, regarding the sharing of information on immigration cases including clarification on the authority for DHS and EOIR to exchange immigration case data.
CA7 Upholds Ortego-Cabrera on Good Moral Character for Cancellation of Removal
The court held cancellation applicants must show good moral character in the 10 years immediately preceding a final administrative decision, and found the petitioner’s recent incarceration barred him from qualifying. (Duron-Ortiz v. Holder, 10/15/12, amended 11/6/12)
CA7 Finds It Has Jurisdiction Over Naturalization Case
The court held that the district court has jurisdiction to review a naturalization denial and issue a declaratory judgment while removal proceedings are pending, noting USCIS acted on the application before DHS began proceedings. (Klene v. Napolitano, 10/12/12)
USCIS Data on DACA Cases Received Through October 10, 2012
USCIS statistics on DACA cases from 8/15/12 to 10/10/12 which shows a total of 179,794 accepted DACA requests for processing, 158,408 biometric services appointments scheduled, 6,416 requests under review, and 4,591 requests approved.
CA1 Finds Prospect of CIR Is Not Good Cause for Continuance
The court upheld the IJ's and BIA’s decisions not to grant a continuance, finding that the prospect of comprehensive immigration reform was a speculative event that was insufficient to justify another continuance. (Sheikh v. Holder, 10/10/12)
New Jersey District Court on Mandatory Detention Under 236(c)
A New Jersey district court held that the “when released” language found in the mandatory detention provisions of INA § 236(c) mean that detention must occur immediately after release from criminal custody. Courtesy of Paul Grotas. (Charles v. Shanahan, 10/9/12)
CA9 Holds California Conviction for Attempted Kidnapping is Crime of Violence
The court held that the petitioner’s California conviction for attempted kidnapping is an aggravated felony, because under the statute, kidnapping presents a substantial risk of force and is thus a categorical crime of violence. (Delgado-Hernandez v. Holder, 10/9/12)
Practice Alert: The Correct I-765 Eligibility Category Under DACA
USCIS reminds stakeholders to use the correct eligibility category on Form I-765 for work authorizations under DACA, which is not the same eligibility category as work authorizations under regular deferred action.
ICE Memo on Prosecutorial Discretion for Long-Term, Same-Sex Partners
An ICE memo dated 10/5/12 clarifying how prosecutorial discretion should apply to family relationships involving long-term, same-sex partners, including information on which same-sex relationships “rise to the level of family relationships.”
U.S. Citizen Wrongfully Deported to Mexico Settles with Case
ACLU blog post about an American citizen with mental disabilities who was wrongfully detained by ICE and deported to Mexico, on settling his case against the federal government for $175,000.
Additional USCIS Data on DACA Cases Received Through 9/12/12
USCIS statistics on DACA cases from 8/15/12 to 9/12/12, including the number of cases received by each lockbox, rejected by each lockbox, accepted by state of residence, and accepted by country of birth, as well as the number of biometrics appointments scheduled.
BIA Remands Case to Determine Whether Asylum Applicant Could Have Relocated
The BIA remanded the asylum case to the IJ to determine whether the respondent could avoid future persecution by relocating to another part of Sri Lanka, and whether it would be reasonable to expect him to do so. Matter of M-Z-M-R-, 26 I&N Dec. 28 (BIA 2012)
CA9 Finds BIA Used Incorrect Standard to Review CAT Claim
The court held that the BIA failed to apply a “clear error” standard of review when it overruled the IJ’s grant of CAT protection, noting that the BIA “failed to grapple with the evidentiary record.” (Ridore v. Holder, 10/3/12)
CA10 Denies CAT Relief to Homosexual Applicant from Mexico
The court found that, while the petitioner had established past persecution on account of his homosexuality, DHS proved that changed circumstances in Mexico meant that the petitioner’s life would not be threatened if he were removed. (Neri-Garcia v. Holder, 10/3/12)
CA1 Denies Asylum to Applicant Whose Spouse Was Forced to Undergo an Abortion
The court held that the husband of a Chinese woman who was forced to undergo an abortion is not automatically "a person who has been forced to abort a pregnancy” under INA §101(a)(42)(B), and denied the petitioner’s asylum application. (Dong v. Holder, 10/3/12)
AILA/USCIS HQ Liaison Q&As (10/9/12)
Official minutes of the 10/9/12, AILA liaison meeting with USCIS HQ. Topics include transition to paperless I-94, processing times, Entrepreneurs in Residence, H-1B “specialty occupation,” Adam Walsh Act, ability to pay, physical therapists, NTAs for TPS denials, and more.
United States and Mexico Begin “Interior Repatriation Initiative”
ICE press release on the beginning of the Interior Repatriation Initiative (IRI), a new U.S.-Mexico pilot to provide humane, safe and orderly repatriation of Mexican nationals to the interior of Mexico and ultimately to their hometowns, not to towns on the U.S.-Mexico border.