Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
DOJ OIL May 2016 Litigation Bulletin
The DOJ OIL Immigration Litigation Bulletin for May 2016, with articles on Torres v. Lynch and the Adverse Credibility Project, as well as summaries of circuit court decisions for May 2016.
DOD Fact Sheet on MAVNI Recruitment Pilot Program
DOD fact sheet on the Military Accessions Vital to National Interest (MAVNI) recruitment pilot program. To determine its value in enhancing military readiness, the limited pilot program will recruit up to 5,200 people in FY2016, and will continue through September 30, 2016.
BIA Provides Additional Opportunity to Comply with Biometrics Requirement
Unpublished BIA decision finds respondent who forgot to submit fingerprints should receive another opportunity to comply with the biometrics requirements and present her asylum application. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of L-H-A-, 4/29/16)
BIA Remands Record Due to Insufficient Evidence of Offense of Conviction
Unpublished BIA decision remands record because DHS submitted only a computer printout of the respondent’s conviction in support of the charge of deportability that did not list the elements of the offense. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Martinez, 4/29/16)
Sign-On Letter to Attorney General Lynch on Appointing Counsel to Children
On 4/29/16, AILA joined faith-based, human rights, and immigrants’ rights groups in urging Attorney General Loretta Lynch to halt the practice of pursuing deportation proceedings against children who do not have counsel and to guarantee that every child facing deportation is provided legal counsel.
Written Testimony from ICE Director Sarah Saldana on Criminal Aliens
Written testimony from Sarah Saldana, Director of ICE, for the 4/28/16 hearing “Criminal Aliens Released by the Department of Homeland Security” before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, where she discussed ICE enforcement and removal operations.
CA8 Upholds Asylum Denial to Mexican Family Who Feared Persecution of Matazetas Gang
The court held that the petitioners, who claimed that the Matazetas gang would persecute them if they were returned to Mexico, failed to show that the government of Mexico either condoned the conduct or was unable to protect the victims. (Saldana v. Lynch, 4/28/16)
H. Res. 708
On 4/27/16, Representatives Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), Keith Ellison (D-MN), and Judy Chu (D-CA) introduced a resolution to repeal specific provisions of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA).
CA4 Finds Receipt of Embezzled Property Is Not Categorically an Aggravated Felony
The court found that the BIA erred in concluding that the petitioner was an aggravated felon who was ineligible for cancellation of removal, holding that a conviction for receipt of embezzled property is not an INA aggravated felony under the categorical approach. (Mena v. Lynch, 4/27/16)
CA5 Says Former Informants Do Not Constitute a Particular Social Group
The court denied the petition for review, finding that the petitioner's proposed social group of former informants against the Zetas, a Mexican criminal syndicate, was not sufficiently particular as to constitute a particular social group (PSG). (Hernandez-De La Cruz v. Lynch, 4/26/16)
Board of Immigration Appeals Practice Manual
Updated version of the Board of Immigration Appeals Practice Manual, dated 4/26/16. Table of changes is listed on page 211.
CA1 Denies Petition for Review But Encourages Government to Exercise PD
The court upheld the IJ and BIA’s decision that petitioner was removable as “an alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled” under INA §212(a)(6)(A)(i), but encouraged the government to exercise prosecutorial discretion (PD) in this case. (Acosta v. Lynch, 4/22/16)
CA1 Finds Petitioner’s Maine Assault Conviction Was Not a “Crime of Violence”
On rehearing, the court vacated BIA’s decision and remanded, holding that under Moncrieffe v. Holder, the petitioner’s Maine assault conviction was not a “crime of violence,” and thus, he was eligible to seek cancellation of removal. (Peralta Sauceda v. Lynch, 4/22/16)
EOIR Swears in Two Immigration Judges
EOIR announced the investiture of two immigration judges (IJs). Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch appointed Kuyomars Golparvar as an IJ at the York Immigration Court and Robin J. Rosche as an IJ at the Chicago Immigration Court.
CA8 Says Petitioner's Convictions for Domestic Assault in Iowa Were Not Categorically CIMTs
The court held that the BIA erred in declining to review the petitioner's record of convictions for domestic abuse assault in Iowa under the modified categorical approach in order to determine whether he was convicted under a subsection that describes a CIMT. (Perez Alonzo v. Lynch, 4/22/16)
CA8 Finds Submission of I-751 Petition Was Overt Act in Furtherance of Marriage Fraud Conspiracy
The court held that the petitioner's submission of an I-751 petition constituted an overt act in furtherance of his conspiracy to commit marriage fraud, thereby extending his conspiracy crime to a date within five years of his admission to the United States. (Ashraf v. Lynch, 4/22/16)
BIA Remands Record Because Respondent Never Pleaded to the NTA
Unpublished BIA decision remands the record because the immigration judge did not require the respondent to plead to the allegations of fact and the charge of removability in the Notice to Appear. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Trujillo-Ma, 4/22/16)
AIM: The Benefits of DACA
In AILA's April Interview of the Month, DACA recipient and paralegal Alex Alvarado shares his story of how deferred action has impacted his life and why events like AILA's National Day of Action are important to continuing to push for immigration reform.
Blazing a Trail: The Fight for Right to Counsel in Detention and Beyond
The National Immigration Law Center published a report on representation for detained immigrants, titled “Blazing a Trail: The Fight for Right to Counsel in Detention and Beyond,” highlighting the work being done to secure a right to counsel in immigration court, especially for detained people.
CA5 Upholds Determination That Salvadoran Is Not Eligible to Adjust Status
The court upheld the BIA’s determination that the Salvadoran petitioner could not adjust his status to permanent resident, because he had not presented evidence sufficient to show that he had been lawfully admitted to the United States. (Gomez v. Lynch, 4/20/16)
Supreme Court Rules on Incorrect Use of Sentencing Guidelines in Illegal Re-Entry Case
The U.S. Supreme Court held that courts reviewing the use of an incorrect Guidelines range cannot apply a categorical "additional evidence" rule where a district court applied an incorrect range but sentenced the defendant within the correct range. (Molina-Martinez v. United States, 4/20/16)
BIA Orders Further Consideration of Continuance Denied During Off-the-Record Conversation
Unpublished BIA decision remands for further consideration and issuance of a written decision regarding a request for a continuance that the immigration judge denied during an off-the-record conversation. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Paz-Ochoa, 4/20/16)
CA11 Upholds Asylum Denial to Former Member of Honduran Gang
The court upheld the BIA's conclusion that the petitioner, a former member of the Mara-18 gang in Honduras, was not a member of a “particular social group” entitled to protection under INA §241(b)(3). (Gonzalez v. Att’y Gen., 4/19/16)
TRAC Report Find that In Six States, Immigration Relief Takes Over 1,000 Days on Average
A TRAC report found that despite the appointment of new immigration judges, the March 2016 Immigration Court backlog reached 486,206 pending cases. In FY2016, being granted relief took an average of more than 1,000 days in six states: New York, Arizona, Illinois, Nevada, California, and Ohio.
Webcast with the Experts: United States v. Texas
Watch AILA’s Director of Advocacy Greg Chen, American Immigration Council’s Legal Director Melissa Crow, and UCLA School of Law Professor Hiroshi Motomura as they recap and offer expert analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in the United States v. Texas case.