Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0
The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.
Latest Updates
Updates from EOIR
Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
MPI Report on Executive Action to Make the Immigration System Work Better
A March 2011 Migration Policy Institute (MPI) report suggesting six ways executive action could be used to improve the performance of the U.S. immigration system, by building on policies of principal executive branch immigration agencies, without requiring new legislation.
VOICE: March/April 2011
The latest issue of VOICE: An Immigration Dialogue features articles on the Central American gang phenonemon, how to create a path to permanent residence through job creation, how to start your own immigration firm, and much more!
CA9 Remands, Finding No Retroactive Bar to §212(c) Under IIRIRA
The court held that Petitioner, who was a SAW lawful temporary resident when he pleaded guilty in 1989, had a settled expectation of the availability of §212(c) relief at the time of his plea. (Gallegos-Vasquez v. Holder, 3/1/11)
ICE Memo on Alternatives to Detention Program Participant Enrollment Guidance
Memo from Executive Associate Director Gary Mead on alternatives to detention program participant enrollment guidance for all existing and potential ADT participants.
AILA's Pro Bono Newsletter, Winter 2011
In the Winter 2011 Pro Bono Newsletter, get help in overcoming common obstacles to pro bono implementation and hear an Equal Justice Works fellow describe her experience working at a detention center in Texas.
CRS Report: U.S. Immigration Policy on Temporary Admissions
A 2/28/11 Congressional Research Service (CRS) report about U.S. immigration policy on temporary admissions covers policy tensions, nonimmigrant categories, periods of admission, work authorization, grounds for removal, visa and admission trends, and more.
ICE Announces Death of Chinese National in ICE Custody
ICE press release announcing the death of Qi Gen Guo, a Chinese national in ICE custody, who passed away at the Lock Haven Hospital in Lock Haven, PA, as the result of an apparent suicide. Qi Gen Guo is the sixth detainee to pass away in ICE custody in FY2011.
CA5 on IJ/BIA Jurisdiction Over Motions to Reopen
The court found that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in holding that Petitioner’s appeal from the IJ’s denial of her first motion to reopen deprived the IJ of jurisdiction to adjudicate a subsequent motion to reopen. (Lemus-Reyes v. Holder, 2/28/11)
CA7 Upholds Denial of Lebanese Asylum Claim
The court found that the IJ properly considered Petitioner’s Hezbollah-related claim, did not ignore his future persecution claims, and applied the correct standard of review in denying asylum. (Kiorkis v. Holder, 2/28/11)
CA2 Finds No Due Process Violation in Service of NTA on Minor
The court held that a defect in the service of a notice to appear on a minor alien under 8 CFR §103.5a(c)(2)(ii), standing alone, does not implicate the minor alien’s fundamental rights. (Nolasco v. Holder, 2/25/11)
CA2 on Illegal Entry and Reinstatement of Removal
The court upheld the reinstatement of removal under INA §241(a)(5), rejecting Petitioner’s argument that her re-entry into the United States using another person’s passport did not constitute an illegal entry for reinstatement purposes. (Beekhan v. Holder, 2/25/11)
USCIS Q&A for 2/24/11 Quarterly National Stakeholder Meeting
USCIS Q&A for its 2/24/11 quarterly national stakeholder meeting with agency program officers and directorates. Topics include fee waivers, the visa bulletin, asylee derivatives, RFE templates, H-1B cap exemptions, and more. Original invitation and agenda follow Q&A.
CA3 Says Withdrawal of Application for Admission Interrupted Physical Presence
Upon return from a trip to Canada, Petitioner knowingly withdrew his application for admission in lieu of a formal admissibility determination, such that his continuous presence was terminated for cancellation purposes. (Demandstein v. Att’y Gen. of the U.S., 2/24/11)
BIA Remands for Analysis of Third Silva-Trevino Step
The BIA held that absent otherwise controlling authority, IJs and the BIA are bound to apply all three steps of the Silva-Trevino methodology for determining whether an offense constitutes a CIMT. Matter of Guevara Alfaro, 25 I&N Dec. 417 (BIA 2011)
USCIS Memo on New TRIG Exemption for Solicitation
USCIS 2/23/11 policy memo guiding the implementation of a new discretionary exemption that authorizes USCIS not to apply the solicitation inadmissibility grounds to certain individuals who, under duress, solicited funds or members for a terrorist organization.
USCIS Memo on New TRIG Exemption for Military-Type Training
USCIS 2/23/11 policy memo guiding the implementation of a new discretionary exemption that authorizes USCIS not to apply the military-type training inadmissibility grounds to certain individuals who, under duress, received military-type training from a terrorist organization.
CA9 Remands, Discusses Adverse Credibility and Deliberate Fabrication
The court upheld the IJ’s adverse credibility determination as supported by substantial evidence, but found that the heightened requirements for determining that Petitioner’s application for asylum was frivolous were not met. (Liu v. Holder, 2/23/11)
AILA Comments on Coordination of USCIS and ICE on Cases in Proceedings
AILA’s comments in response to the USCIS interim memorandum on coordinating the adjudication of applications and petitions involving individuals in removal proceedings. Special thanks to Mary Kramer.
Lopez-Mendoza, Motions to Suppress, and Tolentino
AILA Amicus Committee alert on INS v. Lopez-Mendoza and its impact on Tolentino v. NY, a case that explores whether pre-existing identity-related governmental documents, obtained through police action violative of the Fourth Amendment, are subject to the exclusionary rule.
CA9 Upholds Removal of Palestinian Citizen with Alleged Ties to Hamas
The court held that the BIA’s determination that Petitioner was inadmissible in that he was likely to engage in terrorist activity or provide material support to a terrorist organization was supported by substantial evidence. (Abufayad v. Holder, 2/16/11)
CA4 Reverses BIA, Remands MS-13 Asylum Claim
The court found that the BIA’s determination that “family members of those who actively oppose gangs in El Salvador by agreeing to be prosecutorial witnesses” was not a particular social group, was manifestly contrary to law. (Crespin-Valladares v. Holder, 2/16/11)
CA1 Says Expedited Removal Breaks Physical Presence for Cancellation
The court denied the petition for review, finding the BIA’s determination that an expedited removal order halts continuous physical presence for purposes of cancellation of removal was reasonable. (Vasquez v. Holder, 2/16/11)
CA6 Remands, Finding Past Persecution in Sierra Leone Withholding Claim
The court held that the record established that Petitioner was targeted for his political opinion when his house was burned down, and the totality of the circumstances, including his son’s murder, satisfies a finding of past persecution. (Vincent v. Holder, 2/15/11)
DHS Secretary Napolitano Announces FY2012 Budget Request
DHS press release on Secretary Napolitano’s unveiling of the FY2012 budget request. The press release breaks down FY2012 budget priorities, such as securing and managing U.S. borders, as well as enforcing and administering immigration laws, and links to a fact sheet.
CA7 Upholds Use of Collateral Estoppel in Removal Case of Former Nazi
The court denied the petition for review, finding that Petitioner was afforded a full and fair opportunity to litigate his claims in denaturalization proceedings, and upheld the IJ’s application of the collateral estoppel doctrine. (Firishchak v. Holder, 2/14/11)