Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
BIA Reopens Proceedings Finding Respondent’s Confusion of Court Dates Rises to Exceptional Circumstances
Unpublished BIA decision the Board reopened proceedings upon finding the respondent’s confusion regarding the dates of his criminal and removal hearings constituted “exceptional circumstances” justifying his failure to appear. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Castellanos, 9/16/13)
BIA Grants Interlocutory Appeal, Terminates Proceedings
In this unpublished decision, the Board granted an interlocutory appeal from an IJ order denying the parties’ joint motion to terminate removal proceedings, and ordered the proceedings terminated so that the respondent could resume her naturalization application. Courtesy of John Gibson.
CA9 Holds DHS May Terminate Prior Grant of Withholding in Conjunction with Removal Proceedings
The court held that DHS may terminate a prior grant of withholding in conjunction with removal proceedings, so long as it meets its burden of demonstrating the grounds for doing so, and that two separate proceedings are not required under 8 CFR §1208.24(f). (Gutierrez v. Holder, 9/13/13)
BIA Upheld Denial of AOS Due To False Claims on I-9 Form
Unpublished BIA decision upholding denial of the respondent’s adjustment application because he signed an I-9 claiming to be a U.S. citizen or national and presented no evidence to support his claim that the I-9 was completed under duress. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Dakura, 9/13/13)
BIA Upholds DHS Motion to Terminate and Dismisses Respondent’s Appeal
Unpublished BIA decision where the Board upheld a grant of a DHS motion to terminate proceedings to reinstate a prior removal order against the respondent, rejecting his arguments that the underlying order should be set aside. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Aguilar-Perez, 9/13/13)
EOIR Headquarters Announces New Zip Code
EOIR alert that its headquarters in Falls Church, VA will begin processing mail through a new mail processing facility on 10/1/13. The street address will stay the same, but the zip code will change from 22041 to 20530. Mail addressed to the old zip code after 10/1/13 may be delayed.
CA5 Finds AAO, BIA, DHS Relied on Nonexistent Mexican Law in Removal Case
After noting that the AAO, the BIA, and DHS relied on a nonexistent Mexican law that out of wedlock children can only be legitimized by the subsequent marriage of their parents, the court found U.S. citizenship for the petitioner under §§ 301, 309 and remanded. (Saldana v. Holder, 9/11/13)
BIA Remands Due to Claims of Exception Circumstances and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
Unpublished BIA decision remanding for consideration of whether the filing deadline for the respondent’s untimely motion to reopen should be equitably tolled in light of the intervening decision in Avila-Santoya v. U.S. Att'y Gen. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Reece, 9/11/13)
USCIS Data on DACA Cases Received Through 8/31/13
USCIS statistics on DACA cases through 8/31/13, showing a total of 567,563 DACA requests accepted for processing, 555,958 biometric appointments scheduled, 455,455 requests approved, and 9,578 requests denied. 13,960 applications were accepted and 2,154 applications were denied in August 2013.
TRAC Report on the Nature of Charge in New Filings Seeking Removal Orders
Transactional Records Access Clearing House (TRAC) report demonstrating that only a small proportion of the filings in immigration courts seeking to deport noncitizens have been based on alleged criminal activity. Charts are updated with new data as it is available.
TRAC Report on New Filings Seeking Removal Orders
Transactional Records Access Clearing House (TRAC) report showing the number of new filings seeking removal orders in immigration courts. Charts are updated with new data as it is available.
CRS Report on Judicial Review of Immigration Matters
Congressional Research Service (CRS) report with an overview of judicial review of immigration matters, including visa denials and revocations, removal orders and detention, naturalization delays, expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens, expatriation, and legalization denials.
CA10 Denies Motion to Reopen for Guatemalan Asylum Seeker
In a nonprecedential decision, the court denied the petition for review, finding that the petitioner failed to explain how changed country conditions in Guatemala would permit an untimely and number barred motion to reopen. (Lopez v. Holder, 9/10/13)
EOIR Makes Changes to E-Registry Disclaimer
Based on concerns raised by AILA members, EOIR has changed the language of the disclaimer on the E-Registration log-in.
Unpublished BIA Case Granting AOS After Unauthorized Voting
The Board found that Keathley v. Holder is binding precedent in this case and that the holding of that case compels a conclusion that the respondent in this case is not inadmissible under section 212(a)(10)(D) and the grant of AOS was valid. Courtesy of Richard Hanus.
CA5 Remands Case for Anti-Maoist Asylum Seeker from Nepal
The court vacated and remanded, finding the BIA incorrectly required the petitioner to provide direct proof of the nexus between his persecution and his membership in Nepal’s Student Union, and did not consider all the evidence bearing upon the Maoists’ motives. (Sharma v. Holder, 9/9/13)
BIA Reopens Proceedings Due to DHS Mailing NTA to Improper Address
Unpublished BIA decision vacates an order of removal issued in absentia because respondent was not given notice of the hearing because the NTA was sent to prior address listed on an adjustment application filed years earlier. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Vazquez Ferrel, 9/9/13)
BIA Reopens Proceedings After Finding Respondent’s Claim Plausible For Not Receiving Notice
Unpublished BIA decision reopening proceedings, finding that the respondent’s diligence to attend prior hearings makes his claim that he did not receive notice of this hearing, and thus causing him to miss the hearing, plausible. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Boasiako, 9/9/13)
CA9 Finds it Lacks Jurisdiction to Review Somali Asylum Claim
Despite a mixed BIA decision, the court held it lacked jurisdiction to review the BIA’s underlying denial of asylum, the only issue raised in both petitions for review, because the petitioner failed to file a timely petition for review of that decision. (Abdisalan v. Holder, 9/6/13)
CA9 Remands After BIA Improperly Held Petitioner to Incorrect Legal Standard
The court granted petition for review and remanded after finding that the BIA improperly held that the motion to reopen was numerically barred, erred in restricting the evidence the Petitioner could provide, and erred in failing to consider the evidence tendered. (Zhao v. Holder, 9/6/13).
BIA Rescinds Removal Order After Notice Sent to Counsel But No Form EOIR-28 Was on Record
Unpublished BIA decision where the Board rescinded a removal order issued in absentia by finding the respondent was not properly notified of the removal hearing since the notice was mailed to counsel but there was not Form EOIR-28 on record. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Kyalo, 9/6/13)
BIA Remands After Record Is Unclear If Respondent Knowingly Waived Right to Appeal
Unpublished BIA decision remanding the case because the respondent was never asked to plead to his NTA and it is unclear from the record whether the respondent’s waiver of the right to appeal was made knowingly and intelligently. Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Lopez-Vasquez, 9/6/13)
BIA Remands After IJ Issued Form Order Adopting DHS Opposition Without Further Analysis
Unpublished BIA decision remanding the record for further consideration of the respondent's motion to reopen because IJ issued a form order stating, “Court adopts the DHS opposition as its own findings of fact and conclusions of law.” Special thanks to IRAC. (Matter of Martinez, 9/5/13)
DHS OIG Report with FY2013 Update on Performance of 287(g) Agreements
DHS OIG report with updated info on ICE efforts to address recommendations in prior reports on the performance of 287(g) agreements from FY2013. Report finds that all 64 recommendations from prior reports have been closed based on corrective action plans and supporting documentation provided by ICE.
CA1 Upholds Denial of MTR for Chinese Christian in Indonesia
The court found it was not an abuse of discretion for the BIA to deny the untimely motion, noting that although the petitioner submitted evidence of changed conditions in Indonesia, the information was available at the time of the hearing. (Lie v. Holder, 9/4/13)