Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE
This resource page combines resources for attorneys representing clients before ICE. For information about why AILA is calling for the reduction and phasing out of immigration detention, please see our Featured Issue Page: Immigration Detention and Alternatives to Detention.
Quick Links
- Seeking Stays of Removal
- AILA Practice Pointers and Alerts (continually updated)
- Practice Advisory: Representing Detained Clients in the Virtual Landscape
- Practice Pointer: How to Locate Clients Apprehended by ICE
- Practice Pointer: Preparing for an Order of Supervision Appointment with ICE-ERO
- AILA ICE Liaison Agenda and Meeting Minutes
Communicating with OPLA, ERO, and CROs
The Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) includes 1300 attorneys who represent the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in immigration removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). OPLA litigates all removal cases as well as provides legal counsel to ICE personnel. At present, there are 25 field locations throughout the United States.
Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) manages all aspects of immigration enforcement from arrest, detention, and removal. ERO has 24 field office locations. ERO also manages an “alternative to detention” program that relies almost exclusively on the “Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)” to monitor individuals in removal proceedings.
Since 2016, ICE has had an Office of Partnership and Engagement (formerly Office of Community Engagement) to be a link between the agency and stakeholders. As part of this office, Community Relations Officers (CROS) are assigned to every field office to work with local stakeholders such as attorneys and nonprofit organizations.
*Headquarters does not provide direct contact numbers or emails for individual employees.* (AILA Liaison Meeting with ICE on April 26, 2023)(AILA Doc. No. 23033004). However, attorneys can contact Chapter Local ICE Liaisons as they may have this information provided to them via local liaison engagement.
- DHS/ICE/OPLA Chief Counsel Contact Information [last updated in 2024, this list no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- Contact Information for Local OPLA Offices [last updated in 2024, this information no longer appears on ICE.gov as of 1/27/25]
- ERO Field Offices Contact Information*
- OPE Community Relations Officers
- ICE Check-In Scheduling Website
- ICE Online Change of Address Website
Latest on Enforcement Priorities & Prosecutorial Discretion
Executive Order 14159 (90 FR 8443, 1/29/25) directs DHS to set priorities that protect the public safety and national security interests of the American people, including by ensuring the successful enforcement of final orders of removal, enforcement of the INA and other Federal laws related to the illegal entry and unlawful presence of [noncitizens] in the United States and the enforcement of the purposes of this order. Given the January 25, 2025, confirmation of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, a memorandum detailing enforcement priorities may be issued in the coming weeks.
An unpublished ICE memo from acting ICE Director Caleb Vitello entitled “Interim Guidance: Civil Immigration Enforcement Actions in or near Courthouses” makes reference to targeted noncitizens and includes:
- National security or public safety threats;
- Those with criminal convictions;
- Gang members;
- Those who have been ordered removed from the United States but have failed to depart; and/or
- Those who have re-entered the country illegally after being removed.
Procedures and email inboxes created under the Biden Administration to request Prosecutorial Discretion no longer appear on the ICE website. AILA members are encouraged to review current DOJ regulations entitled “Efficient Case and Docket Management in Immigration Proceedings” for alternative basis for seeking termination or administrative closure.
Access to Counsel
- ERO eFile:
- An online system developed to electronically file G-28s with ERO. Attorneys and accredited representatives may register for ERO eFile accounts and may also sponsor law students and law graduates who work under their supervision. See AILA’s practice alert (AILA Doc. No. 24051506) for more information.
- ICE Attorney Information and Resources Page
- AILA Practice Alert: Updates to the ICE Attorney Information and Resource Page
Filing Administrative Complaints on Behalf of Detained and Formerly Detained Clients
- Online Intake Form for the Detention Ombudsman (myOIDO)
- Available for complaints for issues in ICE and CBP Custody nationwide, including to submit complaints about access to counsel problems on behalf of currently or previously detained clients.
- Online Complaint Form for DHS Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL)
- Oversight of Immigration Detention: An Overview - May 16, 2022
(provides a list of agencies with which attorneys may file administrative complaints of detention center violations) - Immigration Judge Complaint Toolkit – August 31, 2022
- Practice Alert: Template for CRCL Complaint Regarding Failures to Provide Language Access – July 16, 2021
Selected ICE Policies and Current Status
For comprehensive comparison of current and prior ICE policies, please review the “Immigration Policy Tracker (IPTP).” The IPTP is a project of Professor Lucas Guttentag working with teams of Stanford and Yale law students and leading national immigration experts.
| Pre Jan 20, 2025 Status | Current Status |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Browse the Featured Issue: Representing Clients Before ICE collection
INS Instructions on HRIFA/NACARA-Eligible Persons
A 3/31/00 memo from Michael Pearson, Executive Associate Commissioner (INS) stating that in view of pending legislation that could extend NACARA and HRIFA filing deadlines, INS will "hold off" removal for those who could have been eligible had they filed on time.
BIA on Pre-Hearing Voluntary Departure
The BIA held that voluntary departure may not be granted prior to the completion of removal proceedings without an express waiver of the right to appeal by the alien or the alien’s representative. (Matter of Ocampo-Ugalde, 3/24/00)
BIA Finds Firearm Offense Does Not Cut Off Continuous Residence for Cancellation
The BIA held that a firearms offense that renders an alien removable under INA §237(a)(2)(C) is not one “referred to in §212(a)(2)” and thus does not stop the accrual of continuous residence or physical presence for purposes of cancellation of removal. (Matter of Campos-Torres, 3/21/00)
INS Interpretation of Detention & Release Provisions
INS General Counsel addresses the circumstances under which non-criminal, criminal and 'terrorist' aliens subject to final removal orders should be detained. The impact of delay of removal periods is among the topics discussed.
