Featured Issues

Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0

The U.S. immigration court system plays a critical role in upholding due process and ensuring fair hearings for individuals facing deportation. However, since January 20, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has implemented significant changes that challenge the structural integrity of these courts. This page aims to provide up-to-date information on the policy and legal shifts affecting the U.S. immigration court system.

Latest Updates

Take action now.

Urge Congress to hold the executive branch accountable for systemic attack on immigration courts.
TAKE ACTION

Updates from EOIR

Browse the Featured Issue: U.S. Immigration Courts under Trump 2.0 collection
11,326 - 11,350 of 12,971 collection items
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA5 Finds No Jurisdiction to Review Visa Revocation Under INA §205

The court held that the decision of the Secretary of Homeland Security to revoke a visa under INA §205 is purely discretionary and may not be reviewed by the court of appeals in accordance with INA §242(a)(2)(B)(ii). (Ghanem v. Upchurch, 3/6/07)

3/6/07 AILA Doc. No. 07032662. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA10 Refuses to Suppress Evidence of Unlawful Immigration Status

The court held that a federal agent’s failure to provide a lawfully detained suspect a Miranda warning prior to inquiring about his immigration status does not require suppression of that status where fingerprint evidence subsequently confirms such status. (U.S. v. Lara-Garcia, 3/6/07)

3/6/07 AILA Doc. No. 07032665. Removal & Relief

DHS OIG Assessment of ICE’s Fugitive Operations Teams

This March 2007 report addresses the effectiveness of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Fugitive Operations Teams.

3/5/07 AILA Doc. No. 07070665. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Finds Ukrainian Whistleblower Was Persecuted for his Political Opinion

The court held that the BIA erred in finding that Petitioner’s whistleblowing was not political opinion. The court found his whistleblowing was political because it was directed “toward a government institution.” (Fedunyak v. Gonzales, 3/2/07)

3/2/07 AILA Doc. No. 07041064. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA9 Holds California Stalking Conviction is Not a “Crime of Violence”

On petition for rehearing, the court held that Petitioner’s conviction for stalking under California Penal Code §646.9 does not qualify as a crime of violence under 18 USC §16(b), and is therefore, not an aggravated felony. (Malta-Espinoza v. Gonzales, 3/2/07)

3/2/07 AILA Doc. No. 07032664. Crimes, Removal & Relief

BIA Holds TPS Can Be Asserted in Removal Proceedings

The BIA held that Temporary Protected Status can be asserted in removal proceedings, even if AAU previously denied application. Matter of Barrientos, 24 I&N Dec. 100 (BIA 2007)

Immigration Law Today-Mar/Apr 2007

The Mar/Apr 2007 issue of Immigration Law Today focuses on asylum, including one man's journey behind Guantanamo, asylees from gang warfare, and children fleeing persecution.

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Finds BIA’s Summary Dismissal Proper Where No Brief Was Filed

The court found that there was no error or abuse of discretion in BIA’s summary dismissal in the case of an applicant who indicated on her NOA that a brief would be filed and then failed to file a brief.(Kokar v. Gonzales, 3/1/07)

3/1/07 AILA Doc. No. 07042768. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Finds Iraqi Filed Frivolous Asylum Claim; Denies Asylum, W/H, and VAWA

The court found that the IJ’s determination that Petitioner filed a frivolous asylum application was supported by substantial evidence. The court also found that substantial evidence supported the IJ’s negative credibility finding. (Aziz v. Gonzales, 3/1/07)

3/1/07 AILA Doc. No. 07041063. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Upholds Finding that Indonesian Christians Lack Well-Founded Fear

The court held that the past incidents suffered by Petitioners did not amount to persecution because they were limited to minor damage to their car and home, a robbery, and fleeing from a church unharmed. (Lengkong v. Gonzales, 3/1/07)

3/1/07 AILA Doc. No. 07041062. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

Immigration Law Advisor, February 2007 (Vol. 1, No. 2)

Immigration Law Advisor with an article on misdemeanor assault, battery, and harassment as crimes of violence, an article on the high dismissal rate of petitions for review, federal court activity and recent BIA decisions for January 2007, and a regulatory update.

3/1/07 AILA Doc. No. 07030199. Crimes, Removal & Relief

DHS Testimony on Immigration Reform before the Senate Judiciary Committee

On 2/28/07, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding comprehensive immigration reform.

Federal Agencies, FR Regulations & Notices

Published Notice on FOIA Processing Track for Those Appearing Before an IJ

Effective 3/30/07, a third FOIA request processing track will be established for individuals appearing before an immigration judge. (72 FR 9017, 2/28/07)

2/28/07 AILA Doc. No. 07022860. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

USCIS Press Release on New NTA FOIA Request Track

A 2/28/07 USCIS Press Release announced the launch of a new FOIA request track for individuals who are scheduled to appear before an IJ. Cases in which an IJ has issued a final order or those in which an appeal has been filed with the BIA will not be included in the new NTA FOIA request track.