EOIR/AILA Liaison Minutes (3/30/00)
Minutes from the AILA/EOIR Liaison Meeting on 3/30/00. Topics include difference between "in re" and "matter of", repapering initiatives, temporary Board members, update on the appeal streaming regulations, instructions on updating attorney address or withdrawing representation, and oral arguments.
BIA Upholds Decision to Detain Respondent Post-Order
The BIA upheld the district director’s determination to continue post-deportation order detention, after holding that it had jurisdiction over the respondent’s appeal, and that the respondent was eligible for release under INA §241(a)(6). (Matter of Saelee, 2/25/00)
BIA Says Service of OSC Stops Physical Presence
The BIA held that an alien may not accrue continuous physical presence for suspension of deportation after service of the order to show cause and notice of hearing. (Matter of Mendoza-Sandino, 2/23/00)
Changes to Seattle Immigration Court Procedures Proposed
EOIR proposes to alter the Seattle local operating procedures by requiring leave from court to file documents in excess of 150 pages per family unit.
BIA on Burden of Proof in Motions to Reopen
The BIA held that where an alien has filed an untimely motion to reopen alleging that the INS failed to prove removability, the burden of proof shifts to the alien to demonstrate that an exceptional situation exists to warrant the BIA to reopen on its own motion. (Matter of Beckford, 1/19/00)
INS Use of Prosecutorial Discretion to Avoid Harsh Consequences of IIRAIRA
A 1/19/00 letter from Robert Raben, Assistant Attorney General (INS) regarding the INS' use of prosecutorial discretion to avoid the harsh consequences of IIRAIRA.
AILA Lacks Standing to Challenge IIRAIRA
DC Circuit holds that AILA and other organizational plaintiffs lack standing to challenge expedited removal provisions of IIRAIRA and implementing regulations. (AILA v. Reno, 1/11/00)
BIA Interprets "Permanently Ineligible for Citizenship"
The BIA held that an alien convicted of an aggravated felony is not inadmissible under INA §212(a)(8)(A) as an alien who is permanently ineligible for citizenship and that 212(a)(8)(A) only encompasses those barred from naturalization for evasion of military service. (Matter of Kanga, 1/7/00)
BIA Finds Writ of Error Coram Nobis Warrants Termination of Proceedings
In an unpublished decision, the BIA held that respondent's success in obtaining a writ of error coram nobis which reduced his sentence for conspiracy to commit robbery from 366 days to 10 months warranted termination of proceedings. (Matter of Corso, 12/29/99)
Error Coram Nobis Writ to Avoid IIRAIRA Impact
The SDNY granted a writ of error coram nobis to reduce a prison term from a year and a day to the 10 months served, specifically for the purpose of avoiding IIRAIRA's retroactive impact on what is now considered an aggravated felony. (U.S. v. Ko,)
CA9 Rebuffs Soriano
The court refused to follow Soriano, holding that AEDPA §440(d) does not apply to deportation cases pending when AEDPA was passed, and that AEDPA and IIRAIRA do not repeal habeas relief under 28 USC §2241. (Magana-Pizano v. INS, 12/27/99)
BIA Says Arizona Aggravated DUI Is a CIMT
The BIA held that a conviction under Arizona law for an aggravated DUI, which requires knowledge that the driver is prohibited from driving, is a crime involving moral turpitude. (Matter of Lopez-Meza, 12/21/99)
BIA Press Release on BIA Practice Manual
The BIA has issued three new publications to provide basic information to individuals involved in immigration proceedings and to answer FAQs about how the appeals process works at the Board.
BIA on Interpreting the Aggravated Felony Definition
The BIA held that where an appellate court interprets the aggravated felony definition for purposes of a criminal sentence enhancement, the BIA may interpret it differently for purposes of implementing the immigration laws in cases arising within that circuit. (Matter of K-V-D-, 12/10/99)
INS General Counsel List of Resolved Issues
The INS General Counsel has provided a list of 21 issues that have been resolved through AILA liaison. Among other things, various unlawful presence and 245(i) questions are addressed.
INS General Counsel Opines on Administrative Closure
A 12/7/99 memo from Bo Cooper, General Counsel (INS) providing guidance on administrative closure of proceedings for non-permanent residents eligible for repapering.
BIA Says "Reasonable Cause" Standard Applies to MTR In Absentia Proceedings
The BIA held that when an alien seeks to reopen in absentia proceedings, it is appropriate to apply the "reasonable cause" standard, not the "exceptional circumstances" standard set forth in INA §242B. (Matter of Cruz-Garcia, 11/30/99)
BIA on Confidentiality of SAW Applications
The BIA held that information provided in an application to adjust an alien’s status to that of a lawful temporary resident under INA §210 is confidential and prohibited from use in rescission proceedings under INA §246. (Matter of Masri, 11/30/99)
EOIR Report: Evaluation of the Rights Presentation
During FY1998, the EOIR funded a short-term pilot project designed to augment the due process information detainees receive from immigration judges. Three nonprofit organizations provided daily “rights presentations” to INS detainees. This report provides a summary of the evaluation findings.
BIA on Change in Law as Basis for Sua Sponte Reopening
The BIA held that in order for a change in law to qualify as exceptional situation meriting sua sponte reopening or reconsideration, the change must be fundamental in nature and not merely an incremental development. (Matter of G-D-, 11/23/99)
AILA/AILF Submit Comments on Expedited Removal Regulations
AILA, AILF, and other groups submit comments to INS on its planned pilot program authorizing expedited removal of certain aliens incarcerated in three Texas facilities.