2/28/07 AILA Doc. No. 07030111. Removal & Relief
Federal Agencies, Agency Memos & Announcements

USCIS Issues FOIA Fact Sheet

A 2/28/07 USCIS FOIA Fact Sheet, describes the three FOIA request processing tracks. Guidelines are provided on the information and documentation required to place a request in the new Notice to Appear track, effective 3/30/07.

2/28/07 AILA Doc. No. 07030165. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA7 Refuses to Allow Late Filed Motion to Reopen for §212(c) Relief

Petitioner’s special motion to reopen for consideration of his application for §212(c) relief was filed after the 4/26/05 deadline imposed by 8 CFR §1003.44(h), and thus the petition for review was denied.(Johnson v. Gonzales, 2/28/07)

2/28/07 AILA Doc. No. 07032017. Cancellation, Suspension & 212(c), Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA2 Finds Sexual Assault Was Motivated by Protected Ground

The court found that the beatings and sexual assault were motivated in part by an imputed political opinion and Petitioner’s Tamil ethnicity and that the assault cannot be viewed as simply a criminal act. (Rizvie v. Gonzales, 2/28/07)

2/28/07 AILA Doc. No. 07041060. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA6 Finds No Abuse of Discretion in BIA Denial of Motions to Reopen and Reconsider

CA6 held that absent evidence of an I-130, Petitioner failed to establish prima facie eligibility for adjustment of status. Because new evidence was introduced, the motion will be treated as a second motion to reopen which is barred by statute and regulation. (Alizoti v. Gonzales, 2/26/07)

Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA3 Remands for Analysis of “Particularly Serious Crime” Bar to CAT Relief

The court remanded to the BIA, finding that the IJ failed to discuss why Petitioner’s conviction did not meet the requirements for an exception to the particularly serious crime presumption. (Lavira v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 2/26/07)

2/26/07 AILA Doc. No. 07031964. Asylum, Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA11 Reverses IJ’s Finding that Petitioner Was Convicted of an Aggravated Felony

CA11 held that the IJ erred in concluding that the restitution order was evidence of the loss needed to transform a fraud conviction into an aggravated felony. The restitution order was based on facts that were not charged, proven or admitted. (Obasohan v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 2/23/07)

2/23/07 AILA Doc. No. 07032018. Crimes, Removal & Relief

CA6 Dismisses Appeal Under Fugitive Disentitlement Doctrine

After filing the petition for review, Petitioner failed to report for removal despite a lawful order requiring him to do so. The court dismissed Petitioner’s appeal of the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen under the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. (Garcia-Flores v. Gonzales, 2/23/07)

2/23/07 AILA Doc. No. 07031966. Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Finds Lack of Jurisdiction to Review Timeliness of Asylum Application

The court found that it was precludedfrom reviewing the timeliness of an asylum applicatio, and noted that it was granted limited jurisdiction under REAL ID Act to review constitutional claims or errors of law, but that the date of entry was a factual finding. (Yakovenko v. Gonzales, 2/23/07)

2/23/07 AILA Doc. No. 07040366. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA8 Remands Mexican CAT Claim to BIA

CA8 noted that the BIA is required to defer to the factual findings of the IJ unless they are clearly erroneous and the Board did not find clear error in the IJ’s finding that Petitioner was likely to be tortured by Mexican officials. Case remanded to BIA. (Ramirez-Peyro v. Gonzales, 2/23/07)

2/23/07 AILA Doc. No. 07040362. Asylum, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, DOJ/EOIR Cases

BIA Finds Money Laundering in Violation of NY Penal Law is CIMT

The BIA dismissed appeal and reaffirmed decision holding that the offense of money laundering in violation of section 470.10(1) of the New York Penal Law is a crime involving moral turpitude. Matter of Tejwani, 24 I&N Dec. 97 (BIA 2007)

2/22/07 AILA Doc. No. 07022365. Crimes, Removal & Relief
Cases & Decisions, Federal Court Cases

CA4 Finds IJ’s Jurisdiction Over AOS Applications Encompasses INA §204(j)

CA4 held that statutory jurisdiction over adjustment of status is unambiguously vested in the IJ and encompasses jurisdiction to determine whether an approved visa petition remains valid under INA §204(j) when the beneficiary changes employment. (Perez-Vargas v. Gonzales, 2/22/07)

2/22/07 AILA Doc. No. 07030870. Adjustment of Status, Business Immigration, Removal & Relief